X-T1 pre-orders
X-T1 body only ($1,299): USA: AmazonUS / BHphoto / Adorama / Pictureline / EU: wexDE / wexUK / PCHstore /
X-T1 with 18-55 ($1,699): USA: AmazonUS / BHphoto / Adorama / Pictureline / EU: wexDE / wexUK / PCHstore /
X-T1 Vertical Battery Grip ($ 249,99): USA: AmazonUS / BHphoto / Adorama / EU: wexDE / wexUK /
X-T1 Hand Grip ($129.95): USA: AmazonUS / Bhphoto / EU: wexUk / wexDE
_ _ _
[UDPATE: photographyblog marked the X-T1 as “essential” (5 out of 5 stars) review here: “The Fujifilm X-T1 produces images of outstanding quality […] The new Fujifilm X-T1 is the best X-series camera to date, and one of the best interchangeable lens cameras, mirrorless or otherwise, that we’ve ever had the pleasure of reviewing. […] The fantastic electronic viewfinder is more than good enough to impress those who swear by an optical viewfinder, while the weather-proof body, tilting LCD screen, USH-II card compatability, fast autofocusing and speedy all-round performance, and the much improved wi-fi connectivity options are the icing on a superbly balanced cake.”]
We’ve read a lot yesterday (read here) about one of the most amazing features of the [shoplink 21553]X-T1[/shoplink]: its EVF! Praised even by EVF haters for his crips and lag free image, loved by enthusiasts for its “3D pop” and colors as if “I was looking at my fullscreen Apple Macbook Retina display.”
Even the focus is said to be unusually fast and snappy… and the new “predictive AF” seems really to work fine, just check out Rico’s first look here.
There was also someone saying that the X-T1’s design and function “simply puts the [shoplink 21555]Nikon DF[/shoplink] to shame.” One more confirmation comes from guswaschefort here. He tested it with the [shoplink 21554]56mm[/shoplink] in very low light at a concert:
“The traditional manual-style controls of Fujifilm X-Series cameras have gained much popularity. The X-T 1 takes this aspect even further, with a manual knob control for ISO, and manual controls to select frame rate and metering coverage […] The X-T 1 is undoubtedly the most intuitive digital camera I have ever handled.”
And what about shooting videos with the X-T1? Well, if you look at this youtube video here, videos seem to suffer of moiree. So while the X-Trans pixel array does a great job to prevent (not to eliminate) moiree in stills, the same advantage doesn’t seem to apply to videos!
There are some more samples at dpr and don’t miss to check out also Rico’s X-T1 + 10-24 images (RAW’s converted with Iridient) at Flickr here.
X-T1 body only ($1,299): USA: AmazonUS / BHphoto / Adorama / Pictureline / EU: wexDE / wexUK / PCHstore /
cheers
Patrick
P.S.: I’m glad to see that apparently the Italian photography site riflessifotografici is working on an interesting comparison 😉
image courtesy: riflessifotografici
51 Responses
The camera has been available for pre-order at Amazon.de since yesterday. Members of other European countries can also order from Amazon.de, with the guaranteed lowered price in case of a price drop before actual shipment, and the 30 day return policy. Patrick, if you’re affiliated with them, make sure to include the link as I’m sure some Euro FR readers might be interested.
I’m not not affiliated with AmazonEU.
Check fotomundus24.de and search for the X-T1. They offer a 100,- € discount on it, also on several kits (as well as 50€ discounts on some lenses).
It works fine, I’ve tried it with the X-E2, you just gotta contact them via e-mail after your order and ask for the reduction as it doesn’t appear in the first order confirmation you get. They send you a corrected version, then you can transfer the money (advance payment). Take some of the money you’ve saved and donate it to FR and everyone’s happy!
I’m glad to see this camera keeping the interest levels high on sites like DPReview. I just hope this all translates into big sales for Fuji. I want them to keep going with this system. I may not like the x-trans sensor especially much, but, overall, I think it’s the best camera system for the money and weight. And I really, really want to see that rumored 120-400mm super telephoto zoom come to fruition (or whatever it really ends up being, as long as it hits that 600mm equivalent, I’ll be really happy).
