Digicameinfo reports that the 24-240mm FE lens will be announced next week on Wednesday March 4. This means preorders are expected to start the very same day. Shipment is expected to start on March 12 in Japan. It’s yet unclear if Sony will also release the pricing info (and accept preorders) on the other three new lenses. Although as I reported before Hong Kong store Shenzen is already accepting preorders on the new FE lenses:
[shoplink 33732 ebay]Zeiss FE 35mm f/1.4 for $1,729 (Click here to see it)[/shoplink].
[shoplink 33744 ebay]Sony FE 24-240mm lens for $1,099 (Click here to see it)[/shoplink].
[shoplink 33745 ebay]Sony FE 28mm f/2.0 lens for $459 (Click here to see it)[/shoplink].
[shoplink 33753 ebay]Sony 16mm Fisheye Converter for $319 (Click here to see it)[/shoplink].
–
To not miss any of them quickly subscribe our social network:
RSS feed: http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/feed/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/sonyalpharumors
Twitter: https://twitter.com/SonyAlphaRumors
GooglePlus: https://plus.google.com/104216500156717934391/posts
Reminder (SR = Sonyrumor):
SR1=probably fake rumor
SR2=rumor from unknown sources
SR3=50% chance it is correct
SR4=rumor from known sources
SR5=almost certainly correct!
140 Responses
.. and then it will be tested and photozone and get the usual 2 of 5 stars rating.
why is sony not making good lenses?
I don’t expect more from a superzoom, why should you?
And what do ratings have to do with good photographs?
What does guns have to do with war?
False analogy.
He didn’t mention “good photographs”
Straw man fallacy and possible red herring
You’re talking about captobvious’ statement, right?
Sony makes lenses? lol
Interresting range… Hopefully the quality is good enough also…
it seems quite sure that the resolution of such a kind of superzoom is maybe enough to deliver something like 8-10 MPix pictures. So it may be a good option for an a7s, but surely not for an a7r or a future higher MPix sensor.
That’s just my guess… but I think that it is at least a very reasonable guess… just compare what Sigma and Tamron produced the last decade or so…
But the strength of such a lens is not it’s power to out resolve 50MPix sensors… it’s made for a convenient holiday or every occasion where you don’t want to carry 2-3 lenses with you. Or when you simply can’t just switch lenses (because of dust or moisture)
most 28-300mm are producing 5MPix 🙂 except Canon’s L (12MPix)..
8-10MPix is more then a reasonable guess, but i’m still hoping for more like a 12MPix or more (on a7).. even 15-16MPix.. will see.
Well, we are very happy, is this the new kit lens for the A7000 ? ok waw, now we just have to wait for the A7000 !!!!
It’s FE so the wide end gets wasted if you use it this way. Most superzooms start at 28 so I guess its range makes it stand out slightly.
Wasn’t it announced like a lifetime ago?
It was like, actually, officially, not announced yet.
Perhaps until next Wednesday 😉
This is the official announcement with the specs, pricing, and the release date.
If only Sigma made the new 24mm art lens for Sony FE mount. That would be what I buy.
and 24mm tilt-shift (for free) !
no worries… in year or so Canon will explode mirrorless market and then Sigma will strat producing mirrorless lenses… mostly for Canon i guess.. will see.
yeah! Canon will build on the current success of the EOS m and take over the whole mirrorless market…
well, i didn’t say it… but it seems that you even know it 🙂
LMFAO
awesome lens… did you check the reviews yet ?
how many times of these lenses want to show and announce…. kinda boring lol…
Feels like having been announced 20 times before.
Yup, a very boring lens, we keep hearing about it, and it doesn’t get released, until finally now. But we’ll have to endure one last post on it 4 days later.
Those monstruous new FE lenses misfit so painfully the tiny E-bodies. It’s like a kick in the face, both from ergonomics view and esthetics.
I agree 50%, that is on the superzoom (who needs that anyway) and the monstruous macro lens.
But the 28/2 is the expected size… The 35/1.4 Distagon is on the large side but it is still tiny compared to the Zeiss Otus Distagons. If the IQ delivers then the size can be acceptable.
It’s a full frame macro. Unless it’s a 50mm (no thanks), it’s not exactly going to be small…
I agree; we need larger bodies to accommodate high quality and fast lenses!
