[shoplink 24905 ebay]
[/shoplink]
LEICA APO-MACRO-ELMARIT-R 100 mm f/2.8 ([shoplink 24905 ebay]lens here on eBay[/shoplink])
Joseph Lei sent me these images (Source: Pbase) of his Sony A7r and thrid party lenses. Quite some awesome lenses he owns! And the combination between the Sony camera and these fast lenses looks sexy too 🙂
Thanks Joseph for sharing these!
[shoplink 24906 ebay]
[/shoplink]
Contax Zeiss Distagon 35mm f/1.4 ([shoplink 24906 ebay]lens here on eBay[/shoplink])
[shoplink 24907 ebay]
[/shoplink]
Contax Zeiss Planar 85mm f/1.4 ([shoplink 24907 ebay]lens here on eBay[/shoplink])
[shoplink 24908 ebay]
[/shoplink]
Canon 85mm f/1.2 II ([shoplink 24908 ebay]lens here on eBay[/shoplink])
[shoplink 24909 ebay]
[/shoplink]
Canon 35mm f/1.4 ([shoplink 24909 ebay]lens here on eBay[/shoplink])
[shoplink 24910 ebay]
[/shoplink]
Contax Zeiss 50mm f/1.4 ([shoplink 24910 ebay]lens here on eBay[/shoplink])
[shoplink 24912 ebay]
[/shoplink]
Contax Zeiss Distagon 25mm f/2.8 ([shoplink 24912 ebay]lens here on eBay[/shoplink])
[shoplink 24913 ebay]
[/shoplink]
Canon 17-40mm f/4 ([shoplink 24913 ebay]lens here on eBay[/shoplink])
[shoplink 24914 ebay]
[/shoplink]
Canon 24-105mm f/4 ([shoplink 24914 ebay]lens here on eBay[/shoplink])
0 Responses
All I can think about now is dirty, filthy hot lens sex.
Uh, no.
Nice lens collection. I hope they’ve been used to take some nice pics.
so many taut, erect lenses. sexy indeed.
You can see some of my Sony A7 photos with various vintage lenses and the result of using each lens here if you’re interested
http://james.sl/blog/sony-a7-4-months-in/
You’re kidding me? ;^)
No he’s not kidding, he just loves looking at this crippled Leica killer.
Actually, Leica cameras are way more crippled comparatively speaking.
He meant crippled-Leica…
All that gets better if you are closer:) Does anyone know is there a possibility to setup a bigger viewfinder for situations where there is very little light. I was happy to note that most of my Leica lenses did well inside when there was little light and the AUTOISO function was good. However, once you are out with a Apo-Macro and want to shoot some mins you might appreciate some more light on your screen, especially when you are shooting video. The 5x focusing possibility would be of great help with this system. I have seen a video clip when this kind of system was in use, shot by a seashore, but as usual there were no product data. So if anyone knows how to make the focusing easier for those who have age vision and do not fall off the cliff with the gears…please, be kind and recommend a suitable system which would be robust and easy to operate in the dark as well. It is in the dark this sensor does wonderful work with the SEX and lenses of great sexappeal and apetit…so why not do it in the closer mode when it truly counts.
So, feel free to suggest all possible and impossible sotutions for this dilemma…it is worth it…
Thanx everyone in advance! hope to post some incredible results with these and even more sexier lenses…Take care! Cheers
I know there are such things as viewfinder magnifiers which may work, it just acts a bit like a magnifying glass and makes it bigger. but I have had trouble finding one for NEX/A7
Yes there are- I have seen one on you tube presentation where they shoot sea with long exposure…but no product names…you will find it from the Sony utubes…or I will lol..
What comes to Contax -I have lots of lenses which will fit on A7R with Novaflex adapter- but have not had change to use them yet. Adapters are passive of course. Lenses are for AX model not for N which had different mount. So watch if you start ordering… I am interested to learn if there is active Metabone adapter which could bring out more features…maybe somebody knows..? Cheers
I’ve got all of the contax he’s got plus a full set of Nikons, Minoltas and Russian lenses.
Maybe I should send an email to Andrea.
How can you connect a contax lens to to a metabones cannon EF mount? This just has to be for looks? Not workable?
contax to EF, then EF to E-mount 🙂
Thanks, just couldn’t see the adapter, fotodiox adapter then metabones? I will try this. C’est tout! Have a good one!
yep, if you look closely you can somewhat make out what looks like a Photodiox adapter (the thin ribbed bit)
http://www.amazon.com/Fotodiox-Adapter-Contax-Yashica-Digital/dp/B001G4SHT0
It makes sense for him because he also has many Canon EF lenses, but i’m sure there would be other ones which go straight from Contax to E-mount if you just have that one lens
yea, I go directly contax to metabones E mount. The cannon metabones mount would be an auto? A good money saving solution for cannon contax and leica lenses to E mount with auto feature?
