Image Courtesy Motimotion.at
Our friend Wolfgang tested two very detailled new Lens tests:
1) Leica M-Summarit 35mm f/2.5 (Click here to read the test)
He tested the lens comparing it with the Zeiss Distagon 35mm f/2.0. The [shoplink 4178]Leica is not a cheap lens ($1500 on eBay)[/shoplink]
2) Voigtländer Super Wide Heliar 15mm f/4.5 (Click here to read the test)
It’s a nice super-cheap wide-angle you cna buy for [shoplink 4177]250 Euro on eBay (Click here to see current auctions).[/shoplink]
4 Responses
That’s really impressive! I have seen it already from my own old Leica R-Lenses that they can’t compete with my Zeiss ZA lenses… But that the difference between an SLR Zeiss lens and a new M-Leica-Lens (which is supposed to be better than any SLR lens due to the shorter rear focal length) is THAT big was new to me….
Thanks Wolfgang for testing!
PS: Would be interesting to see the how the kit zoom 18-55 behaves in comparison to the Summarit…
I’m amazed! Just awesome brick wall…
maybe it is ´expensive´ for NEX-photographers, but not for leica-shooters…
lol, look at the shadows for the two tests. they are completely differnt. Did he go eat between the two tests?