So sony, A3000 style e-mount body in a A7rII/A9 quality (metal, weather sealed, FF, 5 axis IBIS) should be the next step IMO! Then I will switch from my current a850 completely to E mount and not just having that a7s as a “fun-toy”
You want a camera in a quality of another camera (A7rII/A9), which don’t even exist? Interesting.
BTW: If you get bored by your “fun-toy” I would be glad to take it. 😉
I meant, a quality that could be expected from a future a7rII/a9…
Actually, the 24-240 looks quite similar to the Four Thirds 14-150mm f/3.5-5.6 (Panasonic/Leica “Vario-Elmar”)
which I’m still using on my E-M1 because none of the four or five
existing Micro Four Thirds superzoom lenses is anywhere as good. If the Sony lens was similarly good, it would be one of my first lenses to buy should I buy into FE-Mount some day.
I’m sure a full frame 24-240 2.8 pancake would sell like hot cakes. Can’t imagine why Sony hasn’t made one…
Yes. I ordered a custom superzoom from Zeiss, a 20-400/2.8
But they will only start design if I win the lottery jackpot tonight. 🙂
So exciting, the next big and slow superzoom. I always have the impression no full-frame-customer wants this kind of lenses. Or, the other way around, no super-zoom-customer would be interested in full frame. But I must be wrong.
Sony is not stupid. They wouldn’t produce endless variations of slow zooms if they wouldn’t sell them.
So, the question is: who would buy this lens?
Well I can safely rule myself out. The 35/2.8 and 55/1.8 are my go to lenses for travel…
Certainly not me. I cant understand it either. Its more of a gadget lens and that doesnt belong to a FF system.
At least it should not be the first of those lenses to be released. I would focus on other lenses first.
I won’t buy one , but it’s great for travelers who doesn’t want to carry many lenses.
Yes.
And the wife could be reason, too – if she is permanently nagging because lens choosing and image composition takes too much time. 🙂
Oh.. sorry I did’t know this I’m single 😛
Yes, I know, there are many people with valid reasons for all-in-one-zooms. I just didn’t expect them to buy a full-frame camera.
Hmm.. seems there are mysteries which will never be solved.
The mystery is that Sony A7 is the cheapist FF ILC in the market.
when you compare prices of Fuji/Olympus cameras and Sony A7 , it’s very close.
But Sony will win easily because of the FF sensor.
Now many begginers buy A7 as their first step in photography.
It can be assumed that most SZ users are not doing professional work with it, although I have a friend who does (he is working with a D800 and the 28-300).
I think these lenses are used as travel-all-in-one solutions for most users who are actually buying it.
There is this general statement that 2-3x zoom is fair, 5x zoom requires compromises and 10x zoom or more is crap on FF.
That’s in fact to easy adjudging.
Of course superzooms are requiring many compromises as well as intensive post processing, but if you have mastery of composition and post processing a SZ might be a good choice if you are limited in budget.
And it depends on the use case of the images – if you don’t print or present larger than 7×5″ it is easy to live with the compromises.
Yes, 24-240 is pretty ambitious… Personally I’d rather they went for a high quality 24-120. Anxiously awaiting some IQ tests/reviews, and hoping it’s decent.
Many pro’s *do* use (less ambitious) zooms for their professional travel or photojournalism work. Ed Kashi for example uses the 24-120 as his work-horse.
Who would buy this lens? Canon 5D customers.
There’s a shitload of tourists that buy the Canon 5D because it is the biggest and the best (according to some people). Those same people will buy a superzoom to go with it. They are clueless about photography they just want to throw money at the problem. If Sony wants to target that tourist market they also need a superzoom.
Not just tourists. If you look at most photography awards on flickr, most top rated photos on 500px, etc etc, they were taken with a canon
Oh I don’t disagree with that. 5D targets many customer types, including plenty of professionals.
What I mean is the typical type of tourist that wants the biggest and the best and therefore picks a 5D and slaps on crappy lenses.
Oh I see what you mean, yeah I agree. Hopefully there’s lots of them to help lower the price of other items
Finally comes the travel lens, hope the price is approachable.
I was never very impressed with any of the three 18-200mm Zooms made for the APS-C cameras, well I guess 2 of them were the same under different names. I always found 6.3 on the long end to be too slow in most usage scenarios. I do hope that this design is significantly improved on those older lens designs. If not, I will be passing on it, even though it is a convenient focal range when you only want to carry one lens.
Hey Sony,
24-240 is too huge and I doubt anyone needs that much range.
