Edmondo Senatore
OLYMPUS OMD EM5
Time for our weekly 43rumors reader picture show. As usual you can see all our images on the 43rumors FB wall. These are just some of the pics that got most of the readers likes (or my own personal like):
Claudio Franco
The sky in Rio de Janeiro on April 27, 2014
Panasonic GX7 + 14-140mm f3.5-5.6
1/160s, f5.2, 61mm
https://www.flickr.com/photos/claudiohfg
Chad Kruger
https://www.flickr.com/photos/94046993@N08/8646031821/
Francisco José Duarte Silva
Life / Vida
All effects within E-M1 Camera Processing.
Image overlay of two RAW files taken with Olympus E-M1.
First picture with Oly 12-40 PRO Lens; second one with MMF-3 adapter + teleconverter 2x + Oly 70-300.
Finally, in camera RAW data edit of the overlayed image ( don’t forget,… to make this possible it is necessary to have RAW+Jpeg enabled during procedure )
Locsmandisz
Olympus OM-D E-M5 + ZD 17mm f1.8 — in Sopron, Hungary.
Márcio Kabke Pinheiro
Lou Barlow from Sebadoh, in a concert in Rio de Janeiro. Olympus E-M10 + Olympus 75mm f/1.8
Aprison San
Olympus EP5 & Lumix G Fish Eye 8mm F3.5
38 Responses
Márcio, Cláudio, Francisco… Todos brasileiros?
Even don’t having these cameras oficially supported here in Brazil.
(are you hearing, Olympus / Panasonic?) 🙂
Probably I’ll be in Rio and Salvador by the end of September! Can’t wait! 🙂
Mandou bem Márcio!! Na foto e no comentário. Uma pena que as empresas não dão a mínima atenção a um mercado tão grande e promissor.
Todos a mesma lingua e a mesma paixão por fotografia… eu sou português
How strange, that these excellent photos are not crippled by not having the depth of field of a full frame canon 85mm at f/1.2? I can only assume that the readers who own these very nice photos are not the same people who flood the discussion on this board.
You do realize you just started that same discussion?
agreed why start something if its better to comment on the impact of a good shot?
Usually m43bashers don’t post their photos. 🙂 (I don’t have FB so I can’t see all pictures from readers here)
Exactly, M43 bashers are too smart for FB, M43 shooters instead are right there – with some exceptions of course, but are you really proud to be one and blow your trumpet? I would be ashamed.
Personally I’m proud of what I do. And it seems that friends and customers like what I do, even if I don’t use a medium format camera.
I think it’s a little early for customers, but hey, if everybody’s happy, why spoil the party?
I think you should care about your customers. 😉 and your pictures.
Just offering free advice, but alas, so is today’s youth: learning is overrated.
Wiser and better suggestions, and congratulations, came from international master photographers. Actually I had the luck to meet and know them, as well as their outstanding works (Fontana, master of colors, Berengo Gardin, master of photojournalism, Sebastiao Sallgado, no need to introduce him). Can’t say anything about your pictures since I have never seen anything from you. Therefore you can’t climb on a desk and pretend to judge other people photos and give free advices that smell like bitter envy.
Yes sunshine, I am envious of your pictures, you got me. Now, go learn the basics, then we talk.
No, I won’t talk to someone acting like The Naked Emperor showing his new clothes. 🙂 you don’t deserve to teach me anything and I’m not even interested in your pictures. Goodbye and enjoy life sweetie.
Ashamed of what Pro???
Quality-wise, these photos could have been taken with a compact camera; content-wise, they are not particularly interesting. Add some talent, then add a proper camera, then you may get something real. However, with that sort of talent, you’ll be fine with a compact camera. Once again: why waste money on M43?
What are you saying? These are pro pics taken with gear with “pro” written on. LOL
LOL true.
These photos are not excellent, but they would still benefit from a better camera. The mountain view has a badly blown sky, for example. Latitude is surely tight. No, Canon and Nikon are not on the same level.
The first photo is more or less a fake. The sun is shining through three church windows, but there is only one window-shaped spot of light on the floor.
with that height and distance of those windows, the other two very possible to cast light on the area outside picture. The titles row on the left of the kid only as big as the divider between two windows.
It is a real beautiful photography. Look at the direction of the lights !!!! The two other lights go to the left, outside of the photo…
That is the very problem with the image,
If it is lit by sunlight, which is surely the suggestion, all three
windows would cast a beam of light in a similar direction, purely from the
distance of the light source, note how both the windows to the left have a
similar beam. This suggests to me a strong light source not far away from
the exterior of the building. Another issue, why not stand the child in
the beam, not on the near edge where it provides a poor silhouette.
Again some nice shots, my favs this time being the 2 color photos from Chad & Claudio
Chads’ a classic example of Colour giving a Monochrome image.
It wasn’t a monochrome image. I did alter the colour just a tad through hue settings. It is, in fact, one of my most unaltered images.
Hi Chad, I think you misunderstood my comment, I did not say it was a monochrome image, I did say it was colour image. Yours is primarily blue through to white, which effectively makes it a monochrome as black through to white is. It is too easy to mistake monochrome as meaning ‘black and white’, while many of us miss the ‘mono’, which means one or singular so as black is one so is blue, red or yellow. I know there is the slightest trace of yellow in the image but for all intent and purpose it is blue, and shades of.
Actually, I reread your statement right after I posted and thought that I may have misunderstood. Thanks for the clarification.
Glad you like it. Thanks for the appreciation.
a bit strage the ratio of some pictures is not 4/3
4/3 is not 4:3. Different things.
Cropped?
As the photographer I am always try to use full available frame of the picture. It is automatically that the composition of the picture corresponding to 4/3. If i shooting with APS-C time to time I need some adaptation to different ratio. I think we are lucky to have 4/3 frame so it is right way to use it in 100%, IMHO
We are so luckys to having 43.
I usually shoot 4/3 myself, although many will set their camera to 3:2, even on a 4/3 sensor. Sometimes, however, during editing, you discover cropping might actually be best, or if you are sizing for a frame, etc.