Advertisement
SNAPCLOUDBack up every photoUnlimited RAW storage, 30 days freeTry freeSample ad
Advertisement
Advertisement

This week SAR readers photos selection.


Павел Петров
Afterdrive
Sony A77 + Sigma 17-70/2.8-4
24mm, f/5.0, 1/2500

1) Submit your picture with a message and picture here: facebook.com/sonyalpharumors.
2) Like and comment the pictures from other readers here: facebook.com/sonyalpharumors/photos.
3) A selection of most liked pictures by the community and by me SAR admin will be posted weekly on SAR.


Amrit Kandola‎
A7s Zeiss 35mm f2.8


Jacob Daniel Glauninger‎
A7+ Mitakon 50mm f0.95


Alexandre Suplicy‎
I made this picture in Namibia desert this year.
This shot won the “Travel Photography Awards” under the “Rookie Awards” category.
http://www.travelphotographyawards.com/winners/2014


Theodore Kefalopoulos‎
Lux e tenebris…
Sony A7 & Zeiss FE 2470z F4 — in Vrondoú, Pieria, Greece.


Carlos San Miguel‎
Bund, Shanghai. Sony a7-r + Canon 24mm f/1.4


Gregory Hairston‎
Sony A99, CZ 85 1.4
With Faizah Husniyah


Stefan Grosjean‎
I just came back from my first shooting trip to Venice with my new A7S. What can I say, the 12MP-sensor really is great for night time photography. Usually I don’t feel comfortable using ISO 1’600 on full frame but this is ISO 16’000 (that’s three zeros). The camera was handheld with OSS activated. Of course there’s heavy noise but compare ISO 16’000 with any other sensor!
Sony A7S @ 1/40s, ISO 16’000, FE 24-70mm f4 @ f4 / 52mm, OSS

 


Morten Aagaard Krogh‎
I had the change to shoot the new Sony a7S at music festival this weekend. Take a look at the photos here http://heretoday.dk/photos-trailerpark-festival/


Maxime Siegler
In the Corner
Sony a99 + Samyang/Rokinon 35mm f/1.4
https://www.facebook.com/maxime.siegler.photography


Josh McLeod‎
Sony A7s & Zeiss Sonnar T* 1,8/55
www.joshmcleodphotography.com


Ehduard Sinyakov‎
Вестники рассвета


Ren Murray
A99 with Tamron 24-70 f2.8 USD

Share this story
Community

Join the discussion

0 Responses

    1. Kudos for the heavy work at pp.

      But this is the only picture telling more or less nothing.
      Nice Girls – Yes
      Nice Car – Yes
      Comfortable looking armchair – Yes
      Bottle of Jack Daniels – Yes

      But what’s about that all combined?
      Honestly, I am not getting it.

      1. Yeah, I agree. I think it’s meant to be shocking- but it isn’t. If I want to see two hot chicks on my grandma’s sofa drinking JD….well, I’m out of luck. Thing is, I don’t want to. I give the guy respect for the photo shopping but that’s about it.

  1. That image is just cliched sexist crap, maybe you could balance it out with a photo of two hot guys in front of a shopping trolly with their hands in each others jocks and looking tantilisingly into each others eyes, throw in a sunset then you can offend everyone. Is this site just a hangout for lonely guys with no imagination?

      1. Not liking pictures with unnecessary eroticism and slutty clothes makes someone queen of the prudes? I must be the king of the prudes then. Still better than being a 12 year old pervert kid who enjoys looking at pictures like that imo.

        1. I’m thinking there’s room for two queens of the prudes. So you’re a queen too if that’s what you want to be.

        2. You’re absolute right. In Soviet Amerika, photos should be limited to landscapes and wholesome images of doggies and kitties. All else will result in you having to explain it to your local kommisar.

      2. I agree, stop being such a prude. The photographer expressed his creative vision and if its too much for your delicate sensitivities then maybe you should stay in the kiddy pool

    1. Use your imagination, time, skills, money & effort to create it and then post it on the SAR FB page. If it gets enough hits we’ll get to see it posted here for anonymous trolls, without any of their own work on display, to sanctimoniously criticize.

    1. Seems to be a composite image. Light and shadow balances are bugging me even though the concept and picture as a whole is no less than okay. That some of the items seem to be out of focus when they for this type of photo should not be cannot be written off. The composition/concept is good enough where I’d like to see this redone.

  2. First image is poor. The radial filter is far too obvious. If done properly, it shouldn’t be noticeable at all. Hate the cheesy sepia colour cast. The photographer should have been able to do something more classy with 2 beautiful models to play with.

  3. Since we’re all hitting on the first image..I think the girl on the right doesn’t look to into it. She’s kinda like, hey I was going to park my asss here and drink this bottle of jack. Oh wait, you wanna sit here too? Oh alright, I’ll look like I’m into this but you can totally tell I just want to get my drink on.

  4. Tenebrism and Nambia are my favorites. The venice one is nice too. If only the ball was in focus and the girl slightly out of focus for the last one though… That would have been amazing.

  5. many ppl talked about the volleyball pic is out of focus. So, what if the photograher re-shoot it with A77m2 ‘s focus-tracking? Do you think one would get a better picture?

    1. No, I would try to set it up with manual focus, and try to align the objects to the focus (drop the ball so it is perfectly sharp)

  6. The ‘Lux e tenebris…’ photo has potential – but it needs to have the DFT Rays plug-in light source further from the window to make the rays more parallel. Plus, its important to watch the shadows and select a base photo that doesn’t have a cloudy sky as the background.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search

Search
Advertisement
SNAPCLOUDBack up everyphotoTry freeSample ad

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

*Please also check your spam folder if you don't get the confirmation mail. And mark the mail as "non-spam" to see the future newsletter.

Advertisement
SNAPCLOUDBack up everyphotoTry freeSample ad
Advertisement
Advertisement