Thanks for all your hard work patrick! I am a Nikon user of 10 years, and was set on the Nikon DF until that ridiculous price tag was announced. My Nikon gear will be for sale shortly and I will be purchasing a Fuji X-T1! (sorry can’t use one of your links on your sites as I don’t think you have a deal with anyone in New Zealand)
I’d think twice to do that – because I went a bit through the same logic and the only thing is that I started reverting my decission. I even expanded my Nikon gear towards a new D800 and new lenses after using the X-Pro1 for 1.5 years. The X-T1 is likely offering better ergonomics but the X-trans sensor remains what it is, a 16MP crop sensor and my Nikon FF stuff still beats with the higher resolution and dynamics any X-trans hands down. I’m not too wild about the RAW-conversions either – also in this respect, NEF’s have NO artifacts, NO color bleeding, NO pixelation errors and you can fully control the compression and thus IQ in the pro-Nikons. Last but not least, as long as Fujifilm has no credible flash accessories whatsoever, the system falls off for a lot of people, whatever fancy camera they may develop. Don’t let you fool by the hype, I find working with the X-Pro1 and most of all its unpredictable AF system a bit like learning to play violin to get descent results.
With the 16mp X-Trans sensor you can print A0 photos @300dpi@ISO 100/200. Do you print larger than A0? Although I’m not a fan of Ken Rokwell, regarding the megapixel war this guy is right: 6mp are more than enough for most work. So more than 12mp is just marketing and pr for pixel peepers. Remember, if you print larger than A0 it’s meant to view the print from at least 10ft so pixel peeping is no good.
Regarding the flash system you are right. But for real pro work there are strobes and studio equipment (even portable for outdoor use) that are miles away from using a DSLR flash system.
It has nothing to do with the pure numbers put two pictures aside of each other, whatever format and you’ll immediately notice the difference, more fine definition and microcontrast, a more 3D feeling. Nikon has a very well-implemented 14 bit uncompressed NEF-capability as well. The X-trans just feels a bit ‘flatter’. And still two stops of advantage, less noise, better iso. This is the problem with the Fuji system, it’s delivering a good quality but a lot better exists and in the hype around the X-trans subject some people are really taking reality for dreams.
I agree with X-Proof.
From my side, if I got back one day to professional shooting, I’d buy full frame gear again (D600/800/3s) and decent flash system.
But now, for personal use, I am more than happy to carry an X-M1 + two very bright primes + tele zoom + fisheye + panoramic head + accessories in a 30 x 15 x 15cm bag 🙂
I think you are misusing the “3D and Microcontrast” terminology in grandiose scale.Probably you are narcissistic in traits …..There is more to a picture than megapixel counts and I would prefer Fuji’s tone and colors to Nikon’s at any given second.The feel,the urge,the desire to witness the interaction of light and shadow is far more heightened with a Fuji X Camera than I would ever get with my Nikon D800E. I probably talk rocket science to your limited understanding of the art of photography. But believe me you will get more of what I say with each x-trans shot you take. Unfortunately you don’t own X-Trans capturing device…
Having had a D800 for over a year I can at least speak to a few things. It isn’t 2 stops better but about 1. The resolution is roughly the same but the D800 covers a larger area. The nikon sensors do have some trouble with longer exposures (with excess noise). The “3D feeling” and “microcontrast” are highly subjective and cannot be quantified.
The D800 is a great camera, absolutely, but it doesn’t mean it’s the best for all situations and scenarios.
Well dear, Hood, beside the fact that your reaction is below any level and Patrick should have even removed it, a few answers.
As a photographer with 36 years of experience, I’ve been a wave one Fuji X adopter. One of the very first X100 owners in my country, same with the X-Pro1 and I have almost all lenses, except the 18-55 and of course the 56mm and 10-24mm. I’m using my Nikon gear more or less with the same approach as the Fuji, meaning (almost) no zooms, high end primes in order to achieve the best and sharpest results. That does mean I’m not limiting myself to Nikon glass only.
Having said that, there are about 9-10 commercial IL systems still on the market. Some like Leica M 60 years on the market, Nikon F 55 years, Canon EF 27 years and Sony/Minolta SR-mount 56 years. The Fujifilm XF-mount is not even a full two years on the market and is quite different because it contains a lot of particular hardware and intelligence versus the competition. The optics are out of discussion, they are a solid development, but I’m not feeling so confident about all the rest. The first XF18/35/60 is already aging, the AF has never been fully on par with what we’re used from competition and are in no way equal to what a modern pro-DSLR is able to do. To a certain extend I can live with that, but as an investment it is not very promising. While the glass from the other competitors I mentioned… can still live for many years without finally getting in the trashcan or serving to keep the papers on your desk.
