Let’s keep talking about past Olympus cameras and today I will shortly introduce you to the [shoplink 35694 ebay]PEN-EED (auctions here on eBay)[/shoplink]. As you see it had a built in optical viewfinder. Produced from 1967 to 1972, it is a more expensive automated-exposure model, with a CdS meter, a 32mm f/1.7 lens and a hot shoe. Why did Oly created the EED? The Pen E had no fast lenses and only slow shutter speeds, The Pen D’ had no automatic exposure. The EED combined the best from both cameras. And how did Olympus advertise this camera? Just look at the image here:
LOL!
A list of all PEN-EED auctions can be found on [shoplink 35694 ebay]eBay (Click here)[/shoplink] or via Slidoo (Click here).
Source: Olypedia, pdf manual at Butkus, Image samples can be seen at Rangefinderforum.
33 Responses
If they wanted to market a Pen at men, they shouldn’t have called it ED but XL. 😛
WHat is their “Ladies” camera called? PEN-IS.
PEN with Image Stabilization?
Ladies have shaky hands, that’s why they can’t become good doctors.
Mty dentist is a woman. She can fit both her hands in my mouth at the same time! 😛
You guys are too funny!
Regardless…the camera is very cool looking.
Today, ED is a well known shorthand for something men do not want to have and women do not want to experience. At the time of the PEN shomw above, the abbreviation was less familiar, as papa’s little helpers had not been invented yet.
Interesting model but no for this era .
Olympus to redesign the camera in more fashionable way , example the DMC GX1 for the new coming PENs .
Just finished reading the Sigma DP3 , very impressive sensor technology . This is where M4/3 need to learn in it’s sensor department .
> Just finished reading the Sigma DP3 , very impressive sensor technology
Very shitty sensor tech except for bright mid day light.
Might as well glue ND8 filter in front of Bayer sensor to simulate light gathering efficiency.
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/post/36405363
Bayer sensor didn’t get its current level of efficiency overnight.
Still we can dream of the time when Foveon is not single true-color sensor on the market.
Advance in sensor manufacturing tech can’t help Foveon to catch Bayer sensor.
Bad efficiency is simply inherent feature of Foveon’s stacked photosite design which makes most of the signal useless “white noise” without any colour information.
Are you an internet expert? Do you read dpreview?
If image stabilization technology existed that time, it would be a great seller for women as well… Pen w/ IS or Pen IBIS =)
The name PEN-IS didn’t attracted many male customers…
Interesting post on the day of the launch of my next camera….. the Fujifilm X100s. Looks like a really big year for Fuji. My OMD will have company soon.
True enough and I’m really liking the X100S as well. It’s definitely on my radard.
But I want to know where all the E-P5 rumours are? Would love to get some info on that and whether Oly will finally add the left side EVF to the Pen series to compete with the X-E1 and NEX-6 offerings. Basically an E-M5 minus the hump and weather-sealing, in a smaller package.
Dear admin,
As you like digging into Pen history, you may want to look at a film role for one of them.. It was in an Alfred Hitchcock film (Topaz, I think), and one of the Pen SLRs featured quite prominently, body and telephoto lens being hidden in bread rolls ready for a spying trip. I think they got their pictures on a picnic overlooking a sensitive sight, but were given away by seagulls going for the bread! The camera featured more prominently in a major film than I recall from any other instance of cameras shown in a film.
Dear admin,
As you like digging into Pen history, you may want to look at a film role for one of them.. It was in an Alfred Hitchcock film (Topaz, I think), and one of the Pen SLRs featured quite prominently, body and telephoto lens being hidden in bread rolls ready for a spying trip. I think they got their pictures on a picnic overlooking a sensitive sight, but were given away by seagulls going for the bread! The camera featured more prominently in a major film than I recall from any other instance of cameras in a film.
All I know is that James Stewart’s character in Hitchcock’s ‘Rear Window’ used an Exacta with a 400 mm Kilfitt lens to spy on his murderous neighbor.
The autocensor filters my post because of the name Alfred Hitchrooster? 😛
It’s a ULC! Ugly Little Camera.
Admin, this little game is enticing. Give us little hints about what the upcoming PEN is NOT and in the meantime broaden our education.
Has the baby arrived yet?
Hi Admin,
I cannot access the site anymore from Work, since a while now. That usually happens only with low reputation sites and the like! Do you know how I could bypass that block?
thanks and keep up the good Work!
M.
You should ask your boss about that. Then the IT guy. 😛
The mystery is why lenses from 40 years ago had wider apertures than they do today.
Now, I am no expert, but I play one on TV 🙂
A few ideas on lens speed could be related to AF issues and lens design… moving heavy lens elements on traditional designs may not be as easy as with AF mechanism… Maybe the types of glass and coatings used today add more expense… Maybe the pressures on resolution and glass quality make making fast lenses very expensive… Maybe a bit of all of the above combined with marketing playing a role in pricing or volumes…
To be honest I dont know, It would be an interesting question to get an answer to..
Erm, what’s an Amarcode?
Amarcord is a Fellini movie, you Philistines! 😛
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0071129/
Ok ok! Now what’s a Philistine???
Anyway, Amarcord is available on pay per view. Maybe I’ll check it out and see how it’s related to old cameras. 🙂
Yeah, what’s an Amacorde?
That would be a spelling error.
batch image converter and photo resizer, that supports more than 50 graphic formats including GIF, JPG, PNG, BMP, TGA, SVG, TIFF, ICO, PICT, PCT, PSD, Digital Photo RAW formats and many others. Free to try it right now !
Install the “Graphic Converter”
Download for Mac: http://www.applemacsoft.com/graphic-converter/index.html
Download for Windows: http://www.graphic-converter.net/easy-graphic-converter.htm
Do you mind if I quote a couple of your articles as long as I provide credit and sources back
to your webpage? My website is in the exact same area
of interest as yours and my users would definitely
benefit from some of the information you present here.
Please let me know if this alright with you.
Thank you!