José Ramos Photography
“The Spirits Return”
Sony a7R + Zeiss 16-35mm f4
ISO: 1600
Exposure: 30 seconds
Focus: Manual
Wireless Shutter Release
Manfrotto 055XPRO3 tripod
1) Submit your picture with a message and picture here: facebook.com/sonyalpharumors or on the SonyAlphaForum image section.
2) Like and comment the pictures from other readers here: facebook.com/sonyalpharumors/photos_stream?tab=photos and on SonyAlphaForum.
3) A selection of most liked pictures by the community and by me SAR admin will be posted weekly on SAR.
Note: When sending a pic feel free to also add a link to your site to promote yourself!
Tomapaul on SonyAlphaForum
lawyer portraits – A7II sony/zeiss 55mm & sigma 35mm
Stan Moniz
The beautiful North Shore of Oahu, Hawaii. Shot with AquaTech compac housing / Sony a7rii / Tokina 11-16mm f2.8
Jonathan Ferland-Valois
Cab of Nightmares. Cabs kept passing for hours, making it a nightmare to bracket my shots without anything moving and without getting light trails. Was a nightmare. Happy Halloween! grin emoticon
A6000 + Tamron 15-30 f/2.8 with Kipon Tilt-Shift adapter. Works really well.
Ata Mohammad Adnan
Sony A7ii + canon 17-35/2.8
Walter Greber
Sony A7 and 35mm Zeiss 2.8, Shot at F/7.1, 1/50sec, ISO 125. Okinawa Japan.
Jeriel Reyes De Silos
Camera: Sony NEX-5T
Lens: SELP1650 kit lens
Singapore
Frankie Withers
Muir Woods
Sony A99, Carl Zeiss 24-70 F/2.8 Sonnar T I
Pierre Paqueton
Clouds over Paris, shot with a good old Nex 6 and a Zeiss 24f1.8. If you want to see more pics, visit my blog ! And don’t hesitate to leave a comment smile emoticon https://lecomptoirdepierre.wordpress.com/…/mirabeau-tryptic/
Peter Georges
Majestic Night – Shot with the Sony A7rII + Sony 28mm f2 by Peter Georges Photography
Sheng Peng
Christ Church College at the University of Oxford, or, as what most people have known from the Harry Potter films, the Great Hall of Hogwarts.
Sony A7
ISO400
Zeiss 55MMF1.5 at F2.0
F2.0
1.60 Second
38 Responses
Great work.
*yawn*… boring.
Care to share your works of magnificence?
Yes I can. I do have that ability. However, I am not going to. Be that as that is, I am also not going to share any that are not magnificent. Listen, I have an opinion as you and others do. You see some photographic value in this lot of pics… then, good for you. I and others, however, do not. That is just the way the real world works.
If you’ve got nothing nice to say, why bother? Especially if you’re not willing to hold your own work up to scrutiny. You don’t even have a specific critique.
Pathetic.
When one does not have substance enough to argue a point, one usually resorts to a or several straw-man tactics. Eff your “nice” shit. Nobody grows to be better within a world that is not nice by others being nice about every effin thing.
I did have a “specific critique” you effin idiot, and I expressed that general critique by commenting “*yawn*… boring”. What part of that is so hard for you to understand/comprehend?
This is a capitalistic society. The ultimate scrutiny is sales of product, not comments in SAR.
You are not pathetic as you claim you are. You are more so an idiot and a mangina (which is worse than being just pathetic).
Do you talk as rudely and arrogantly like this to people in real life? Just curious.
The implied of your comment is that you are being arrogantly rude to me. You are projecting obviously. So feminine of you. Should I thank you for being so deceptively rude to me… and very disingenuous? You were not curious, you were just being a stupid and foolish person. I have my opinion on the lot of pics, and you and others have your opinions. Why would your opinion be more valid in SAR than mine or several others? You make your claims, and I make mine. That is the way the real world works.
In the end, we all dies, and all this that you and others are finding so important of yourselves will die long before your bodies rot away.
Uh, so that’s a yes? Okie doke.
No. That is not a “yes”. This should be a great indicator to you of how stupid you are… as in, really stupid.
Actually, I think a person needing 145 words to clarify that they are saying “no” to a simple yes/no question is stupid (really stupid). Anyway, I’m glad to know you’re not like this to people in real life.
I’m like this in what you claim to be “real life”, for I am confident in who and what I am, and am not ashamed of being so. My question to you is… were you born stupid, or do you practice at being so. Either which it is, you are really good at being stupid.
