Advertisement
SNAPCLOUDBack up every photoUnlimited RAW storage, 30 days freeTry freeSample ad
Advertisement
Advertisement

New Sony A7sII test by Philip Bloom.


“After Darkness, light” Testing the low light of the Sony A7S II
from Philip Bloom Reviews & Tutorials on Vimeo.

Philip Bloom (Click here) posted his initial impressions of the Sony A7S II. Check it out!

More A7sII tests:
Sony A7SII Profile Test: https://vimeo.com/143344079
Sony A7s mark II vs the A7s Frontallobbings.
Sneak Peek: A Pro’s Take on the New Sony Alpha7S II (Vimeo).
The Sony a7S II – hands on and comparison to a7R II (Hireacamera).

Sony A7sII is now shipping in USA at Amazon, BHphoto, FocusCamera, Adorama. And in Europe/Asia at ParkCameras, WexUK, Jessops and Digitalrev.

Share this story
Community

Join the discussion

20 Responses

      1. ,,Slog2 puts mid grey at 32%IRE and 90% white at 59%IRE
        Slog3 puts mid grey at 41%IRE and 90% white at 61%IRE”
        ,,There is no difference in the highlight range of S-Log2 and S-log3. It is exactly the same with both curves”
        found:
        https://community.sony.com/t5/FS7/FS7-Scene-Files-and-SLog2-vs-SLog3/td-p/486446

        The noise in the video Slog3 in mid grey tones is felt more then 9% difference. I think it needs closer test of this. I read an other commend that means the SNR Signal is the generally the same. But the example pictures to this are not shooting in the highest ISO, to better sight complain.

        1. The Person you quote later in his post says that there are “slight distribution changes”. Well I guess that is rather an understatement. Judging a slog curve by 2 or 3 reference points might come in handy but does not tell the whole story. Several other sites describe the output to have “a good highlight rolloff” or “The extra lattitude Slog3 provides can be seen in the highlights”

          See the attached image. I have not been able to find the curves however.

          1. Looking at the real word pics I see the middle skyscraper to be visibly brighter in slog3 and looking at the graphs around -2ev to 2ev there is a significant distance between both graphs. I have no raw data but 9% difference in the midtones sounds correct.

          2. What is yer clarification for the more noise in the mid tones in Slog3- It’s it only based on the +9% brighter mid tones or has Sony an other (poorer) SNR Reduction in this mode?

          3. I am really no expert in this field and cannot calculate which combination of brightness ie. height of the graph and contrast ie. angle of the graph yields the best SNR ratio. This does not even take into account the many types of noise. The video you posted should have a lot of photon shot noise. Increasing brightness on this kind of noise may exaggerate it’s visibility stronger than applying more contrast. Since even the brightest parts of the resulting video would have to be described as a low key histogram, contrast can even lower the visibility of noise as it crushes it into the blacks. All I want to say is that slog2 is not better than slog3 or vice versa. Both have their place and both help to have a workaround for Sony’s choice to keep video on only 4:2:2 output.

          4. Thanks for your statement.

            I find important to mention the Slog3 perhaps in high ISO generated more Noise in mid-tones, as if one raises a Slog2 video in the Mid tones up + 9%. It requires a deeper test to more exactly ascertain this phenomenon.

      1. With the a7s or a7sII?
        I found not one same report about this in the internet. But the a7sii is new. It’s not available in Germany or probably in Europe. I find importantly to mention this, so that it is observed and is hopefully also announced whether it is an isolated case or a general problem.

      1. After what on the web page stands the app will be still extended. One can be of use SLog from ISO 100 and use DR values probably together with the Picture profiles. It is probably an app like the
        PlayMemories Camera Apps

  1. Another video from Philip”nothing-ever-in-focus-24-7-365″ Bloom. And he doesn’t disappoint. Lots of headache inducing almost-in-focus shots. Meh!! With the amazing high ISO performance of the α7s2 there is no reason to shoot wide-open anymore.

    Oaxaca is spelled Oaxaca, but it is pronounced Wahaka, Please see 2:30 in the video for the street Mexican food stand named Wahaka, This is one of the few scenes in the video to have enough DOF to read the sign.

    1. ‎‎

      .…my roomate’s sister is making $97 working on a PC onIine……..A few days ago new McLaren F1 subsequent after earning 18,512$,,,this was my previous month’s paycheck ,and-a little over, $17k Last month ..3-5 h/r of work a day ..with extra open doors & weekly paychecks.. it’s realy the easiest work I have ever Do.. I Joined This 7 months ago and now making over $83, p/h..Learn More right Here….
      rs…….
      ➤➤
      ➤➤➤ http://GlobalEmploymentReportsTopStarJobsPoint/Get/$97hourly… ❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search

Search
Advertisement
SNAPCLOUDBack up everyphotoTry freeSample ad

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

*Please also check your spam folder if you don't get the confirmation mail. And mark the mail as "non-spam" to see the future newsletter.

Advertisement
SNAPCLOUDBack up everyphotoTry freeSample ad
Advertisement
Advertisement