Advertisement
SNAPCLOUDBack up every photoUnlimited RAW storage, 30 days freeTry freeSample ad
Advertisement
Advertisement

UPDATED: Also the GF1 has been hacked! It can do 1080p -> GF1 video samples (32Mbit)!!!

UPDATE: The GH1 hack also works for the Panasonic GF1Panasonic GF1Panasonic GF1Panasonic GF1Panasonic GF1Panasonic GF1Panasonic GF1Panasonic GF1Panasonic GF1Panasonic GF1Panasonic GF1Panasonic GF1Panasonic GF1!!! The video above has been shot with:
1920x1080p
29,970fps
32Mbit
lens:
Panasonic 20mm f/1.7
Panasonic 45-200mm

[Thanks J.]

—-
And one more Panasonic GH1Panasonic GH1Panasonic GH1Panasonic GH1Panasonic GH1Panasonic GH1Panasonic GH1Panasonic GH1Panasonic GH1Panasonic GH1Panasonic GH1Panasonic GH1Panasonic GH1 video sample has been posted on vimeo:

Tester13’s Firmware Hack test, before – after comparison from Gunther Machu on Vimeo.

Shot with kitlens at f8, 1/160 shutter, iso 100, manual in creative movie mode at 5300K. For MJPEG, the settings of Pappas (see thread MJPEG 70Mbits+ 1080p settings) were used, for AVCHD the “safe” settings indicated at the end were used (from jobless, see thread AVCHD high bitrate tests, mud free footage).

I tried to keep the pans at the same pace, but thats difficult. What is incredible, the MJPEG clearly shows a better resolution (I used just the 1440x1080p settings as my card is only class6), plus the AVCHD shows no mud and increased resolution (before, on low contrast scenes islands of unsharp areas could be seen), as can be clearly seen in the comparison (e.g. look at the shadow area right to the gardenhouse).

Share this story
Community

Join the discussion

19 Responses

  1. Answering my own question…

    Apparently the GH1 hack works on the GF1 !!!!!!!!!
    It’s incredible how one single man (with the help of the community) can reposition Panasonics line of m43 cameras as far as video is concearned…

  2. Just think of that maybe there is a reason for the lower resolution used.

    As if the sensor and processor can do it but the sensor get too hot or something such, smaller package, may suck to ruin the camera.

    Or maybe it’s just to sell more expensive cameras, who knows..

  3. >As if the sensor and processor can do it but the sensor get too hot or something
    Video resolution doesn’t affect sensor temperature.

  4. Great news for m4/3 as a whole. Hopeffully, all other cameras get these kind of updates, not only for video. Maybe someone could hack 1/2000 s E-PL1 shutter speed limit and its 3-stop IS.

  5. I even heard that because there is less compression going on, the DSP has to work less to compress the data, so there is actually less heat produced – not sure if it is true or not, but remember reading that somewhere on the DVXUser thread. The sensor is capturing the same info no matter what happens downstream, so it is not working “harder”.

  6. I’m not sure exactly why but this site is loading extremely slow for me. Is anyone else having this problem or is it a issue on my end? I’ll check back
    later and see if the problem still exists.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search

Search
Advertisement
SNAPCLOUDBack up everyphotoTry freeSample ad

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

*Please also check your spam folder if you don't get the confirmation mail. And mark the mail as "non-spam" to see the future newsletter.

Advertisement
SNAPCLOUDBack up everyphotoTry freeSample ad
Advertisement
GRIPLINEPro camerastraps &bagsDiscoverSample ad
Advertisement
PHOTOGEARUp to30% offcamerasSee dealsSample ad