Sergey Kuznetsov
Kitezh-grad
Shot at Izmailovsky Kremlin, Moscow. Sony A7 + 2470/4
1) Submit your picture with a message and picture here: facebook.com/sonyalpharumors.
2) Like and comment the pictures from other readers here: https://www.facebook.com/sonyalpharumors/photos_stream?tab=photos.
3) A selection of most liked pictures by the community and by me SAR admin will be posted weekly on SAR.
Pavel ‘Pasharome’ Vavilin
“Noname”
ILCE-6000
Auto Rokkor-Pf 50/1.4
Floyd Dean
Hot Springs Virginia. Water Fall, Sony A7S long exposure king. This camera loves the dark.
Andre Salata
Bruno is coming!
Sony a6000 + Zeiss Touit 32mm f/1.8
@ 1/60sec f/2.8
Alan Ya Luan Ho
Taken at The Sanctuary of The Truth in Thailand
Sony A7R with 24-70mm A Mount Zeiss
Bernie Aniciete
Sony a7 50mm f/2.0 1/125 ISO800
www.Facebook.com/BnEMediA
www.BnEPhotography.com
Idealuz Photography
Karma
Sony NEX-5T, Sigma 60mm f/2.8 ART
@ f/2.8, 1/500 sec, 100 ISO
Location: Fontainebleau, Paris Area, France
Taken at sunrise
http://ilovehatephoto.com/
0 Responses
I’m down with this sickness.
the vaccine is on its way
I would not pass any of my hard earned dollars for any of the photographs submitted. However, will others do so? The only real opinion that counts is the one with the dollar sign before it and transferred to the photographers account.
I would also not pay for.
But you are missing that most probably the majority of guys submitting their photo here are either just hobbyists or they are not submitting an image they could be paid for.
For my personal taste Floyd would be the winner, followed by Sergey.
Kuznetsov is a pro.
I know that he is a pro. And I mentioned “majority” which does not say “all”.
You just gave your opinion for free; or is it not a real opinion?
Vlad, I commend you on calling me out on my wrongful composition of prose. I appreciate it as much as all the negative comments I might get for other things I say I do. I learn as such… and from you being forthright and honest, I have learned. TY.
That being said, it was a “free” opinion, but as you well know, a lack of a monetary value does not add to or take away from the “opinion”. I should have clearly stated that “opinion” of the photograph is for free, and quite easy, while a person’s opinion is deemed valuable when a monetary instrument is exchanged for a captured and processed photographic expression.
Is that a better way to express in words what I might have been trying to say?
Vlad has rather poor English, you must excuse him.
Nothing negative was meant, I was merely wondering, so I asked a question. It is clearer, though I would disagree with connecting the value of an opinion with a monetary exchange.
Well, I’ve posted a few keepers’ that I’m rather proud of and it crossed my mind that some may copy or otherwise use them. Even so, I am a hobby shooter and if I’m the only one that views my work then it seems pointless. Also, this website is so unstable that someone would have to work hard to do much of anything with files posted here anyway.
Best one this week (in my opinion) : Serguey Kuznetsov. I like the fact that, obviously, he has prepared everything and waited the exact moment with the exact light he wanted.
Agreed, gorgeous photo.
Perfect moment, yes. Well composed, yes.
Apparently it is not one single photo. I assume he stitched a couple of images.
But perfectly done.
A very nice picture, congratulations Sergey Kuznetsov!
some of the photo’s aren’t showing up, namely Sergey, Andre, and Bernie’s photo’s, and the last one. What are they of? Can someone provide the Described Photo version?
How was Sergey’s photo constructed? Was the panorama done by moving the camera physically across a line and taking a picture each time? if so taking a picture each time the camera is moved how are the stars and environment lit well. For example he would have to take a picture each time with long exposure to get stars in. By the time one picture is taken the sun will be going down?
Tips and settings?
I think this is an amazing picture. Best I’ve seen in a while. Well done. Very well done.
‘How was Sergey’s photo constructed? Was the panorama done by moving the
camera physically across a line and taking a picture each time?’
one shot or several shots taken with a panoramic tripod head that have been merged afterwards. you cant really tell without knowing how big the original file/picture is and what exact focal length he used…
‘For example he would have to take a picture each time with long exposure
to get stars in. By the time one picture is taken the sun will be going
down?’
exposure bracketing and photoshop. you just have to know how to use the tools…
Pure Photoshop. It’s a composite of images taken at different times with different exposures, probably not even from the same scene. There’s simply no other way of getting a wide field astro shot combined with sunlit buildings. It’s a nice picture and well done but completely artificial.