Photographyblog (Click here) just posted their XZ-1 review. There’s alot to like: “The camera ticks all the boxes that any experienced photographer is looking for – “sensible” pixel count, a very fast lens, raw file support, a reliable multi-point AF system and a well implemented manual exposure mode complete with an optional live histogram“…”In summary the Olympus XZ-1 is a very attractive and well thought-out – if a bit expensive – digital compact camera that appeals to a wide range of users and presents a real threat to the likes of the Canon Powershot S95, Panasonic Lumix LX5 and Samsung EX1.” The camera gets Highly Recommended!
XZ-1 direct shop links: Amazon US, Adorama, BHphoto, Amazon DE, Amazon UK, Amazon FR
9 Responses
According to samples I’ve seen the camera is good, very good, but not a overthrower of nor LX3 nor LX5, not at all.
I do really like this camera. I would have a hard choice if I had not already bought an E-PL1, moving up from a basic P&S.
It’s interesting to see that the XZ1 seems to get a highly recommended in all serious reviews so far – and so much bad critics from users who haven’t actually touched the camera, yet. (incl. defending the LX5 or S95 cameras).
I’m looking forward finally have Oly colors in a compact, again, and can easily live with some very academic ISO disadvantages etc. compared to its peers.
but it’s a real piece of junk.
move on now, move on,
nothing to see here.
The real pieces of junk are the three yawners they announced today. This one at least has a good lens.
Or the Nikon Coolpix P300. Now there’s a real phone-in POS from the company that is supposedly going to “eat everybody’s lunch” at the mirrorless table. You see, George, Olympus and Panasonic aren’t the only ones releasing slack-jaw cameras…
Check out the XZ-1 Killer from Nikon:
http://www.nikonusa.com/Nikon-Products/Product/Compact-Digital-Cameras/26246/COOLPIX-P300.html
So much better than the XZ-1.
ROTFLMAO!!! I hope it’s OK to quote a few lines from the P300 hands-on at dpreview:
——– begin quotes ———
“It also offers Full HD video (1080p as opposed to 720p), but its true colors are betrayed by a lower price-point, a smaller sensor (1/2.3″ as opposed to 1/1.6″ or 1/1.7″), and the inability to record RAW files.”
” It certainly offers comparable build quality and manual control but its sensor is 35% smaller and that’s arguably the most important determinant of image quality, so we’d expect its performance to be more in line with regular compacts.”
“Because, all other things being equal, a smaller sensor means less control over depth of field, the P300 doesn’t match up to its high-end competitors despite seeming to offer a similar maximum aperture range. Also, for good depth of field control the lens really needs to be fast at the telephoto end, and the P300’s isn’t. So don’t expect to be able to get the same sort of blurred backgrounds with the P300 as you can with the Olympus XZ-1, for example.”
——- end quotes ————
CHEAPER than the XZ-1?
Yes.
BETTER than the XZ-1?
Not even close.
This 8-7 days scientific demo conducted in Elluru, India in 2004 explored the efficacy of the
Garcinia cambogia extract taken by itself or merged with Gymnema
sylvestre extract (GSE) and niacin dependent chromium
(NBC).