Autofocus? is there autofocus in the contax lenses?
I know there is a different contax G to E-mount autofocus adapter too
http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/full-frame-contax-g-to-e-mount-electornic-adapter-to-be-launched-the-first-week-of-december/
Metabones has a cannon AF E mount.
http://www.metabones.com/products/?c=e-mount
Yes… Contax has AF lenses in both 35mm and 645. People have gotten the AF of 35mm contax lenses to work on Canons but not the 645 models, afaik.
I think you meant to write ‘silly images of the A7r and third party lenses’
I believe he realized it after pushing publish 🙂
had anyoneA7 with nikkor 18-35mm/3.5-4.5? i really curious about that combo
had anyone try A7 with nikkor 18-35mm/3.5-4.5? i really curious about that combo
Canon lenses are NOT “3rd party lenses” by that title I was expecting to see something from Sigma or Tamron WITHOUT having to use any adapters
What do you call lenses that are not Sony branded but can be used on Sony cameras?
Canon doesn’t make lenses for Sony, so no they are not 3rd party lenses. But I can expect anything from Sony fanboys site
If you are responding to me you didn’t answer my question. Also, are you calling me a Sony fanboy?
Fair enough, they are called adopted lenses. I hope this will answer your question.
If they are Canon or Nikon lenses, they are NOT “3rd party lenses”. When people say “3rd party lenses” it’s generally Sigma, Tamron, Tokina etc etc. They generally make lenses for ALL mounts. Does Canon or Nikon make lenses that can be mounted to the a7/a7R WITHOUT any adapters? -NO.
Posting pictures of Canon, Nikon, or ANY lens USING an adapter with the a7/a7R is NOTHING new, and really NOTHING special.
Well, these lenses are actually all really SOMETHING special (maybe except the 24-105)..
Maybe he calls it 4th party lenses… 🙂
This guy at least attempted to answer the question and didn’t add ego and pretension.
Apparently you are not able to see a joke?!?
And, btw, what has my joke to do with ego and/or pretension?
Stay cool plz.
As Ken indirectly said – a 3rd party is something that is manufactured for direct usage (in this context lenses with native e-mount).
Ahmad mentioned below how it could be called – “adopted lenses”.
Dude read my comment again. I gave you credit for your joke but apparently you’ve also joined the bandwagon of delirium.
No delirium – just lacking a native english tongue 🙂
Ok cool. I’ll love you again.
Westung time sony 7 and 7R is fail Because Light Leak and Shutter Vibration
Learn to write troll.
Westing time Sony 7 and 7r is Light Leak , Shutter Viblration , is Fail Camera From Sony
gtfo troll, thats a non issue on the a7s, fuji x-t1 has light leaks, canon has it too on the 5d series, Nikon also, Shutter vibration its just bs theres no owners of a7s complaining about it, all dlsr will vibrate when the mirror slaps, but mirror less have no mirror : P
Totally wrong Jason. A7s have all the issues in the world, I have one, and the difference between us and you is you still can’t admit it.
What’s totally wrong? Plenty of cameras out there have light leaks. And, while there’s a shutter vibration, it is not an issue for the majority of shooters.
Oh no, I have A7 and I will write anything I want about the company that I bought my Camera from, and that clearly doesn’t make me a troll. You on the other hand either and investor who fights for his shares in Sony Corp., or a just fanboy, in either cases go and play with your toy far from my comments.
Haha, yeah, sure. You will write anything you want even if it is complete nonsense. You are just a simple troll. Why did you buy the a7, if it so horrible? Lapse in judgement?
Ignored.
You do know you could always sell your camera, right? Just get your money back, all this complaining make you seem like a frustrated child who can’t figure out a simple problem. I feel sorry for you if this is how you handle serious issues. All these so called “flaws” are greatly over exaggerated and some involve situations that most people will never be in. There have been simple fixes posted online for some of these “problems” that people just don’t want to try for themselves.
Does my complaining hurt you SHEEP, apparently yes. So you can solve your problems by just ignoring my posts.
Cheers
Are you kidding? “Not an issue?” Shutter vibration renders my a7r useless between 1/100 and 1/250.
That’s where most of f5.6 pictures are taken!
Or maybe you don’t use 1/125, for example?
Zoran, don’t waste your time mate, they’re not gonna get it.