I’ve been defending Fuji against a lot of criticism myself but unfortunately, as well during a number of professional photographic missions and events as with the Fujifilm-organisation itself in my country, I don’t have a ‘waw’ feeling anymore, not at all, and I’m not so sure I would invest in this system if I could redo my decision from two years ago. I’m a bit disappointed. After 13 FW updates I’m finally having a camera now that has an AF the resembles with some goodwill from my side an entry level DSLR from a few years ago.
Regarding the other discussion, it is very difficult to compare camera systems in terms of IQ. I did do some comparisons between the X-Pro1, Leica M9 and the D800. Also using different RAW convertors, LR, C1, Iridient, Aperture (which is my mainstream tool).
The outcome is far from being consistent, but in none of the systems the X-trans is free of problems. For me, LR is the worst. Iridient and Aperture are very equal, at the other end, but still: not perfect. Perfect enough for the most purposes.
I’ve also been comparing the representation of f.i. fine textures by cameras. The D800 beats with a good lens the X-trans easily. In my eyes, the X-Pro1 beats the M9 as well. The images were sharper, but the Leica images have something I cannot express in words, same with the best D800 pictures, something the X-Pro1 is just missing, the X-trans output is just ‘flatter’, not showing the same 3D.
And that is on top of the fact that only a F0.95 can give you the same kind of isolation of subjects you can get with a F1.4 lens in FF. It might not matter for you, but it matters for me. Certainly because I’m shooting mostly in a range between 14 to 50mm and there, the difference is very, very obvious. The 23mm on a Fuji is tack sharp over the whole field as from F4, with my D800 + 35mm I can give a lot more depth.
In my eyes, the Fujifilm X-series are perfect match for the lightweight traveller – the street-photographer or tech-geek that wants to have an advanced system for many random purposes. It pairs a small form factor and weight to an excellent IQ. The best, no, surely not. And there is not only Nikon, there are lot of other systems around, even in MLIC. Optically is Leica the best, no doubt and in my eyes, Fuji failed to compete them by not choosing a FF sensor from day 1.
End of the story… you all invest in what you want. It doesn’t interest me that you even throw your money on the streets or buy some Lomo-gear with it instead of spending it to a premium system. If that’s your art, please don’t leave it for my posts.
The only thing I notice – and that’s also a bit a message for you Patrick – is that there are quite a few agressors on this forum. Telling and stating things that contain no nuance whatsoever, are even beyond any credibility and certainly not based on any facts or experience in the field.
X-Proof, can you please post your so called 3D Picture from Nikon? I never thought Nikon D800 can take 3D pictures…I have shot film mostly for over 30 years and only X-Pro1 files can come close to that. I am willing to switch to Nikon D800 if it does 3D shots…Please help.
Invest in you want, Wandiba and believe in what you want. This is a Fuji fanboy forum and no critics even based on real facts is accepted. Both systems have their competences, but don’t ever believe the stories that the X-trans beats the D800 or the A7R. I can proof that very easily… it just isn’t true and due to the difference in the optical perception there is a very different look in the images, call that 3D or depth in field, or whatever.
You need to try an X-E2 before passing judgment on Fuji X completely. As much as I didn’t want to admit it at first, people are right that Fuji should’ve started off with the X-E2. It is a very responsive camera with a competent AF system. It’s fast but under the right conditions; there are still some low light situations where it won’t AF properly but gone are the days of not at all being unable to AF in low light/low contrast situations. The X-Pro1 even with a gazillion firmware updates will never be as fast as the X-E2 because of the older hardware inside.
And they say that the X-T1 is even faster. I honestly suspect that the X-T1 will quash all concerns about poor AF performance.
But I agree with you that the initial batch of X lenses need a reboot, especially the 35/1.4. Because of their classic designs, their AF would never ever become fast enough.
I’m not going to buy a new Fujifilm camera and according lenses every 18 months. They had their chance, at the end even Leica will be cheaper this way.
High Mp counts have also other benefits except for large print sizes. Post processing heavy applications like architecture photography require lots of resolution in order for you to be able to make accurate and natural looking adjustments. Believe me I know what I am talking about since I shot with a d700 and worked a student job as a photo retoucher for a very succesfull architecture photographer who is shooting with a 40mp MF leaf back, alpa camera and schneider kreuznach lenses. If you compared the files there were huge differences which had a heavy effect on post processing.
Nevertheless I think 16mp for Aps C and 36mp for 35mm seems to be a sweet spot, I highly doubt that most lenses can resolve more than that….
