What a great rumor start in this new week :)!
The Chinese site xjrumo (tranlsation) confirms the FR-rumor posted here about an X-E1 replacement. According to them it will be called X-E1S and feature the X-Trans sensor II of the X100S!
One more hint that we could have an X-E2/X-E1S by the end of 2013/early 2014.
cheers
Patrick
X-deals
Remember that until September 21 you can save up to 1,150 if you purchase the X-E1 with 5 XF lenses. You can switch cheap to the X-system, save a lot on the primes and the 18-55… and if rumors turn out to be true, sell your X-E1 or use it as a backup camera.
You can find the deals here: AmazonUS: Fuji X-E1 / Fuji X-PRO1 – BHphoto: Fuji X-E1 / Fuji X-PRO1 – Pictureline: Fuji X-E1 / Fuji X-PRO1 – Adorama: Fuji X-E1 / Fuji X-PRO1
XF 23mm
The brand new XF 23mm is not included in this offer. You can pre-order it here: USA: AmazonUS / BHphoto / Adorama / Pictureline EUROPE: PCHstore / wexcamerasDE / wexphotographicUK
At Rico’s Flickr here you can see the first samples taken with the XF 23mm. On September 13 there will be an X-pert corner first look about his lens… so stay tuned
109 Responses
very very well… I see a lot of “hot deals” for for x-e1+kit
and used x-e1 price falling down soon
Yes.
Not so sure I need the Trans II sensor, unless they’ve made it way better at autofocus.
Well, that’s the idea.
This new “version” of the sensor (if it’s the same as the one inside the X100s) will allow phase based autofocus and digital split image manual focus. Therefore a better autofocus performance is likely.
so sheer IQ wise , is the X100s sensor any better than the X-E1 sesnor?
So a cheaper X-E1 might be the go!
what’s different in X-Trans II from X-Trans (one?) ?
Pretty much only the autofocus. Personally, I wouldn’t recommend updating from the X-E1 just for that unless AF has caused someone to miss a lot of pictures. It’s a tiny upgrade. I’d say the next big jump will be the X-Pro2 whenever that comes out.
The article did not say the sensor was the only upgrade. The x100s is better than the x-e1 in many other ways (EVF, responsiveness from faster processor, better raw files, better auto iso). Many of these features will probably be included, making the x-e1s a no brainer upgrade for me at least. The 18-55 lens on an x100s type camera would be a very speedy combo.
The 24MP sensor on the other hand would not excite me, just bigger files to deal with for no benefit.
there is a 16MP Sensor in the X100S…
It uses the sensor from x100s, therefore it has the PDAF, split image focus assist etc, of course faster AF speed at least like the x100s
This is needed PDAF. C AF is about worthless as it is now.
Is the AF in that X100s that much better than the AF in X-E1 and X-Pro 1? I haven’t seen any comparisons between the Af between the X100s and X-pro 1 and X-E1 after the latest firmware update.
Yes, it is. I have both and the X100S is definitely an improvement.
@ Neil, JC, Jon R – thank you
bah wait for a nex FF and you will save a lot of headache
i wait tv sony 2k 🙂 this is very good
SAR commenters trolling on FR boards? welcome Hendrick 😉
looks like this isn’t the Hendrick I had in my mind, probably different one
and then, you can wait long nights hoping that Sony deliver the lenses too…
So true. And cheaper plastic lenses at the same XF price points, at that.
But not take very many pictures which is sort of the point of photography, not just gear.
this hendrick guy is a total troll. he goes around every site and says things like this and even worth in some cases. his mum or his sisi may be sleeping with Sony’s executive so he wants to show sony’s chief that he is so proud of what he is doing to his sisi by helping him to do free trolling for him. have you heard me Hendrick and go back to SAR site? trash.
i know every body is entitled to their own opinion.. so heres mine.. sony trolls leave and stop posting your silly comments like.. wait for the nex ff… i know… how about i wait 10 years before I upgrade because that camera will be better than the one coming out tomorrow.. go and post on your sony forums and leave ours to people who genuinely want to discuss fuji, this forum is for people who like fuji, who love fuji and who buy fuji…
The af on the x100s is great. It’s probably the only camera I’m ever going to carry with me regularly from now on. The electronic view finder is from a different planet compared to that in the xe1 and pro for that matter…so if the upgrade includes the new evf, as well as the processor, it’s essentially a new camera. Upgrading depends if you want an improvement or if you like to ‘manage’ with what you have…a lot of x100 purists said they wouldn’t upgrade to the s, but for me they’re like comparing an apple with an orange…completely different..
hmm interesting, I thought the EVF unit is the same on X100S as on X-E1 (I have X-Pro1 and X100 so don’t know)
is new to me that EVF X100S is different from x-e1 ….. mah!