We need a smaller 24-120 or 24-135 (but not the huge G version) that is decently priced.
I’ll just take a 24mm prime to be honest 🙂 I hate zooms.
Looks ok to me on the A7II. It’s big, but if you want this type of stretch than why complain?
What are your reasons for not complaining? How does it benefit you?
Well, your getting 24-240mm! That’s a serious range on a full frame camera. I’m saying, I think a lot of these lenses are too big, but this one makes sense to me. I can get fast small lenses with adapters for E mount. This guy is a different beast. I think the size is acceptable if they manage to not F it up and it’s good wide open.
I’d like to be surprised, but honestly I expect:
– Distortions above average
– Vignetting above average
– CAs above average
– Soft corners wide open, especially at the short and long end
– Palish colours
However, if one prefers the all-in-one and masters post processing it is worth a try. If big prints are not intended it would be ok – but if ones travel images are expected to become big posters at home, a prime should be first choice.
That much range might be useful at a zoo or for a complete amateur that doesn’t know what focal lengths they like. I would have preferred it if they put their energy into a smaller lens
Somewhere like Tibet, the mountains which are too far away from you that cant/dont want to approach, the tele really help A LOT imo.
Given how soft the Zeiss 24-70mm F4 is for the money, it’s possible this could match it. That would be hilarious and sad at the same time.
In my opinion, lenses like this are virtually useless most of the time with an exception, going to the zoo.
There are far sharper lenses with wider apertures, even more standard zoom lenses (like a 24-70, 70-200, 200-400) are typically sharper with wider apertures.
I use primes for everything (canon zooms are the only zooms I really fell in love with) and perhaps I am biased but the only time I will use this lens is perhaps once in a year so it’s simply not worth buying. I understand people will say get a high paying job (I have one) but it’s not a case of affordability (unless it was $100 then I’d buy it regardless), I just simply don’t see the use of a lens like this.
I think zooms in general are for people that don’t know what focal lengths they like, for that purpose they are incredibly useful. I can see that a wide angle zoom might be useful because for landscape work, you can shoot at f8 anyway. I would quite like to see a leica wate that works better on sony cameras! That would interest me.
A zoom like this tries to do too much and the image quality suffers because of it.
I realise there are exceptions to the rule, like the 70-200 canon lenses are better than a lot of the zeiss primes ( http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/ISO-12233-Sample-Crops.aspx?Lens=104&Camera=453&Sample=0&FLI=1&API=0&LensComp=481&CameraComp=453&SampleComp=0&FLIComp=0&APIComp=5 ) and perhaps this lens will surprise us. I doubt it
I think this zoom is meant more for travel, for:
A) Convenience / Speed – when you’re shooting a wide variety of subject matter and need a variety of focal lengths (wide, mid, tele) and time is essential (not enough time to always be fumbling with and swapping prime lenses)
B) Shooting In Inhospitable Environments – dusty, dirty, damp or whatever environment you’re and you don’t want to change lenses to better protect the sensor and lens element
Though… I guess you could use it at the zoo too 🙂
Nailed it.
The sensor has glass in front of it.
These cameras aren’t sealed properly, a zoom lens isn’t going to fix that.
I use a second camera if changing lenses takes too long.
I haven’t ever seen a professional photographer use a lens like this because they thought changing lenses took too long. I have seen others use a second camera with a 24-70. This doesn’t add any weight to my argument (it’s not meant to), but I don’t think using a lens like this helps much
They probably won’t allow this lens in hospitals.
You’re right. The lens is a major compromise and for people upgrading from an iPad.
What will be the real street price here? Come on- please not 1k.
When Nikon released the 28-300 it came with a msp of 999 €. The Canon 28-300 is for years around 2k€; and the recently released Tamron FF 28-300 came at a msp of 799 €.
So I assume the Sony coming for min 999 €, maybe 100 or 200 more.
will be €999 or €1099. i hope for €999 🙂 just looks better 1999 BGN instead of 2199BGN…
anyway… i hope it’s a good lens and i’ll buy it *with pleasure* 🙂
28mm for 459.00! Finally, a price I can stomach. Talk to me Sony….talk to me.
You shouldn’t buy a full frame camera if you expect lenses to be cheap
I have no problem paying 2k for the focal lengths I enjoy. 135? I’ll pay 3k if it has the goods. I have a very specific goal with the E mount system since I already have two others. Few small lenses- rangefinder style. If the 28 converters fare well on reviews- all an instant buy. It works for me.
