Fujifilm X30 in stock check: USA: BHphoto / Adorama / AmazonUS / BestBuy / EUROPE: wexUK / wexDE / PCHstore
_ _ _
Quick focus, long battery life, sharp images even at ISO1600, detailed images with rich saturated colours typical of Fujifilm… overall, there is a lot to like on the Fujifilm X30, says ephotozine here. At the end of their review they posted a very long list of PROS, and just 2 CONS: the price and that RAW is not available in some modes.
They end up highly recommending this camera giving it 4.5 stars out of 5.
And if the price is the only thing that is holding you back from purchasing this camera, check out the offer on the [shoplink 28918 ebay]black X30 (8 available here)[/shoplink] and on the [shoplink 28919 ebay]silver X30 (8 available here)[/shoplink]. EbayUS store cameraland sells it with a $70 price drop for $529!
[shoplink 28918 ebay]
[/shoplink]
13 Responses
DOA with its tiny tiny sensor for $599
And your considered opinion come after precisely how many hours of use with the X30? I am guessing possibly somewhere around ‘no’ hours. Websites may have their own agenda and biases, but I’m figuring that if someone reviews a thing and posts examples of that thing in use, then he or she has actually used it. To me, that gives their conclsions an order of magnitude more credibility than someone who is just repeating their own little diatribe without any hands-on practical experience of the thing being tested.
But hey, that’s just me. Are their any other things you have zero experience of with which you’d like to share? A way or resolving the tensions in the Levant, perhaps? Or, maybe you have a cure for Ebola that no one’s thought up. The world needs more worthless, ill-informed, undernourished opinion, so please continue.
I think new Hino city buses suck. Low floor too night. AC is cheap. But I can’t drive bus so I just parret what people think in bus forums. ^_^ still if X30 works as well as my X20 but with better viewfinder then no surprise they are sellin well desu.
/Anerican sarcasm end
Edit: oops correct word parret.
A website designed to make money from people clicking through to buy new cameras cites another website designed to make money from people clicking through to buy new cameras, and both recommend that people buy a new camera.
I go to a car dealer and he recommends I buy a new Chevy, and puts me in touch with a custom shop that puts special seats in Chevies, and both recommend I buy a new Chevy.
Conclusion: That Chevy must be some great car.
c’mon ronin, you can troll better… be creative, and don’t repeat always the same sentence 😉
FYI: “Fujirumors recommends: [Don’t pre-order the X30] Wait a bit… maybe we could soon have a nice price drop on it” http://www.fujirumors.com/low-sales-fujifilm-x30-71th-ps-digital-camera-ranking/
You realize my friend that ‘trolling’ means more than just any post that one happens to disagree with, right? Or was there something inaccurate in my statement?
It’s possible for civilized and polite people to disagree, I’m sure you’ll agree, without having to label the other?
LOL… “disagree”
nah, you can do better, c’mon.
OK, so you don’t disagree with me, fair enough. And can’t say that anything I said was untrue.
Then I guess I misunderstood your concern. Your concern was that I had allegedly restated an observation I had in the past.
And yet the comments here are constantly repetitious, discussing the same topics and points over and over and over again. And only I get called out?
Patrick, you provide a valuable service here, and I respect the effort you put into it. I appreciate that effort. You have every right to make money on your blog. But if all of us always have to agree 100% of the time with the editorial opinion, we lose a heck of a lot of value.
Ronin, looking at your comment history, it’s clear that you don’t like Fujifilm and this blog. I’d say 99,9% of your comments are against the company or my blog (a part the comments to the article, where I wrote that the price of the X30 is too high, you agreed there).
Although you viciously ranted against my blog or Fujifilm, I never said something.
But I say it for you, it’s getting ridiculous. As when you ranted against me and Kai (digitalrev), just because Kai said he liked the X100T, and I linked to his review. And you said (again) Kai talks good because he wants to sell cameras, and I link to him because I want to sell cameras.
But honestly, Kai destroyed for example the Nikon DF when it came out… so the truth is, he says what he wants. If he’d said the X100T is shit, I’d have posted that…
and what about TheCamerastoreTV, when they said the new viewfinder in the X100T is useless? I put that sentence in the headline and let my readers know.
So, my friend, as long as you have some real arguments to criticize Fujifilm or FR, let them coming. But you accuse this blog and reviewers who talk good about Fuji cameras to lack of objectivity. That’s ridiculous. Make well founded critics, you can do that, otherwise it will appear that your raison d’être here is to troll.
@ronin: If you want to be taken serious, you should stop posting the same nonsense over and over again. Post constructive criticism and no one will call you a troll.
Would you be happy if every review said Fuji cameras suck. Go buy Pentax?!
Chevy? You can do better than a crappy yankee brand. Real cares come from Italy and Germany.
If I were to compare the X30 against (for example) the Canon S200 I would probably get to the same verdict (many “pros” with the major “con” being price).
Also: “f/1.8 4x optical zoom lens” whereas the X30 has a f/2.0-2.8 zoom???
It’s not a bad camera as far as I can tell, it’s just that for me there are more interesting ones in this segment.