Video on top by Stephen Nguyen: “Here is a video I shot with the GH4 for a car expo teaser. The GH4 was mounted on a Varavon Birdycam 3-Axis Gimbal. I think by showing people that this camera can be used on professional shoots like this it will therefore encourage people to take the GH4 more seriously when it comes to cinematic or commercial applications.”
Second “Mirrorless Game of Thrones” episode where we compare the Olympus OM-D E-M1 and the Panasonic GH4 (Bestmirrorlesscamerareviews).
Amedeo: “I’d like to share a video that I shot recently during a short trip to Normandy with the GH3: https://vimeo.com/103959044”
Jonas: “A few hand-held shots with the OM-D E-M1: http://youtu.be/JqjBINx3VLk”
Josh: “I would like to introduce you to my Kickstarter campaign: the Heirloom, the “world’s first tomato for cameras”: http://kck.st/1piBPZO. There are *only 9 days left* in the campaign, and I have some very dedicated backers that really want to see it get funded. We need your help to get the word out. I have a brand new $20 model that may attract a lot of attention.
The Heirloom is a camera tripod alternative that looks like a tomato. 4/3 cameras will work very well with it. Mount your camera to the stem and off you go. It’s spherical (made out of a single piece of Cordura), so it’s versatile – tilted or level – on many kinds of surfaces that are not suited for tripods. There’s nothing else quite like it. The Heirloom didn’t start its life as a vegetable when I started working on it over two years ago, but in a strange way its features sort of required it to be a tomato.
I’ve gotten a few great mentions already, right alongside other top projects such as the Coolest and Cabin:
– “You’ll be able to take some amazingly sharp photos with your iPhone.” tuaw.com
– The Top Kickstarter Campaigns This Week eHow
– Press Release http://www.prweb.com/releases/2014/08/prweb12086606.htm
– Photos http://joshberry.com/heirloom/”
Alexander: “I’m Alexander Svet – professional photographer and Phase One Certified Professional. I and my team have created Film Styles Set for Capture One. This is a set of 100 color and b&w styles for Capture One.
We had worked on this styles more than two years, it was “long run”, but we have very good reviews from our customers. You can find all the details and sample images at http://captureonestyles.com“
8 Responses
Game of Thones post is so full of bias. He says the E-M1 has a problem in low light long exposures that the GH4 doesn’t have, yet he says choose the E-M1??
Pure bias, because he owns a E-M1.
And this is why M43 will fail. Dissection between Olympus Fan boys hating or disliking anything Panasonic, except for a few lumix lenses.
Why have a system with a partnership, that doesn’t trickle down to the users that chooses sides, because one side made cameras for decades, while the other is known for TVs and commercial products? -Even though I don’t look at it that way… initially, I brought and supported both sides, until I noticed the Olympus bias.
Now FUJI is my primary camera system and I can be no happier. But I won’t turn a blind eye to the unnecessary hate towards Panasonic.
Sure hope Panasonic unveils a APS-C camera at Photokina.
Wrong Sir. He owns also a GH4 for his video shooting. So no bias.
Panasonic doesn’t need an apsc. Differences between m43 and apsc are mostly negligible.
Oh, sorry, I forgot you fuji fanboys have the xtrans and the xtrans overperforms even ff sensors…
Just because he owns one, doesn’t mean there no bias. And, like you said, he has it for video shooting, when it’s just as capable a stills camera.
And no need for exaggerating, it makes you look uneducated. Let me know when M43 is just as good as the XTrans sensor in low light, or at ISO 3200.
I didn’t exaggerate at all. It is u fuji fan boys to be biased in a ridiculous way.
M43 sensor can be noisier than xtrans, but certainly retains more detail than the mushy xtrans at hi iso.
And I say this as an owner of both systems
The issue with low light long exposures does not matter if you don’t photograph that way. That would not be a consideration for me and many others.
I think you didn’t understand the result of the article. The result is, that both cameras have some advantages and it depends on your preferences which one is better for you. The writer chosed the E-M 1. This has nothing to do with bias.
I also have the impression, that you are not able to see the advantage of competition within the M43-System.
If someone starts to build up his camera-equipment he usually has to decide with which company he goes. Buying a Nikon, Canon, Leica, Hasselblad, fuji or sony means you are bound to this company unless you buy everything for a second system again.
M43 is the only system where you can change between several companys. M43 is also a system with a wide range of concepts, sizes and weights of the camera bodys. In addition, M43 is a system where you can use a uge number of lenses from other systems.
Competition makes M43 stronger.
A tomato for a camera: designed for and made by people with tomatoes for brains.
A tripod that looks like a tomato? Is this the Onion?