It’s is indeed a different EVF – LED on the XE1/XP1 vs LCD on X100s…same resolution tho. haven’t peeked thru the X100s yet myself (waiting for mine still) but several reviews have claimed a better experience…
To be honest I think, the X-E1 EVF has better contrast and colors than the one on the X100s. HOWEVER due to the newer, faster processor on the X100s there is much less lag, especially in dimmer light ans when panning. This makes it nicer in use but not better per se IMO.
@James – it’s for sure a different kind of apple but saying the X100 is an orange may be a bit too much.
I don’t consider myself as a “purist” and I’d love to have some of the X100s improvements but I’m not upgrading for the time being and X100 still produce pictures as good as before. Maybe I’ll buy a new version X-Pro1 or even X-E1 (being called it 2 or S) and I’ll wait for the next generation of the X100.
The EVF on the X100S does have a smoother refresh rate than the X-E1, but technically this is a benefit of it’s faster processor not of the EVF display itself. I have both cameras and the EVF display panel quality is similar with the edge going to the X-E1 for better contrast.
Not worth upgrading just for the X100s sensor, at least not for me. I have no problems focusing, my only problem is handing my camera to someone to take my picture and expect a non-fuji owner to focus it properly. I can easily skip the next upgrade and wait a few years when my XE1 is old.
I’m kind of hoping that they include face detect af in the next XE1 and Xpro 1 like in the XM1. I’m having the same problems when I give my camera to someone else.
If they do release the E1 with a sensor bump only, I wonder if some of the existing lenses will be fast enough motor wise to take advantage of the PDAF based autofocus?
Hope they can bring out something new, either FF or an x30 with 4/3 mount would be interesting. Was in the local electronic store, the smaller systems are quite amazing … and seem to get more floor space. All the Fuji (and Sony/Oly) stuff was behind glass. – the EOS M was on the floor display, just pick it up and use it. Neat camera. Perhaps they will put the A1 on the floor so that people even stop to look at what fuji has to offer.
Okay, let’s everybody take a deep breath.
This is a rumor about a rumor from a Chinese website (one guy/gal?) who may or may not have solid information. We don’t know where he even claims to have gotten the information nor do we (so far as I know) have any track record re his (or her?) predictions in the past.
And yes, I know that rumor websites (including this one) aren’t held to the same journalistic standards as the New York Times, but this Chinese source is, until we have further independent and reliable confirmation, the functional equivalent of some guy you met in a bar last night.
+1
+2
BUT, I agree about a m4/3 mount X-Trans, if possible. It would provide an avenue to more people heavily invested in m4/3 to try X-Trans, and an incentive to switch: only need a new body, and not new lenses.
This wouldn’t be interesting at all for Fuji.
They would have to split their ressources to launch new m4/3 lenses (companies don’t make enough money from camera bodies only).
If they make money at all, it would be worth it merely to expand the userbase. If the X-Trans quality really is measurably better, then a nontrivial proportion of those customers would eventually switch bodies as well, to use the high quality Fuji lenses.
I would disagree for two reasons. Firstly they have the x20 which is the right form factor and sensor size (more or less), and the XF1 which is comparable to the cheaper Oly PL5.
Secondly the one thing Fuji is really good at is putting out variations on the same thing. That’s their business model, take a platform and make lots of cameras out of it.
For that market, they don’t really need anything other than a kit lens or two. Not a big deal for a company like Fuji with that new factory in Thailand.
In fact, there could be some interest in Fuji glass from existing 4/3 owners, if Fuji can bring something special to that format.
Just a thought … there were no X bodes on the showroom floor, all behind glass, puts them out of reach of so many lower end customers with sub 400 budgets. But Oly (PL5) and Canon (EOS M) were there and those cameras made a good impression.
and literally MFT is a dead or almost dead system , so noone wants to waste his or her money on that system.