My barber doesn’t cut my hair perfectly, but I can still go outside and be human. 🙂
This comment makes no sense but your hot so its ok.
In addition Nikas, lack of accessories, lack of lenses, lack of flashes, horrible speed and battery life and last but not least, awful corners.
Well played Sony.
Oh, you are troll. Took me 3 comments of yours to confirm, but now I know.
Oh no, I have A7 and I will write anything I want about the company that I bought my Camera from, and that clearly doesn’t make me a troll. You on the other hand either and investor who fights for his shares in Sony Corp., or a just fanboy, in either cases go and play with your toy far from my comments
Copy and paste that one more time, just in case.
If you can’t take better photos with a a7/A7r than with any other mirrorless, the problem is behind the camera.
When people said learn how to use your tool, I’m sure you misinterpreted it 😀
And I assume that you are better photographer than me.
Go play with your Sony toys kid.
I am, what’s your point tiny?
another retard replying for the wrong post … lol
You’re wrong, right post. Why are you so full of hate and show a lack of compassion when you decide to? Engage in helpful conversations, not trash people. Sad, to each his own, I just wanted to see what is it. Using the word retard is really not good. If you disagree, fine, have a good one, and I’ll keep people like you in prayers, C’est tout!! God loves you too!
What helpful conversations, read before you comment please.
I have a Canon 24mm TS-E on mine.
This is really sad. Do you guys even take pictures?
I can see they do take pictures of A7 with some 3rd party lenses.
Totally true mate, I have A7 and I feel happy when I see lenses mounted on that camera. really sad but true.
well played Sony.
These seem to be of the right proportion. No doubt whiners would be whining again about center of weight and ergonomics and whatnot.
where’s the Ultimate a7 + Leica Noctilux f0.95?
here is one, at f/4, not open,
https://www.flickr.com/photos/dierktopp/12124138223/in/set-72157638007397026
Why the watermark on the picture? Afraid that people will steal the lo-res version and make money on them? Pretty sad….
These pictures show that these alien lenses make A7 look totally unproportioned. Canon is for Canon. Sony should come out with their own (Zeiss) lenses designed for the small A7 body. This tinkering is just an excuse for not having FE lenses.
I’d rather see the result of using each lens than just photos of them mounted on the camera, but to each his own.
You can see some of my Sony A7 photos with various vintage lenses and the result of using each lens here if you’re interested.
http://james.sl/blog/sony-a7-4-months-in/
SONY Are you listening ??? Give us some compact, yet FAST FE lenses! 35 1.4 / 50 1.2 / 85 1.2 and all our problems in the world are solved . 😀 .. and make them affordable! Fuji just released their 56 1.2 – you can do better!!
No they cannot, Zeiss can make better
Exactly, it’s the obvious solution! 🙂
You’re looking at the price of an aps-c lens and expecting them to price similar for full frame? Not going to happen, Check out the price difference between the Canon 85 f1.2L and the 50 f1.2L and those are full frame. A Sony Zeiss 85 1.4 in Australia on the grey market is roughly $1800 and I would expect an FE mount to price similar. Listen to the howls when it gets announced
What’s the magnification factor?
I have never liked Sony, but I do think that is a real nice looking camera and it does it without any retro pre tense.
here is the A7R with Canon 17mm/4 TS-E on Metabones adapter
https://www.flickr.com/photos/dierktopp/11133112845/in/set-72157633246461268
and an image with this combo (two stitched shifted images)
https://www.flickr.com/photos/dierktopp/11980531395/in/set-72157638007397026
and A7R with Micro Nikkor PC 85mm/2.8 on Metabones adapter
https://www.flickr.com/photos/dierktopp/12704105085/in/set-72157633246461268
Those are lenses huh? 🙂
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-wb0Z6M4hHtM/Ur5SAIPirRI/AAAAAAAAAR0/6dFk_GPPrTA/s1600/bDSC00268.jpg
this is a bit OT as it it is not the A7, but may be of some interest for the Sony/NEX community
NEX7-IR (modified for infrared) and Hasselblad Distagon 40mm on Rhinocam adapter
https://www.flickr.com/photos/dierktopp/9370726877/in/set-72157634801332367
and the NEX-6 on 4×5″ large format camera Sinar P with Rhinocam adapter
https://www.flickr.com/photos/dierktopp/12841789045/in/set-72157641670093123
You call this sexy?
i cant help but to think about all the new clientele sony would get if they would just release something like the L series from canon, three fast signature 35, 50, 85 primes that are expensive but not out of this world expensive like the otus.
Wish he had used a more stylish strap as well