Advertisement
SNAPCLOUDBack up every photoUnlimited RAW storage, 30 days freeTry freeSample ad
Advertisement
Advertisement

first impressions/reviews: XF 55-200 + Touit 32mm + SLR Magic 23mm

 photo dont-obey-thumb_zpsb034f495.jpg

image courtesy: luminous landscape

1) – luminous landscape (click here) posted the very first shots and impressions of the 55-200 (in hand, bokeh, stabilization).  Here is his what they say about the image posted above (bokeh):

“This shot surprised me. I normally don’t think too much about bokeh when it comes to long zooms. I’m not sure why; maybe because I’m often disappointed. But in this case when the lens is focused as close as possible and the background is at infinity, I was very pleased with the shape of the diaphragm blades as well as the smoothness of the OOF areas.”

2) – thephoblographer posted his 32mm first impressions here. Fantastic build quality, very sharp, superb bokeh! He also says that:

“This was the first ime that I ever used a lens made by Zeiss that had autofocus. It was decent. It works quickly in well-lit situations but in low light, it was lacking at times. The Zeiss 32mm f1.8 occasionally focus-hunted. When I used the focus assist light of the Fujifilm X Pro 1, it made things better. It was easier to focus the lens manually when in low light. When working with the Touit 32mm f1.8, outside on the terrace of our meeting space and on the High Line, the auto focus was fantastic and precise.”

–  diglloyd posted an portrait shot with the 32mm here and if you want to see the bokeh click here.

3) lifeispixels posted his SLR Magic Noktor 23mm (Adorama) f1.7 review here. For the complete specs click here. From the conclusions:

“I’m surprised to see how well it controls CA and flare. Do NOT expect the same resolving power at wide open like the Fujinon lenses. Wide open, it’s a soft, less contrasty lens. At f1.7, it’s only good for close to medium, while poor to resolve details at far to infinity range. […] For the price at 399 USD including shipping, this is a viable option for any Fuji X user looking for a fast 35mm equivalent MF prime, since Fuji hasn’t released the 23mm f1.4 yet and I expect the price to be at least 2 times more than Noktor 23mm f1.7. There aren’t any alternative for a 23mm lens this fast for the Fuji X users at this point, as far as I know and that will require an adapter. Everyone would agree that the new Fujinon is going to be optically better and I’m eager to see how much better it can be. Until that time comes, I’m having fun with Noktor and will spend more time learning to squeeze the best out of this lens, despite some quirks paring with Fuji X-E1 camera.”

XF 55-200 pre-order: USA: BHphoto / Adorama / AmazonUS / DigitalRev / Uniquephoto / Pictureline / Europe: AmazonUK / AmazonDE / PCHstore Brussel

Zeiss Touit 32mm pre-order: USA: Adorama / BHphoto / Uniquephoto / Pictureline / Europe: AmazonDE / ebayUK / PCHstore Brussel

Zeiss Touit 12mm pre-order: USA: Adorama / BHphoto / Uniquephoto / Pictureline / Europe: AmazonDE / ebayUK / PCHstore Brussel

SLR Magic Noktor 23mm f1.7: Adorama

Share this story
Community

Join the discussion

5 Responses

  1. After reading the comment, ‘normally I Do not think about bokeh with long zooms’ it felt that the reviewer lacked any practial experience and should not be judging anything. Long focal lengths, zoom or prime, is often about bokeh. My Nikon 70-200 f/2.8 VR I is a cream machine for bokeh and the reason why I purchased it in 2005 and still have it. I have other longer zooms for wildlife and the quality of the background blur helps make the shot. It is not the main use of the lens but it is very useful.

    Anyway, bokeh is often one of the considerations, along with sharpness and other factors when considering a lens, espcially a long lens or a fast lens. If bokeh never crossed his mind then that wreaks of inexperience. Just my take, the important thing is it looks pretty darn good 🙂

    1. Practical experience ? I think luminous landscape has been on the web talking about photography since you were still learning to walk. But yeah sure. 😛

  2. Hello Patrick I have just read this review and i dont understand this :

    http://www.techradar.com/reviews/cameras-and-camcorders/cameras/compact-cameras/fuji-x100s-1122175/review/6#articleContent

    There’s plenty of detail in the feathers of this duck, although there are some artefacts in the highlights of the JPEG file – but they are only visible if you pixel peep.

    So what i dont understand is how the jpeg files show some artifacts ? maybe the raw
    i thought it was fixed with the new sensor and new processor.

    The test was wrong ?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search

Search
Advertisement
SNAPCLOUDBack up everyphotoTry freeSample ad

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

*Please also check your spam folder if you don't get the confirmation mail. And mark the mail as "non-spam" to see the future newsletter.

Advertisement
PHOTOGEARUp to 30%off camerasSee dealsSample ad
Advertisement
PHOTOGEARUp to30% offcamerasSee dealsSample ad
Advertisement
GRIPLINEPro camerastraps &bagsDiscoverSample ad