Advertisement
SNAPCLOUDBack up every photoUnlimited RAW storage, 30 days freeTry freeSample ad
Advertisement
Advertisement

A Happy Easter time to all SAR readers!

Dear SAR readers!

I wish all of you a happy time with your families and friends. I will have a long dinner with my parents and you might excuse me if I am not going to post any news or rumors today 🙂

Enjoy your time and take nice pictures! Feel free to post the links as a comment to that post.

P.S.: You sent me many links to news reviews and new videos during the last week. I will all post them starting from tomorrow! Thanks for your very precious help!

Share this story
Community

Join the discussion

8 Responses

  1. I can’t decide and I need help. If only allowed 1 major purchase this year, am I better off getting a 2470z and holding on to my a200 until next year or getting the a77? Thoughts?

    1. The 135mm ZA is a lens worth saving for.

      For low light around normal range, you can get any combination of 35 1.8, 50 1.8, and 85 2.8, compact package, affordable, sharp, fast.

      24mm on aps-c is not that wide anyway. So if it was me, i’d get those affordable fast primes, and save my money for the 135 ZA.

  2. A200 is not a full frame camera. The 24-70 was designed to be a full frame camera lens. I would definitely purchase the a77, do some research on kurt munger’s website. It’s like wanting to put expensive race tires on an old rusty car… it’s nice it may be improve performance but in the end it still non-sense …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search

Search
Advertisement
SNAPCLOUDBack up everyphotoTry freeSample ad

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

*Please also check your spam folder if you don't get the confirmation mail. And mark the mail as "non-spam" to see the future newsletter.

Advertisement
SNAPCLOUDBack up everyphotoTry freeSample ad
Advertisement
Advertisement