Being used to Nikon D700s I was initially a bit disappointed with the X files (I have the Nikons for pro work, X Pro1 for pleasure).
However when I used Photo Ninja as a raw processor I was delighted with the quality and surprised how much difference the raw processor makes. Now I consider the image quality to be superior to the D700 and heading towards the quality of the newer Nikon sensors.
Now I am seriously tempted to ditch the DSLRs for the new XT1.
Do you have any tips on using Photo Ninja (settings, etc) with X-Trans files? I am considering using it, though I like Capture One.
To be honest I’ve only just played with it so far, but the default settings are an extremely good start, particularly for sharpening.
I need to sit down and spend some time with it, but I love the extra detail that you can get, particularly for soft hair and certain textures, which lifts the results significantly above Lightroom and camera jpegs.
Thank you very much, Fred. I will give it a try. I have heard good things about it, and as a plug-in for Photoshop, it would be more efficient than Capture One and Photoshop.
Hey Fred, I tried Photo Ninja over lunch, and it seems perhaps even bettet than Capture One, which i was already satisfied with. I will try it out some more tonight, but it seems very promissing. Thanks.
right, no afffiliation with new zeland. but I’m glad to hear that you’re making the switch… enjoy the lightness 🙂
Would you recommend the X-T1 for video (over the GH3)? I am having serious doubts!
Really doesn’t look like it!
I was thinking that it might be a good alternative but since release – no way.
GH3 has far better codec, frame rate options, audio tools + exposure control.
It’s made as much for video as stills, Fuji care’s not a bit about video.
I’m wanting the X-T1a hell of a lot but thinking I’ll need another tool for video – Sony RX10 ( worth a look: http://www.cinema5d.com/?p=22136 ) or GH3 if I can afford it. Both have their hickups but offer far better options.
Really disappointing to be honest – but still got to try and get the X-T1 – it’s the stills camera I’ve been waiting for!
I agree.
For secondary tool, what about a very cheap second hand NEX with cheap adapters to use your existing lenses in manual focus?
Patrick, do you have any insight into Fuji’s plans for video (better codecs, 24/25p frame rate options, improved handling of aliasing and moire for example?) Is it possible that this is intended for future firmware updates? As it is, it seems that a state-of-the-art camera in the X-T1 is let down by a 2010 approach to video (which for some of us is central).
sry, no information about it… will investigate.
It takes videos?
Seriously, if you need to do video, you’re better off with just about any other camera, never mind the GH3. Video is Fuji’s weakest point right now.
If X-T1 is this good, I cannot imagine how insanely great X-Pro2 will be!!! I want a X-Pro2 now 😀
Not surprised. As I said earlier, X-T1 is probably the best digital camera ever invented on Earth. It can even challenge Canikon’s flagship cameras like D800, D4, 1dx, etc.
That’s going a bit too far.
I love the X-T1 design a lot, and Fuji X images are great, but I don’t expect it to be as good IQ as those much more costly FF cameras. But good enough for me and many people, yes.
Bang! There it goes again…
Why oh why this need to compete with DSLRs?
X-T1 competes with OM-D E-M1, GH3, A7/A7r, that’s it: all mirrorless.
DSLRs are still vastly superior on many areas for professional use, mirrorless offers different advantages: They are TWO DIFFERENT APPROACHES to photography, which can be integrated in the same market.
The X-T1 will never be able to compete at the same level with D800, D4, 1Dx etc. because those are different tools for different needs/purposes!
The X-T1 will be an awesome camera for some, just another option for others, not enough for others. And that’s the way it should be.
Mirrorless has not matured enough yet to compete with professional DSLRs for speed, flash systems, lens choice (with AF), toughness and durability, etc.
Maybe inna few years mirrorless will become a real alternative for ALL purposes to a DSLR, but not yet.
Just enjoy what the X-T1 can do for you, without having to always look at what others have in their hands!
“Just enjoy what the X-T1 can do for you, without having to always look at what others have in their hands!”
It’s not just a case of looking at what others have in their hands.
There are a lot of us who use big heavy DSLRs for a living who are very keen to ditch what we have in our own hands and replace them with something smaller and more subtle.
The pro world is actually looking at the XT 1 with huge interest. It is clearly far superior to what many of us have been using in the near past with huge advantages over what we use at the present.
I agree with Ricks. IQ may be on par with D800,D4,5diii.
