Sabine Acahaya
Mme Butterfly
1) You can share your pics by using the message box on our 43rumors Facebook page (Click here).
2) All 43rumors readers pictures can be seen here: facebook.com/43rumors/photos. Like the pictures you like and chat with the authors if you want to know how they took the shot!
3) The most liked pictures and some pics selected by myself will be posted weekly on 43rumors
This is the weekly selection:
Finn Gonschior
Cholita Wrestling (Bolivia)
Olympus E-M1 + 17mm 1.8 @ 1.8 ISO 800
www.facebook.com/finguinphotography
www.finguintravel.com
Michel Mayerle
Olympus E-M1, PanaLeica Nocticron 42.5mm f/1.2
Natural light only
Charles Brooks Photographer
Focus test of the SlrMagic 25 f0.95 on a Panasonic GF1
Photo by Charles Brooks
Cello by Malcolm Collins of New Zealand
Ilya Varivchenko
Dasha, OM-D EM5, Sigma 60/2.8
Ekah Chi
Lady with her Dogs. E-M5 with 12-40mm at 40mm, f/5, and 1/250s.
Teemu Paukamainen43rumors
Yesterday at 4:09pm · Tampere, Finland ·
Olympus E-M5 + Panasonic 100-300mm f/4-5.6. Shot through a safety glass.
Locsmandisz
Olympus OM-D E-M5 + M.Zuiko 17mm f1.8
19 Responses
I love Ilya’s and the Bolivian makes me feel how useful would it be to have a 35mm lens equivalent like this 17 1.8 😀
The weekly photos selection on Sony Rumor is a lot better. Check out this week’s: http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/this-week-sar-readers-photos-selection-24/
great photos indeed, but your intentions are very lowly. Try to keep the christmas thought for a change.
Sorry but I don’t see anything better or worse there, just some damn fine photography (particularly the low sun shots) other than that the photographs are simply on a par with what we see here and in Fuji rumours, just good images shot by good photographers with a good eye.
Wow, some great pictures there. Love them!
None of those images is valid for evaluating sensor performance under laboratory conditions, which is what photography is all about. You should use standardized tests, not real world situations that you can never replicate exactly.
Cameras are interesting as examples of technological progress, especially with respect to imaging sensor technology. If your interests really are more about art and aesthetics than science and technology, then you might as well pick up a paintbrush or a pencil, in my valid opinion.
photography is what these photos show, not about tests as you decribe it. but I sense other motives then trying to give a professor attitude here. Dismiss!
it seems you didn’t get the irony?
hmm even after you noticed it as that,i just see some reply which wants to add some useless remark. If you manage to show the irony in this, then i will publish an apologise. (though i prefer not to lol)
I too interpreted the post as a joke, a caricature of the kind of gearhead who seems more interested in test charts and numbers than actual photos. Every camera gear forum on the internet seems to have at least one of those. But if he was serious, then it’s very sad.
well its kind of confusing for simple minds like me.
I love you!
Sabine’s contribution rocks. I like the photography quality of all contributors. These peope are not talkers (well maybe they are but they do it thru the lens)
TY Ulli 🙂
Well done Sabine! Really nice. Im on my phone so cant appreciate it in all its glory but it sure looks fine on here. Care to share how u did this?? This was shot in studio and the background was composited in ?
yes, studio shot on grey background (EXIFS are in the image) and added an image from Becan (Mayan site) as BG. I usually try to take BG puctures when i travel, sometimes just for fun and as stock and sometimes already with an idea in the back of my mind. In this case the image was already very nice with the Studio BG because the model was great at moving her arms to let the fabric fly while still loking good. Being able to ahoot at 1/200s helped to get a good capture of the flying fabric with just enough blur but not too much.
Thought u might have also composited the flying fabric. Great capture anyway. She looks like a venus 🙂 You deserved first place.
I’m giving it to Charles Brooks. Only picture that doesn’t feel predictable. I like the one by Meyerle as well, but because the subject is quite beautiful in a very natural way. Great job.
The usual boring stuff, with the usual artifacts. Yawn.