Check out the three video on youtube (click here). It is easy to see that the Samsung NX-10Samsung NX-10
Samsung NX-10
Samsung NX-10
Samsung NX-10
Samsung NX-10
Samsung NX-10
Samsung NX-10
Samsung NX-10
Samsung NX-10
Samsung NX-10
is the worst camera here. The NEX-5 and the Panasonic GF1
Panasonic GF1
are almost on par with the GF1 having the less worse results (in my opinion).
11 Responses
I think you like the panasonic, because you shake the other cameras faster!!!
But the Samsung-AF is in fact a SF: Search focus 😉
Well done to think of somtehnig like that
Not sure if NEX or GF which one is better, but Samsung is the worst, I agree. The difference between NEX and GF could be neglected.
Ugh I feel dizzy, LOL, Thanks for sharing.
Oh, by the way, those are a lot of ‘ka-me-ra’ books 😉
I think the NEX is the best because I say so and I’m getting the Sony.
I think the NEX has the best performance in this test. I viewed the videos in the order of: NEX-5, GF1, NX-10. At first I didn’t even know what I was looking for until I got to the GF-1 video. I had to go back to check the NEX vid.
Wow — totally agree with Peter — I watched each a couple of times and he is shaking the Sony much faster than the other two! — especially on the horizontal move. Given that, I’d say the Sony is the best here, since it demonstrates a similar amount of roll as the Panny while being shaken much faster. The Samsung is certainly the worst of the bunch, and can’t seem to maintain focus either.
Actually, it is possible that the faster shaking may actually make the rolling shutter harder for our eyes to spot, but whatever the case, NEX is clearly at least as good as the GF1 here, while the NX-10 is way behind. With not only Micro 4/3rds but now NEX on the market, NX is dead (then and again, I always thought it was doomed from the beginning).
Shaking it faster makes the rolling shutter MORE obvious as the faster you move, the more diagonal the effect is. In this test, it was VERY clear that the GF1’s shaking wasn’t nearly as fast as the NEX5 and I STILL felt that the NEX5 had less of the rolling shutter effect.
The NEX wins this one easy in my opinion.
That’s true all other things being equal, but once you get past a certain speed, our eyes start to have difficulty tracking the movement accurately, which in this case may actually make it harder for us to actually see the rolling shutter effect. But once again, I agree that the NEX is at least as god as the GF1, and quite possibly a little better. And there’s no doubt who the loser is.:-)
They couldn’t move Samsung faster because books would fall from the shelf :).
For me, NEX=GF1, unnoticeable until you stop the video.