That video sample is bad. So strange. Need more videos. It should be at least as same as X-E1/E2. Check this link for a sample from X-E2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=347B7NxKbS4
The main problem I have with filming with X-E1 is the autofocus. It’s slow and not accurate in video mode.
The Photographyblog wrote “The Fujifilm X-T1 is available in all-black or silver and black“ is that true or is it a mistake. A silver version will be not hurt…
I think they made again a copy&paste error from the X-E2 review (they did the same with the 23mm review, where they copied part of the 14mm review, and forgot to change the figures)
uups! i mean a silver version won´t hurt.
Patrick, what’s the word with the X30? any developmements.
+1
Yes please. Do you have even the slightest tidbit of info to help hold us over on the X30?
The other day I saw a picture in Flickr of an alleged X30. Same design, but without the OVF. Maybe some of the technological advancements of the X-T1’s EVF will be incorporated.
I saw that too, but as someone else pointed out it is likely a photoshopped X10 (as it has an EXR setting on the dial). Also, I’ve never seen a company release a camera with an accessory pack that includes a polarizing filter. After comparing to images with the X10, I have no doubt it’s a fake. Which is unfortunate because I am truly lusting after an X30.
Here’s the link to the Flikr set for anyone who’s interested: http://www.flickr.com/photos/76178219@N07/10053909505/in/photostream/
^ I meant to direct that last post @ Patrick. And thanks for all you do buddy. This site is wonderful.
Is it me or the web compression but the majority of the Xt-1 sample images I have seen look very soft with exception to RIco’s flickr set?
I assume that at base ISO RAW IQ is the same as the XE-2?
Greetings,
Have been shooting 4×5 in nature for over 25 years, often printing 30×40 printsthrough my art gallery. Though with much sight loss, i still have acute feel for composition. But i have struugled to find a packable dslr, mirror or not, that with my limited sight, can operate. I need articulating lcd, cannot see into evf. I need 60p video since deeply attracted to artful slow motion. And one love i have is for great audio. I enjoy my zoom h2n. As my eyes have failed, my ears have become more acute. Now, my major issue that hopefully a user of the x-t1, is how tactile the buttons. I actually purchased a panasonic g6, and totally impossible to feel the buttons. Just close your eyes and try to find and press the buttons. A month ago i had a fuji x-e2 in my hands. Very impressed with its firm tactile click of buttons. Good build, great glass. But sadly no articulating lcd. I have to us combinations of magnifiers. But, and a big but, is the x-t1 that smallish, little camera i can usw for night images, when i want to pack light, in smaller backpack…or oack with zoom h2n in my heavier 4x
Greetings,
Have been shooting 4×5 in nature for over 25 years, often printing 30×40 printsthrough my art gallery. Though with much sight loss, i still have acute feel for composition. But i have struugled to find a packable dslr, mirror or not, that with my limited sight, can operate. I need articulating lcd, cannot see into evf. I need 60p video since deeply attracted to artful slow motion. And one love i have is for great audio. I enjoy my zoom h2n. As my eyes have failed, my ears have become more acute. Now, my major issue that hopefully a user of the x-t1, is how tactile the buttons. I actually purchased a panasonic g6, and totally impossible to feel the buttons. Just close your eyes and try to find and press the buttons. A month ago i had a fuji x-e2 in my hands. Very impressed with its firm tactile click of buttons. Good build, great glass. But sadly no articulating lcd. I have to us combinations of magnifiers. But, and a big but, is the x-t1 that smallish, little camera i can usw for night images, when i want to pack light, in smaller backpack…or oack with zoom h2n in my heavier 4x. Sorry for my poor typing, very difficult. Hope someone can help.
Gary
Pardon me, could not finish my letter…my needs for a camera possibly this fuji x-t1, is certainly replace or compared to my 4×5 resolution. My specific use of the fuji is for extended night exposures, maybe macro very much higher end video/audio in small usaable tactile packable package. Most likely not print larger than 16×20, maybe slightly larger, mostly black and white. . As manual as possible, not ruining my eyes diving into menu. Very difficult to read tiny words.
Very sorry for my confusing request. But i only desire imagery that reflects the reality i can no longer see completely.
Thanks much
Gary
…and i excluded all canons, nikon, olympus, pentax, and sony, except for their a7/a7r…but thir menu diving and jpeg in question. But highly respect fuji imagery, most of my 4×5 lenses are fuji. Plus, i shoot their film. Oh, how i hope the x-t1 fits my rare needs.
Thanks for listening and your assistance,
Gary