I’m in a similar boat. I use medium format for most work. Sold my 5d3 since medium format is superior for professional jobs, and it was sufficiently big to be an annoying hobby camera.
For people in our position, I think
leica wate, canon tse 24, loxia 35, loxia 50 and a leica 90 is a hard combo to beat. Loxia 21 will be announced soon
>since medium format is superior for professional jobs<
Idiotic comment!
When taken out of context and a fallacious argument is made, yes. I was talking about the professional jobs I do, not professional jobs in general
It all depends on what you shoot.
I don’t think you can shoot sports with a medium format.
In a well controlled studio environment, you don’t need a medium format.
I don’t really know in what situation you need a medium format.
I was talking about the work I do, not professional jobs for people in general (simply, my professional jobs).
“I don’t think you can shoot sports with a medium format.”
This is false actually. The fast sync speed can be extremely useful too. You can get around it by using NDfilters but there’s limitations to this.
I’ve used medium format for skiers, and sprinters.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U6vWip-Mb0g
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vu-_Tzf7Q-E
To clarify, I’m not in these videos (although I do use a move) but these are similar to what I’m talking about
Zeiss 135mm Apo-Sonnar is the finest lens for the $ out there.
https://sonyvnikon.wordpress.com/2015/02/19/zeiss-apo-sonnar-135mm-imatest-on-sony-a7r-and-nikon-d810/
135mm 1.8 fairly close outside of wide open. No AF is a no go for me.
http://jorgetorralba.com/2014/08/11/zeiss-135mm-f1-8-za-vs-zeiss-135mm-f2-apo-sonnar/
AF is as never as accurate as MF. Every imatest I’ve ever done the MF scores with same ‘system’ exceeded the AF scores. But in many situations it’s a necessary evil. I’ll use AF and DOF to address what I can’t accomplish with MF and active subjects. Lastly, the CA on the ZA version is walk away bad for me. I wouldn’t tolerate it. The Rolex shots prove that point.
>I’ll use AF and DOF to address what I can’t accomplish with MF and active subjects<
You're no photographer. How do you earn coin?
CA is easily cleaned up. I see your point with MF. Depends on the application in terms of value.
Pity you aren’t any good at taking photos.
That’s the quality of Sony 11+7 bit color and astigmatism.
https://sonyvnikon.files.wordpress.com/2015/02/sony-200mm-f4_1.jpg
Nope, that’s a very poor photographer.
It’s Sony’s top of the line mirrorless camera with their 70-200 lens on AF and an ISO high enough to avoid shutter shock and motion blur. ALL of the blame is on Sony. Compare it to the Nikon. Huge differences in IQ.
(similar to the differences between you and I)
https://sonyvnikon.files.wordpress.com/2015/02/nikon-200mm-f4_1.jpg
Now post one where you have bothered to focus the Sony camera properly.
You are a joke.
You’re the joke Baz. Over 1000 people a day from over 55 countries will see your post above. Thanks Baz. And PS the Sony files speak for themselves. AF at 1/500th is hard to fake Sony mush. That’s authentic Sony mush while the Nikon was a 1/400th and more prone to motion blur.
https://sonyvnikon.files.wordpress.com/2015/02/baz.jpg
No, you didn’t focus properly. Stop blaming the camera for your pathetic abilities.
Really, he’s off with an quality EVF, think what he’s like with the OTUS and Nikon OVF.
Baz Sid = it’s AF @ 1/500th.
You’re done.
An out of focus image shot at 1/500 is still out of focus.
This is really basic stuff.
Even in a low contrast transition Sony has significant CA
https://sonyvnikon.files.wordpress.com/2015/02/sony-ca.jpg
Black and white is low contrast???!! Idiot.
The image is also out of focus, which will exacerbate any problems.
Idiot – that’s Sony color ! LMAO – you just made my point in mistaking a Sony color photo as black and white. Thank god you’re so stupid.
You just made my day Baz. Thank you!
https://sonyvnikon.files.wordpress.com/2015/02/baz.jpg
Like taking candy from children
What are you blathering on about? No I didn’t. I was talking about the CA between the black part and the white part – you know, the bit you called a “low contrast transition”.
It’s still out of focus and you’re still an idiot. The test is void.
Explain your tiny little mind. How does one ‘fake’ bad results under these conditions. That’s just the best Sony can manage moron.
How’s about posting some decent images from yer Nikon in order to better prove yer point?
