Add sexiness to your A6000 with the newly released Gariz leather case!

0 Responses

1. There’s something inherently wrong about wrapping a hunk of cheap plastic with beautiful leather.

   Reply

   1. Hank were you born a douche bag or is it a habit you
      developed over time?

      Reply

      1. No u.

         Reply

      2. Pretty sure you’re looking in the mirror. Putting a leather case on the A6000 is like putting a bag over a cheap hooker’s head.

         Reply

         1. at least he has experience with cheap hookers…

            Reply

            1. LOL !

            2. Its so funny to see ‘fan boys’ bitching in comments 😀

2. “Add tackiness to your A6000 with the newly released Gariz leather case!”

   There, I fixed it for you.

   Reply

   1. Does it come in chartreuse? ;^)

      Reply

3. Because we e-mount fans hate big and bulky the first thing we do is wrap our new cameras in a case. ;^)

   Reply

   1. aside from bulkiness, it will add better base for the tripod mount.

      Reply

      1. So, how many people have complained about the “cheap” tripod mount?

         I use mine extensively with lenses heavier than 500g. And with really heavy lenses, anyone sane would use a tripod collar. Maybe what you need is not a leather case but a better mounting plate.

         Reply

4. no wonder it is sexy, the thing is full of holes and made like a woman’s string, you pay much for nothing.

   Reply

   1. True, on the other hand it’s so far the most practical case in terms of giving you access to all the buttons. I have one on my A7 and it way way better than the bundled Sony’s one.

      Reply

      1. What about not using any ?

         Reply

5. Nothing says sexy like a piece of dead tortured animal

   Reply

6. Can someone please tell me if the a6000 has movie steadyshot? I’m talking about the electronic stabilization and not the optical. And if it has electronic steadyshot can it be combined with optical steadyshot too? Can someone tell me how both stabilizers work?

   Reply

   1. The first sel18200 has it in lens.

      Reply

      1. I just watched a review for sel18200 and it has a barrel distortion at the long end of the zoom. It is very bad for video. I might stick with the 16-50 with OSS. thanks!

         Reply

         1. Some others will advice you not to buy 16-50 OSS either…it seems to me there’s only World Press photographers here or sond with Onassis bank accounts to buy Zeiss lenses. Btw to quote Steve huff, w should better look for artistic picture than technical one. Nature is made of curves(my favourites are womem’ ones) while the straight lines are Human creation

            Reply

            1. the curve barrel distortion of sel18-200 is unacceptable. the curve goes in and not out so it doesnt look artistic to me. Do you have any good E mount lens recommendation that is good for video? I need something bright and wide. The carl zeiss f/4 sucks

            2. depends on what you’re shooting and where you’re shooting. what kind of shots (hand-held? pans? tracking? tripod?)
               i assume you’re just shooting like you would with your phone or taking short home videos. i suggest you just get an entirely different camera and lens system since you’re unhappy with everything sony makes (all three 18-200s and the 18-105). I recommend a BMCC with an EF mount and an EF 70-200L IS 2.8 lens. of you can get the EOS C300. that’s a nice camera too.

            3. I agree with gunboat… If you wanna record video, you’d better use a camcorder.

   2. No, the a6000 doesn’t have electronic stabilization, only the Alpha SLTs (A77, A65, A57, A37, A58, A99) have that. For E-mount, stabilisation is lens based only.

      Reply

      1. thanks for a clear answer! looks like i need to buy a lens with OSS

         Reply

7. omg, don’t put the camera like this, it’s a sensor dust trap 🙂

   Reply