On one hand this rumour seems plausible: The sales of the X-E1 certainly reduced sales of the X-Pro1. If the X-E1 only added the new AF and kept the rest, and a X-Pro 2 would have a new 24MP sensor, there would be more people who’d get the premium model.
I have the X-E1 and will not upgrade to X-E2 just for PDAF.
+1
It makes no sense to me to release an updated E1 with a 16M sensor, regardless of any other changes. Perhaps with one exception, that Fuji would want to differentiate on price against a Pro model that would cost significantly more, then it might make sense.
Based on how Fuji plays the market, would almost put money on it.
And this has to do with your favorite children now — the Oly and Canon — how???
weird comment. The XE1 was a descendant of the XP1 at a smaller size and more affordable price. Saying that sales of the XE-1 “took away” sales of the XP1 is like saying that Toyota Corolla sales take away Camry sales. They are both cars but have different target audiences. And I don’t agree that bumping the mp count to 24 on any new version of XP1 is going to be reason for more people to opt for the P1 over the E2…each will have its own market share for different reasons. Some of you guys seem to think that manufacturers are playing Battleship with their own product lines (as forum people love to do) when in fact they are adding different models to cover a wider audience appeal.
‘When’ it comes, the new xe1 WILL have a new sensor. But that won’t be it’s only improvement. For Pete’s sake, people! It will have a whole raft of improvements – give Fuji some credit. Porsche are the only company in the world who could dare to get away with such an audacity – to give you a meagre upgrade and call it a new model! But, don’t get carried away on this rumour of a rumour, as somebody above has aptly described this post…
Sweet! I am ready to buy a X-E2 or X-Pro2 – would prefer the latter though.
Can’t wait to get rid of my X-E1, but it won’t be for the X-E1S, it will be for the new Sony NEX FF with Zeiss lens. Large full frame sensor with sharp Zeiss lens, it will be unbeatable, sending Fuji back to the minor leagues.
I am pretty sure the Fuji will be more affordable, but hey, there’s plenty of (more expensive) stuff from Leica, Nikon, Canon, Sony, Phase One etc. already available TODAY that beats Fuji’s IQ or AF among other things. The only relevant question is: Which solution provides the best overall value to a particular customer, and the answer depends on the individual and their needs.
Sony are NOT going full frame for a CSC style camera.. The moving to very small mirrorless DSLR
Sounds good Vytas… Meanwhile we will all be shooting with our sharp Fuji and Zeiss lenses on our Fuji cameras… Have fun waiting for your non-existent gear!
Wow the Sony spam farm is really doing well here.
Enjoy your 3000$ body and your 1500$ zeiss lenses for 0.8% more DOF
You have to understand that 5,6,7 k for a hobby don’t mean shit for many people. Only thing Fuji has on Sony now is the hybrid viewfinder. If we talking upgrade then yes the FF nex is the next big thing. 0.8% more DOF? I own both x100s and rx1, there is much more to it than 0.8% more DOF.
Now I know why your name is LOL. Too funny!!!
I have the RX1R too and it is incredibly good , in fact it’s replaced my D800E and D600 at once(I kept my 5D3 and A99v for action type of works, though).
I am really interested in Fuji cause I like the Fuji color but I am not sure the AF is good enough for me, I mean not the sheer speed but accuracy.’
so , iyo, how do they compare the X100s and RX1R (I mean AF accuracy and speed)?
@ Derek. Rent the x100s and see for yourself. Why ask others for an opinion when only you can determine “accuracy” yourself? Lens rentals.com. And BTW the accuracy is very good and no less than other manufactures cameras. Why you’d want the x100s at all when you have the RX1R at the same focal length is a different matter. Seems like you’re all set in the 35mm range already.
Well, I guess it is nice to be able to spend 7k on a hobby, and while it “don’t mean shit” for you, for me (and most people) it does. Fuji’s IQ is already on par with most FF systems today and by looking at the greater picture, it’s just a better cost efficient one. While Fuji keeps putting out terrific glass, Sony lags behing with its below average consumer lenses. Fast primes? nah. Fast zooms? nah. Affordable Zeiss? hell no. I mean, if you can’t afford Zeiss there is really no reason to get into Sony, FF or not.
Nice work, Patrick!
the only reason that would make me consider moving to a newer version would the a higher/better viewfinder frame rate.