>You just made my day Baz. Thank you!<
Ohohohohoho…………splat. You're pathetic sally!
I was a little alarmed when I saw this photo, because it doesn’t look anything like the rendering of the ZA 135mm.
There is no EXIF data, but lo and behold, the file is named “Sony-200mm-f/4_1.jpg”
Why would you bother doing this?
Sorry dude – and you’re totally right, this is not a Zeiss 135mm Apo photo. It’s a Sony with the 70-200.
To the best of my knowledge a Zeiss lens can take very good photos with a Sony DSLR as they don’t suffer from the same 11+7 bit compression.
The EXIF data is scrubbed in my C1 output. I can screenshot and redact for you though.
That’s the best you could manage out the A7R? Believe me when I say this, “go learn photography 101, it aint the camera, it’s you Sally.”
That’s the best the A7r can manage. It ain’t Nikon+Nikon territory and not even close to Nikon + Zeiss territory.
Yeah, I have to agree with the others, I can get WAY MORE out of my a7r with Zeiss.
Why not? Canon and Nikon have many excellent, cheap lenses. The marketing has gotten to you. There’s barely a difference between many EF lenses and their L counterparts at the same apertures.
Full frame lenses are larger, more difficult to design and more expensive than cameras with smaller sensors. The marketing hasn’t gotten to me. The “L” counterparts are vastly different, especially in colour and that’s ignoring the sharpness, cheap motors etc
You may be right that its more difficult to design full frame lenses, but that’s besides the point… which is that Canon and Nikon are able to deliver great lenses at reasonable prices, and Sony mostly refuses to. Full frame is not some premium, belonging-to-the-elite class of cameras; they are mainstream, especially with Sony’s products.
I’ve shot with L and non-L lenses professionally. Some L lenses are great, but many are barely different from their cheaper counterparts. Watch Digital Rev’s episode comparing the 35mm f/2 and the f/1.4 L variant. I’ve used these two myself, and there isn’t much between them. The 50mm f/1.8 for under $100 comes extremely close to the f/1.2 L version too. http://www.slrlounge.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Dress-f4-50mmf1.2-50mm1.8.jpg
However, I do think there should be a couple of lines of products, like Canon has. Larger aperture, premium build and superior coatings should adorn the premium (Zeiss) products, while offering a way in for new customers. Right now, Sony has cheap bodies, but no cheap, decent lenses like the competition. I’m pretty sure that’s stopping a lot of people from jumping in.
I’ve had and no longer use several 1.2 lenses. They’re just not that good. They offer little advantage in low light which ISO can address better. They offer little in DOF vs a 1.4 or even 2.0. Lensporn below was shot at 4.0.
The Otus 85mm 1.4 is superior in every way to the Contax 85mm 1.2. (lack of CA, resolution, resistance against flare) The older Zeiss just ends up collecting dust.
(looks like they both collect dust!)
https://sonyvnikon.files.wordpress.com/2015/02/85mm.jpg
Again no examples from you mr chart boy!
That’s Mr. Table boy to you.
How’d you like dem exAPPLES?
https://sonyvnikon.files.wordpress.com/2015/02/untitled.jpg
“You may be right that its more difficult to design full frame lenses, but that’s besides the point…”
It’s not when you read my argument and comprehend it.
” which is that Canon and Nikon are able to deliver great lenses at reasonable prices, and Sony mostly refuses to.”
They’re all expensive and priced according to focus speed, lens quality, image quality, image size, how many lenses get sold etc.
“Watch Digital Rev’s episode”
Lol. I think the fact you’re using a low quality youtube video with an even lesser quality photographer to judge lenses says it all.
“The 50mm f/1.8 for under $100 comes extremely close to the f/1.2 L version too.”
I’ve owned both, it doesn’t come remotely close and the colours are dramatically different. The build quality is completely different too. The aperture is also different.
http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/ISO-12233-Sample-Crops.aspx?Lens=121&Camera=453&Sample=0&FLI=0&API=2&LensComp=122&CameraComp=453&SampleComp=0&FLIComp=0&APIComp=0
Tests like this only show sharpness and not colour rendition, the build quality of the lens, the image quality, the focusing speed, the focusing noise, the sealing of the lens, the servos used, etc.
Your argument is weak, you don’t know what you are talking about and your statements are fictitious
You’re right, the camera companies are god and they know best. And it can’t be that two people on the internet have differing opinions, anyone that doesn’t agree with you is an idiot, right? LOL, wow.
