Advertisement
SNAPCLOUDBack up every photoUnlimited RAW storage, 30 days freeTry freeSample ad
Advertisement
Advertisement

Sony Tidbits…


Sony 30mm F2.8 Macro Lens Review

Zeiss Batis on preorder at Amazon DE (Click here)
350 pounds off on the A7Ii at Amazon UK (Click here)
The German Stiftung Warentest says the new Sony A7II scored the best IQ ranking ever (Test.de).
Chipworks reverse engineers Sony 2nd generation stacked sensor (Image Sensor World).
Zeiss Loxia 50mm tested at Focus Numerique.
Online has very differing views on the A7ii 5 axis (SonyAlphaForum).
Zeiss Loxia 35mm F2 Lens Review by SonyAlphaLab on Youtube.
Hands-On Review of the Atomos Shogun (BHphoto).
Why you shouldn’t trust DXO lens testing (SonyAlphaForum).
Einfach nur genial: Das Sonnar T* FE 2,8/35 ZA (Joerghaag.com).

Share this story
Community

Join the discussion

10 Responses

      1. I own camera mainly for stills, and video is a bonus.
        Reading is faster than hearing, and no Flash involved.

  1. Must be a slow week. That was my 1st experimental cheapy macro lens and it was terrible to do manual focus as too much play for a precise focus. 1:1 minimum focus distance is like….against the lens. No, I wouldn’t recommend it to anyone. 🙂 Look at John having a smirk smile while trying to manual focusing it. LOL

    1. For handheld macro focusing it’s better to set the lens at a particular focus distance then move the camera to fine tune it. Even with higher quality macro lenses precise focus can be difficult at high magnification, and even on a tripod it can be better to use a macro rail to move the camera rather than move the focus ring.

      I’d agree that this lens isn’t the best choice for photographing insects, and the close distance means that the camera’s shadow can get in the way if you’re not shooting with full flash, but that doesn’t mean that it isn’t a useful lens. A wider lens can work really well for something like a small
      flower, water droplets, or other things that don’t get spooked if you
      get too close.

      I wouldn’t recommend it as someone’s only macro lens, but along with something like a Tamron 90mm it gives you a lot of close up versatility. It’s pretty much the only option for APS-C users who want the same kind of effect that 50mm macro lenses offer on full frame.

  2. the guy from the “don´t trust DXO” thread is an idi*t par excellance….
    no clue but insulting everyone who has….

  3. You should not imply DxO lens ratings can’t be trusted. The guy on the forum is not talking about the same thing as the DxO calculation.

    It’s times like these you really let down your readers with incorrect titles for click-baited links.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search

Search
Advertisement
SNAPCLOUDBack up everyphotoTry freeSample ad

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

*Please also check your spam folder if you don't get the confirmation mail. And mark the mail as "non-spam" to see the future newsletter.

Advertisement
SNAPCLOUDBack up everyphotoTry freeSample ad
Advertisement
Advertisement