You better start saving, then. 😉
😀
oh no… (yes!) 😉
It will take some time, Sony needs to see that the sales of their new cameras are going well and only then they will produce for Fuji the “new” sensor. (nex-6′ sensor which can also be found in x100s)
In other words, if you’re a Fuji customer and you want to upgrade to a new sensor, you have to wait for it to be old tech 🙂
I love Fuji, they can sell anything to the right people.
Used cars from the 60’s, Old Sony sensors whatever you want.
“We have a magical camera with the best IQ ever, but the IQ cannot be compared to other cameras because it is so special and magical that no benchmark software can understand its magic”.
“for now its magic can only be expressed through our JPEG, but soon every 3rd party software will provide this magic too”,
Two years have passed and the 3rd party software is still questionable.
The king is naked guys and you should thank god that Fuji did not decide to sell you some land on the moon…
Whatever makes you feel superior .. surely, good photographs can only be taken with the latest sensor.
Haven’t had your meds yet?
“Me” obviously doesn’t read much.
Well I’m glad to here the are thinking of using X-E1s instead X-E2. That’s what I’ve been calling it for months. Bring it on. For the new camera offering the X100s feature upgrades make sense. But what “extras” will the add to the Pro version?
We all knew an X-E1 upgrade was coming, with PDAF, faster sensor, better processor, and split-screen focusing in tow. The only question was when.
Now, if they give me a choice of colors for focus peaking, it’ll be time for my NEX-7 with its laggy controls and poor menus to start warming the bench.
I agree Casaubon, but I think now is time to put that nex-7 on the bench… I just sold my nex-7 on craigslist and picked up the X-M1 while I wait for the X-Pro2, meanwhile I am enjoying the Fuji glass, I couldn’t be happier. The controls are snappier and the build quality is above the nex. Plus, Fuji has some superior lenses imo, the 35 f1.4 is faster and very sharp.
I was thinking about this. Can you compare the X-M1 AF to the X100s? Does the X-M1 have PDAF?
Actually, since it is only $100 less and loses the EVF, I don’t think it is worth it to me. It does gain the Wi-Fi and tiltable LCD. It doesn’t mention X-Trans II so I imagine it does not have the PDAF?
I do not have experience with the X100s but I can tell you my real life experience with the X-M1 showed it has decent AF but not great. It would fail with sports… It does not have the X-trans II but it does have the EXR II Processor so it seems to be a bit quicker in processing regards compared to X-E1 but that is negligible.
The Wi-Fi is mostly a novelty as you cannot transfer raw images, only jpeg and the process is not that simple. The tilt screen IS a welcome addition as it allows me to shoot from the hip instead of up high near my eye. Hope they add Tilt Screen to the upcoming models. Viewfinder has not bothered me as much as I thought but I am using the X-M1 until the XPro is updated and know I will be getting a viewfinder then.
Depends on what you shoot but the X-M1 is not for everyone… To me the real deal is the X-M1 is perfect for attaching excellent glass to and that I can take everywhere and not feel like I am lugging a giant dslr around. The switch from Sony nex-7 to Fuji was purely due to lens quality and lens speed. The 35 f1.4 on the Fuji has killer results and IMO it is better than having my big nikon and 50 f1.4 attached due to portability.
Spot on lettherebelight. Fuji glass is the main reason to buy into the X system. Compared to the Nex lenses they are significantly better. I sold my Nex 7 and lenses a while back now after getting the X Pro1, including the Zeiss 24. Their long lenses were a bit of an embarrassment compared to Canon (100-400L) but the Fuji 55-200 is it’s equal.
Camera bodies will come and go but the quality pro glass will remain. I haven’t got the time to wait around for Sony to understand the importance of a good selection of pro glass never mind waiting for them to come up with the goods.
Thanks! Same here, just sold my 6D plus L lenses. I mostly do travel photography, architecture, and family photography. The main thing about slow autofocus that impacts me is fast moving kids, so hopefully autofocus speeds continue to get better, but even the X100s is not nearly as fast as a SLR, so I’m not really holding my breath. Ultimately though I realized that Fuji has really good lenses and APS-C keeps getting better and better, and keeps the costs, size and weight more reasonable, compared with full frame.
My question is will there be more differentiation between the X-E1s and the future X-Pro1 update? Currently I don’t see enough to differentiate the price between the X-E1 and X-Pro1 so I would assume the new pro model to have a few more upgraded features. Perhaps the X-Pro2/X-Pro1s will have a full frame organic sensor… hmmmm… I am happy with what Fuji is doing and love what they are bringing to market in terms of lenses!