You might claim the moon is flat, you might state that’s a “different opinion” but the reality is that it’s fictitious information. Separate the subjective from the objective and you might look like less of an idiot
A7 series is a great camera for enthusiasts and amateurs.
Most of us are not professionals and are price conscious but want full frame bodies with mediocre lenses.
With an laea adapter there are hordes of quality full frame AF lenses that can had for very little.
It’s a sure thing that no compromises in resolution and CA were made in this Swiss Army knife of a 10x ratio lens. Hell, it’s even doubtful that the average Sony mirrorless user will even notice. With a 20% reduction in resolution and 75% less color information the average ‘Joe Sony’ won’t even notice when he shows off all of his ‘photography’ on a color choked sRGB 8″ tablet.
Don’t waste another dime on Sony MUSH. Get the facts.
https://sonyvnikon.wordpress.com/
It’s a sure thing that no compromises in resolution and CA were made
in this Swiss Army knife of a 10x ratio lens. It’s even doubtful
that the average Sony mirrorless user will even notice. With a 20%
reduction in resolution and 75% less color information the average ‘Joe
Sony’ won’t even notice when he shows off all of his ‘photography’ on a
color choked sRGB 8″ tablet.
Don’t waste another dime on Sony MUSH. Get the facts.
https://sonyvnikon.wordpress.com
Bellend
IS SOMETHING WRONG WITH YOU? YOU REALLY NEED SOME HELP.
An Anton a day keeps the Sony away.
How people have said to you, “hey, thanks Anton for posting the same thing on SAR everyday, I really appreciate your work”?
How many people have asked you to stop spamming SAR
How many Sony mirrorless users have expressed regret in trusting Sony’s 14 bit promise when they only get 25% of the color information they paid for?
I will keep up the campaign until Sony fixes the lie.
Dunno, less than 10%. The reality is that most people don’t care in everyday scenarios.
Clearly you have OCD, so you’re going to continue to annoy everybody.
Care doesn’t come into an objective discussion about digital data, sorry. Defending Sony’s unethical behaviour purely to attack him, furthered by ableism is disgusting. By all means invoke argumentum ad populum to discredit further verbal diarrhoea that comes out of your paws
Pretentious, much?
At least he doesn’t insert foot in mouth and make someone else’s point so completely and entirely in mistaking a crop of a Sony image with obvious CA as OOF and as black and white.
Baz you’re the perfect example of the idiot assumed and with one more most, the idiot undeniable.
https://sonyvnikon.files.wordpress.com/2015/02/baz.jpg
No, I’m arrogant; don’t confuse that with being pretentious. I’m the opposite of pretentious. I dumb down my speech in order to communicate with algae such as yourself
LOL.
Bob and Baz, you’re both the same.
What are you talking about? He’s the only one who makes any sense in this forum! Oh, and that Barry guy too.
You still haven’t answered my question. What do you get out of all of this? What’s motivating you to spend so much time on a brand I’m assuming you want nothing to do with?
Originally I wanted to see Sony fix the compression issue but now my hopes are that a class action attorney will take notice and sue Sony for the fraud. I just dislike dishonest corporations.
I also enjoy beating down on morons like Baz that really make fools of themselves.
If yahoo still had trolling forums I’d be over there with Cindybin and Edna Bambrick.
Anton you’re just a pathetic troll nothing more, this constant and repetitive false talking point only highlights your stupidity and jealousy. You need professional help for this mental condition that drives you to repeatedly make a fool of yourself. What exactly is your problem? Low self esteem, autism, senility, loneliness? Were you bullied as a child? Is your penis too small, what is it.
You’re the one using his name. You’ve stated he has a mental condition but you later state you don’t know what it is. Perhaps you should consider seeing a shrink? It is just a thought
Wow look what Anton put up now ! My Sony mirrorless is really pathetic.
https://sonyvnikon.files.wordpress.com/2015/02/rawdigger.jpg
https://sonyvnikon.files.wordpress.com/2015/02/untitled.jpg
Anton, many on here would love to see your body of work – particularely if you can illustrate what you do that cannot be achieved on Sony cameras.
KLDSLR.com (Malaysia) claims to have this lens available in-stock now for RM 3,299.00 (or US $924)
http://kldslr.com/sony-fe-24-240mm-f3.5-6.3-oss-sony-malaysia-3299.00.html-1