Well there is one more great thing with the Sony A7s. With the super high ISO performance it delivers we can finally spot the UFO’s flying around at night! Check out that video: youtube.com/watch?v=Iaksh6P8AMU. It has been shot by CityHunter who writes:
My friend Terrence shot this footage testing his brand new Sony A7S, with a [shoplink 33299 ebay]50mm Nikon lens[/shoplink]. Shot at 70,000 ISO, it made 9:30pm look like twilight. First is the normal speed, then a slowed version of the footage.
More UFO videos here: Youtube one and Youtube two.
Personal note: I have a scientific mindset and I have an extremely hard time to believe in UFO’s. Usually those things can be easily explained with a bit of research and rational thinking. But I am seriously impressed by the terrific A7s performance. I “Believe” in the A7s 🙂
Sony A7s store links:
Sony A7s in USA/CA at Amazon, Adorama, BHphoto, Sony USA, Sony Canada.
Sony A7s in Eu at Sony DE, UK, ES, FR, IT, NL, BE, AT, CH, SE, NO, FI, PL. And Wex UK.
A7s Gariz leather case in [shoplink 27569 ebay]Black (Click here)[/shoplink], [shoplink 27570 ebay]Brown (Click here)[/shoplink], [shoplink 27571 ebay]Red (Click here)[/shoplink] and [shoplink 27572 ebay]Orange (Click here)[/shoplink].
53 Responses
the sensor need to be clean.
oh, that must be very special glowing dust!
Reflections in the uv filter
There’s nothing irrational or unscientific about the possibility of extraterrestrial, sentient, spacefaring life with more advanced technology than our own.
Those are geese flying over the city and reflecting the light with their light colored underbellys. A7s really pics up the reflections well.
Sony users not only shoot cats, brick walls and statues!!! we also shoot UFO in high ISO. Beat that Canikons LOL! Sony is the pro!
those UFOs are raw compression artifacts, Canon does not have them
Admin, UFOs are real – simply unidentified / unknown objects in the sky. I think you mean that you do not think alien or extra-terrestrial beings / spaceships exist.
Exactly.
They could be birds
It was Canon, Nikon and µ43 flying at level unreachable for Sony.
These most definitely DO appear to be UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECTS.
The do not however appear to be alien spacecraft.
Not believing in the possibility of alien life is the same as not believing in your own existence.
I am 99% sure there a lot of life in the universe. I do just not believe those are alien flying like drunk people over our cities 🙂
RIP logic!
Starting to think you don’t believe in rumors either.
A long time ago, in a galaxy far away, somewhere over the rainbow, where no man has gone before, click your heels twice and say ET go home.
Twas beauty that killed the beast, so live long and prosper, don’t try do, may the force be with you, the sun will come up tomorrow, and always let the wookie win.
Dead pixels!!!!!
It’s the Nikon lense! Not the Sony body!
may,that is new organic sensor from panny/fuji,lock on target
“I don’t believe in UFOS” Why not? unidentified flying objects are just that… It can be anything and not necessarily aliens
You are right. I have to specify. I don’t believe in those guys that are sure the UFO’s are aliens flying around our world.
You are so smart.
yeahhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!
After losing the MP war, we are back to the hi iso Sony trend 🙂
Which 135 camera can a consumer shoot with today that has a higher resolution than an a7r or Nikon d810 (with Sony sensor)?
There are no UFO’s .. Only Viruses exsist
It’s just birds…..Case closed.
Bioluminescent birds? Cool!
Seriously, you should learn more about UFO’s before claiming “i don’t beleive in UFO’s”. Read at least “Le rapport Cometa” (Cometa report) and the Leslie Kean Book “UFOs: Generals, Pilots, and Government Officials Go on the Record “!
UFO’s exist, this is not a question…There are a few Official agencies in the world to study them (Peru, France…)… Even after a complete investigations, a few (about 20%) of the reported “suposed UFOs cases” remain without explanations. Among those 20%, 1/4 (about 5% of total) are realy questionning cases (not just some strange far lights in the sky, but realy FLYING OBJECTS, piloted, observed by at least 2 différents sources: 2 humans or human+radar…), showing flying performance far far far better than any known plane or human machine in the world. The right question is “What are they?” and “are they extraterrestirals or not?”… here everyone can believe or not… but if you are a little bit currious, get informed about this complex subject before fixing your opinion!
Yes yes but do they have the a-mount road map?
It is very misleading, that the term “circumstantial evidence” contains the word “evidence”, because circumstantial evidences are just indications, nothing more, and have absolutely nothing to do with evidences.
The best you can say is, they may exist.
I don’t know if they exist, and honestly I give a f***, but I am absolutely positively clear that the pilots (if there any) have green skin color and little antennas.