I very much doubt it will be full frame and, to be honest, I’d be happy for them to stick with the current size. This way I don’t have to re-invest in a second set of lenses.
That said, and organic sensor at 20-24Mp would be very nice. Provided the noise control was either the same or better. The extra resolution would be handy, the 16Mp is right on the edge for some agencies and upsizing is required if you need to crop the image a bit. 6000×4000 would be more than enough though.
Nice, but I think I’ll wait for the X-E2s
X-Pro1 is good enough for me now. I can’t imagine myself upgrading unless it would be worth it. Currently all cameras in given price range and offering 16Mp sensors can provide comparable results. The only one which stands out up to ISO400-800 is Sigma with their Merrill series cameras.
If Fuji decides to go FF or they will introduce revolutionary sensor that would provide visible improvement and would come in similar form actor as X-Pro1, then I might upgrade. Until then I guess I’m done with camera purchases.
It would make no sense for Fuji to release the updated X-E1 before the update of the X-Pro2.
For marketing reasons the X-Pro1 succesor HAS to come first.
If it does not then a large number of people who would buy the X-Pro2 will say “Hey, I could wait for the X-Pro2, but the X-E2 is here NOW and its CHEAPER!”
And I am one of those people! 🙂
We know aproximately what the upgrades will be in both cameras: better viewfinder or screen, faster AF with phase detection, split image foucsing, improved processor, new button layout (on X-Pro2 at least) and there may or may not be an increase in sensor resolution.
The differences between the X-E2 and X-Pro2 will – as far as we can know – continue to be minor i.e. hybrid OVF vs EVF, flash, more metal, size, price.
The differences are not huge unless you are sure you want the OVF and they are easily ignored when the choice is cheaper X-E2 today or more expensive X-Pro2 with only a possibility of some surpise features at some point in the future.
The 2nd gen. X-Pro is going to be a fantastic product just like the 2nd gen X100, to maximize their income it has to be released first.
Issue is that the Pro looked old quickly after x100s and X-E1 improvements.
So one benefit of releasing the Pro2 second is that they can ensure it has all the learnings from the X-E2, and then some!
+1 …I think personally its better to release the X-E1s before the X pro2. The order in which the X-E1 was released after the Xpro1 with a spec slighter higher in some areas was not ideal considering the Xpro1 was the X systems flagship model.
Better to have the X-E1 released with the current upgrades available in the x100s….then further upgrade again later to the Xpro 2 which by having a later release date will have the very latest tech.
Regardless of when it happens and in what order, I’m curious about the price of the new gear. Can they go back to $1399 for an updated X-E1s kit? I suspect they’d get backlash if it’s not priced at the currently accepted $1199.
What was the price of the x100 prior to the x100s release?
Personally I can’t see myself upgrading from the X-E1 for a long time, I’m still getting to grips with all the functionality!
Yeah…a Sony ff will put Fuji in their place…oh wait, they already have..the RX1. That fixed em! Or not. Haven’t yet heard a pro rubbish the X series, in fact they only seem to love it. Maybe they should pay more attention to Sony fanboys or the man in the moon who seems to think Fuji know nothing. Heck, Fuji should hire him….or maybe Budweiser instead. The rest of us can just enjoy what Fuji are giving us. Naked or clothed 😉
All the ‘worms’ are coming out of the woodwork aren’t they..
They’re absurd…look, what are the people who really ARE in the know saying? The pros who’ve bought, borrowed or used an X series are unanimous in their praise. Are you going to listen to them or some anonymous troll? “No, dude/bro/man, Fuji’s crap, I get better pictures on my PS3. Leica’s crap too y’know?” Patrick, you have my sympathies :-\
then you can stick with your crappy x100 while we get hellof rx1 FF XD
Mark, I wouldn’t worry, people like “manamana” will always come around to try and do other brands down to make them feel more secure about their own purchases. The fact of the matter is that like myself, many other people who make a living from photography have tried a lot of different systems and know they are talking through their…….
