Advertisement
SNAPCLOUDBack up every photoUnlimited RAW storage, 30 days freeTry freeSample ad
Advertisement
Advertisement

Loxia 35mm finally in Stock in USA!

[shoplink 33809 ebay]LOxia_35[/shoplink]

A few Loxia 35mm lenses are finally in Stock in USA at [shoplink 33809 ebay]FocusCamera (Click here)[/shoplink] and [shoplink 33811 ebay]Popflash (Click here)[/shoplink]. Also the Loxia 50mm lens is in Stock at [shoplink 33813 ebay]Popflash (Click here)[/shoplink]

Share this story
Community

Join the discussion

25 Responses

    1. Two possible reasons come to mind – weight while still getting a fairly fast lens, video where you need to smoothly pull focus – the Loxia will be much better for that. Warranty might be a third that could matter to a few – at least on DSLR lenses so I am hoping also on Loxia lenses, Zeiss gives us a 3 year extended warranty (in the USA) if you register the lens online while Sony is just one year. And then there’s the $200 difference 🙂

      1. Yeah, my Loxia came with three year warranty here in Sweden too, so I guess it’s a World wide thing for all “real” Zeiss lenses.

          1. Completely untrue. There is no such thing as a 6 year guarantee regulation in EU for electronic items. May I aks for your source? Otherwise please retain from confusing comments. Thank you.

          2. No need, you seem to think you know best and are arguing after the fact I told you you’re wrong; you continue to be wrong. Enjoy being screwed over by shops because you cannot be bothered to research properly

          3. Provide me with one single link that verifies there is a six years warranty effective in Sweden. Please do, mr knowitall. Meanwhile, if you even can read properly, here’s a link providing what Konsumentverket, an agency under the direction of the Swedish Government, has to say about it.

            http://www.konsumentverket.se/Other-languages/English/Consumer-rights/Guarantee/

            “Over and above the guarantee, the Consumer Purchases Act applies,
            according to which you have up to three years to complain about a fault
            which was already there when you first purchased the good.”

        1. because the FE will have the horrific variable focus throw and it’s focus-by-wire. FE lenses are literally the worst video lenses I’ve ever used. The 28-135FE may be the one exception. And I’m sure the Loxias will be lovely.

    1. Well worth the wait. I’ve had mine for just a few days now, and wow, it’s really a nice lens to use. Going to take some dinner and concert shots with it tomorrow with my A7S.

  1. I don’t think it will perform better than zm 35 f2 and the zm will be future proof as I can mount on any other mirrorless mount in case Sony ditched the FE mount. but if this wasn’t zeiss and was less than $800 price tag then it will be no brainer.
    PS. If money wasn’t an issue I would go with the 2010 Summilux 1.4 ASPH it is great investment :).

  2. Too bad that i am not a manual focus guy, otherwise this size and aperture are perfect for mirrorless body. Hope the f2 af version is available

    1. but all the others are far more expensive 😉

      Or do you prefer plastic fantastic loud AF crappy Canon glas? Then what are you doing here?

      1. I agree with you. But then again, I’m a bit wary of purchasing e-mount glass when i don’t think the e-mount will live very long.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search

Search
Advertisement
SNAPCLOUDBack up everyphotoTry freeSample ad

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

*Please also check your spam folder if you don't get the confirmation mail. And mark the mail as "non-spam" to see the future newsletter.

Advertisement
SNAPCLOUDBack up everyphotoTry freeSample ad
Advertisement
Advertisement