Seriously, you should learn more about physics and the fallibility of human perception and senses before claiming someone should “learn more about UFO’s”. Ufo’s aren’t a real ‘thing’ in of themselves they are at best physical objects or phenomena that aren’t outputting enough measurable information to give their real identities away and at worst, figments of someone’s imagination. Everything solid and demonstrable that we know about the physical universe says that the kind of interstellar travel required for an alien being to reach Earth is, as near as damn it impossible. The kind of evidence required to oppose such a near impossibility would have to be among the best evidence ever proffered for any hypothesis….ever.
Offering up the fact that military and government personnel are also susceptible to delusions of this nature is a comparative drop in the ocean compared to the God concepts that these same types of people have being suckered into accepting as reality.
@Admin
Now we know what you are doing instead of hunting rumors. 😛
Would explain a lot of the inconsistence here on SAR.
No more false excuses. 😉
Inconsistence ??? Please elaborate.
To be honest, I think we’re now more likely to be visited by the Mothership than see a pro-level A7000, or any further development of the APS-C E-Mount lens line.
Agreed the cost would be so close to the a7ii. So why not just go full frame.
Because the lenses are very significantly bigger and heavier, as are the bodies (especially if the A7ii is any indication).
If you look at the size of the upcoming primes (e.g., 35 1.4) I personally see little advantage over a FF DSLR which has better overall performance (especially AF, and low-light AF). Compare that lens to the size of the 35 1.8 E-Mount, or a competitor APS-C like Fuji’s 35 1.4 and you’ll see what I mean.
I believe APS-C is the future, as sensors get better and cleaner, and people increasingly demand smaller, lighter gear, and I think Sony would regret a decision not to develop the format further down the line. All IMO, of course.
The size of an A7II is still miles away from a bulky 5d3 or D810. The lenses itself may be about the same when fast (35/1.4), but the package with an A7 is still way smaller and lighter, and because you have a choice, you can go very compact if you wish with a 35/2.8 for instance or the manual lenses from Zeiss (35/2).
Also you gain an EVF over DSLRs which dont have all those features like peaking and magnified view in the finder. This is the main reason for me.
dust on sensor?
It’s simple, it’s the new Sony publicity announcement of te speed that the new A7000 UFO will have, so is there’s more to follow about the A7000 UFO? I hope so, Sony better hurry, or I go to another UFO camera?
U will never see UFO-s again after watching this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2dllo85ZSUk
Lets hope that Sony will not try to add nightvision tech to the A7s sensor 🙂
Definitely birds shot under sunset light ( high altitude ) with a high sensitivity camera… Even a UFO would not have such dexterity in grouped flight
Not at all there are 0 gravity skateboarders from 2015 alternative future…. We see some YouTube video of their performance yet.
42
Its mythical nex7 succesor with Pegasus and Sleipnir.
dont be ashamed, when theres nothing left to say its time to step into the comedy territory
You mean dead pixels.
You mean fully alive, ADHD pixels. (or else they would be black…no?)
I want to believe!
UFO is not a matter of belief, it’s just an unidentified flying object.
Sony can’t capture 14 bit color but can capture UFOs ? Laughable.
Sony’s raw compression is still inexcusable
Deep shadow tonality test – anything below about level 40 is rather
‘fragile’; the signal isn’t that clean and care must be taken if any
significant tonal manipulations are to be undertaken.
No matter how much technology is packed into the rest of the camera, if
the sensor does not deliver – then we might as well go home. I am still not
happy with the crippling 11+7 bit raw compression: you can still run into
posterization fairly easily in highlights and shadows, especially if adjusting
color balance under mixed lighting. Watch carefully for clipping, too – it
doesn’t roll off nicely in the highlights like the D810. ISO for ISO, lens for
lens, the D750 delivers a better quality file – with about 1-1.5 additional
stops of usable (i.e. clean, manipulable in postprocessing without artifacts)
dynamic range – in addition to slightly more transparent color, and
surprisingly, about a stop less noise.
I have been challenged repeatedly on the file compression/ banding/
usable DR issue. Yes, everything looks good at web sizes, but then again you’re
also oversampling by a factor of 20 or so, so deficiencies get averaged out.
Here’s a 100% crop of an affected file (‘Skyline reflection’, from above) –
this is an ideal exposure scenario; base ISO on a tripod and sufficient light.
And there’s pretty clear purple/magenta banding/posterization in the sky, up to
RGB luminance level 50+, which is visible in print and almost impossible to
post process out. The D810 under similar conditions does not show this, and the
D750’s response is identical. Neither file has noise reduction or exposure
adjustment applied in ACR. It is NOT necessarily an issue for all types of
photography, but as they say – you pay your money and take your chances.
The aliens have arrived to probe the Sony management team! That’s right team, bend over and take it like a MANager!!