I had the Canon 5dmkii and loved the quality but I wanted to reduce the weight while out taking climbing shots. I did try a Nex 7 and bought most of the lenses, including the Zeiss 24 but the autofocus and lens quality was poor compared to Canon. I have since migrated to an X Pro1 with all bar the 18mm lens and the image quality is a match for the Canon. The autofocus is marginally slower than the Nex 7 but far more accurate. The X Pro is also performing very well as a studio camera…. something that the Nex7 was no good at all for. Way to small and fiddly, lack of manual controls etc.
sony trolls be gone! leave our fuji site for fuji lovers! if your sony’s are so good than why are you on this site checking up on what fuji are doing! obviously you need to reassure yourself that you made the right choice and try and inflict your opinion on everyone else.. you can think your self all high and mighty up in your consumer market throne labelled sony but dont come around here and tell us how useless our cameras are and how yours are full frame and blah blah blah blah blah blah… go outside and enjoy your camera if it is as perfect as you proclaim.. leave us fuji lovers to our own devices and we can all enjoy this awesome site!!
What does “get hellof rx1” mean? In English? And who told you the x100 was crappy? A Sony forum? Or did you work it out all by yourself? Maybe all those pros are wrong and you’re right! Or do you just like putting down a brand YOU, in your wisdom, didn’t choose? I hope you enjoy your rx1, i really do. Just don’t come on like a sugared up monosyllabic teen. You do yourself no favours. Or anyone else on a FUJI forum.
Fuji, please put a Flip-Screen on that thing and it’s perfect 😉
I have to say, there is absolutely zero useful information here. Bunch of morons calling names and arguing about preference. Why is it so hard to understand logically you can not tell a person apple is better than orange when he likes orange. He is never right, your are never right, it is just preference and a waste of time to talk about. If you are going to comment, ask your self this. “what can others gain from reading my comment” if the answer is jack shit, than just like real life, STFU.
To me it makes sense to issue a XE1s, then the Xpro2 with all the upgrades, more pixels etc, followed by a six month gap before the XE2, I think that gap is what Fuji has in mind, otherwise they would need to launch the Xpro2 and XE2 together and if the cameras are only differentiated by the OVF Fuji would loss XPro2 sales to XE2. By issuing a intermediary model with Phase, Min ISO and face detection, linked AE to Focus point etc, the XE1s won’t appear so out of date compared to the other cameras in the range x100s and M and will be all the camera many need. Others of course won’t be able to resist and upgrade to XPro2 and others will need to wiggle their thumbs waiting for the XE2.
For me the x-e1 (s) will have 20 megapixels too…. a goog reason to upgrade any x-e1 or x-pro1
Admin, Patrick, is it safe to assume that collaboration between Panasonic and Fuji on the sensor front could see its fruits in the replacement of X-Pro1 or it will, at first, be implemented to smaller sensors?
We won’t see the organic sensor before late 2014, but more likely 2015. It depends on when Fuji is going to replace the X-Pro, and I hope it will happen earlier than 2015. So my guess is that it won’t feature the organic sensor. But it’s just a personal supposition
thank you Patrick
I would _love_ to see more leaf shutter models. That would be a real choice; x-pro1s & x-pro1l(eaf) to choose from ! Simply love the quietness of x100.
Or is it technically impossible to have it in a camera with changeable lenses?
Leaf shutters are located inside of the lens not the bodies. So what you really want is to have existing lens re-released with built-in shutters.
Ok, that’s what I was afraid of. Thanks for the reply anyway! Future idea for a small or brave company?
Izel Photography…you mentioned the X-Pro1 in the studio. You might like to have a look at this http://www.prophotonut.com/2013/02/17/film-noir-a-hollywood-style-reborn/ It makes for interesting reading too. And lol…stop calling us names lol! Don’t get mad, I’m just messing with you 😉
Some beautiful shots there. Love the style and demonstrates what can be done with these cameras!
yep, Damien is very accomplished photographer, I suggest to check other entries too.
His colour scheme / system for his studio is good. I’ll be re-decorating the room I use as a studio later this year so that was very useful.
Perhaps this is the wrong place to post this but I highly recommend everyone read this blog post from Kevin Mullens (http://bit.ly/15QB52j) about his recent trip to Fuji HQ.
Fuji are listening and I would like to thank Kevin, Zack, David and Bert for giving Fuji feedback.
Sorry, that should of been Kevin Mullins (typo)
i hope it’s just a simple update to xe1s. i still very much in love with my XE1 and dont want any distraction!
from business point of view, i think XE2 will be launch either after or the same time as X-Pro 2.
of course, if they want to make a X-pan 3 in digital, that will be even better !