Ha! Wow…okay, then your answer to my original question was actually “yes”. Maybe you got confused arguing with everybody else in this thread that you didn’t know up from down anymore by the time you got to my question. Understandable. I honestly really was just curious, because you’re such a caricature of a classic Internet tough guy/gal that it’s hard to believe someone actually talks to people the way you do when they have to do it face to face.
Nah…I still don’t think you’re like this in real life. Too ridiculous a persona to think there’s any authenticity behind it. But I do commend the effort!
So sad that you are so comfortable in being so wrong. Go now, and like so many others, wallow in your splendiferousness, for that is all that you have to make you feel to be something other than the lessor lot that you know that you are.
Well, that’s a shame…things were almost pitch-perfect till you took it way over the top. I can practically picture you with your nose in the air, sipping tea with your pinky out while saying this, and that’s just too farcical to be taken with any seriousness (not that I really was before, but I was giving it the benefit of the doubt…).
thanks for the feature, was hoping for this one tho
I like the ideas with the raindrops but the one exactly on her face is distracting. Otherwise, a nice photograph.
Weird. No A100 pics this week.
Great work guys!
you are spam ? 97$ an hour online is chathost work, isn’t it? 😀
Nice ones… Thanks for sharing.
Beautiful pictures ( my favorite are Walter Greber and Peter Georges) , but i’m out to kick some post boxes just to have the pleasure to meet the pretty lawyer 😀 !!!
Cheers 🙂
Thanks for your comments. Concealing the eyes always adds mystery and forces your eye around other parts of the photograph (this is not a portrait). I loved the looks this model could give me- Half-Japanese and half-Russian is a killer combo.This is part of an editorial for Triangl swimsuits published last June in Turks & Caicos Magazine
What’s the models name?
And I agree with both sentiments in regards to the covering of the eye.
You just get dumped bro?
Not a bro, am I. Additionally, your assessment is invalid for you being invalid.
Gotta get laid
There’s a story behind every picture- that’s half the fun. You chat with people on here all week and get to see what inspires them. You most certainly are entitled to your criticism but why not add to the conversation rather than detract. Plus, the fact you mentioned straw-man tactics gives me the impression you like to debate a lot. Who uses that term in a thread on photography?
I do because I have chosen not to stop my education at the elementary school level.
Be that as it is, I repeat what I have posted previously… It was not an effin critique. It was a comment. Get over it you manginas.
You don’t want to be hurt, this is the wrong world for you. Eveyone getts negative reviews, sometimes face-to-face, most of the time behind their backs. I do not value your opinions, or those of many others, less you prove to me that you are worthy. So far, you and many others have only proven that you are less than intellectual in many ways… but, you are great manginas.
I give you some respect for using the word mangina in a full sentence. That is all.
Now before you go off spouting something about being intellectual. May I draw your attention to the fact that your name is witcheater and you used the word..not once…but twice…you implored the word mangina in a sentence…which I give you kudos for. Just a side note though. I have yet to read any peer review research from any intellectual in which the word mangina shows up even once.
I have no other choice but to then assume that your works of photographic genius are pictures of manginas.
Look at you just going right ahead and assassinating your own character like that.
1) Whether or not a word is ever used in any peer reviewed paper does not discount the fact that it is a valid word for it being used in valid ways by others. Just because one circle is inept in the common language does not make the used of a word invalid.
2) You failed immensely in pointing out the connection that you implied to be important to your failed argument with my disqus handle of “witcheater”. Maybe the sentence you fabricated just got to long and you forgot what it was that maybe you were trying to say?
3) You have no other choice than to fail even at trying to insult me? It is obvious that you did not even take the time to google the word and usage of the word mangina… but if you did, how you were only able to attempt to insult me is such a lame way says so very little for your… ummm… intellect(?).
4) And in the end, it still comes down to that I made a comment in SAR that I found this weeks photo selections boring. How you and others were able to take that to where you have taken it just says so little good about the lot of you.
Be that as it is…..you’re a moron.
I am also correct… and you and your lot are not.
A critique can’t be as simple as “it’s boring”. What do you find boring, and why? You don’t have to tell us what to do to make it less boring, that’s entirely up to us if we agree with you or not. But giving more precision would turn your comment from something a troll would say to a constructive criticism.
And the ultimate scrutiny is sales… For a professional. For someone who just sees it as a hobby and don’t want to make a living from it, it’s not about sales but personal satisfaction. Doesn’t mean that person doesn’t want to be good and improve, but the incentive would be to make the image better, not to sell more.
It was not an effin critique. It was a comment. Get over it you manginas.
If it wasn’t a critique and was just a comment, what was the point of posting it? Usually, if I post a negative comment, I don’t just post a negative comment, I tell people what I think they’re doing wrong so that I don’t post something disagreeable just for the sake of it.