Panasonic GH3 External Battery w/ P&C GearBox GB-2 DSLR Video Cage (via Cheesycam).
LX7 review at Digitalphotographyschool.
Tilt adapter for Micro Four Third – Part 3 – Simple adapter at Drinkcat.
GH3 images now at Imaging Resource Comparometer.
Alex: “I am still puzzled by the lack of noticing the dynamic range of the GH3, not less after the DxOmark of the GH3 showing it equal to the OMD – Which if you look at the attached can not possibly be true… The OMD is way behind when it when it comes to highlight. The shoot out is from this link: http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/post/50378636”
Farrukh: “Am back at London Fashion Week shooting with an EP3 and the 45mm f1.8. You can see some of my Backstage and Catwalk photos here: https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.366779943428268.66758.341504945955768&type=1”
Espen: “Looks like the Nauticam under water housing for the DMC-GH3 is right around the corner, they will showcase the housing at the NAB show in april: http://nab13.mapyourshow.com/5_0/exhibitor_details.cfm?exhid=410905&CFID=89448138&CFTOKEN=ea65bbf280d0a3e9-EEA1621E-A092-3054-FD418731D33F6C03 “Nauticam is the worlds premier manufacturer of underwater camera housings and accessories. Visit the Nauticam booth to see housings for the Canon 1DC, Panasonic GH3, RED EPIC and SCARLET, SmallHD DP4 and more.”
Cody: “I just posted my 1st gh3 video w/lumix 35-100mm. I used the i0S app & ETC mode also! Enjoy https://vimeo.com/59870449”
Kyle: “$249 Canadian with free shipping for PEN E-PM1 with 14-42 II R lens. $599 Canadian with free shipping for the DMC GF3 X with 14-42 PZ lens.“
10 Responses
How on earth does that guy at Cheesycam afford everything?? Emm I think he’s called. Seems to have every new camera, lens and toys! The guy must be loaded!! Nice!
> The OMD is way behind [the GH3]
Both seem remarkably clean to me, for ISO 3200, even the JPEGs. I think sensor and processing technology has reached a point where there is little more we could want. (Yes, this is the post-Leica me talking. 🙂 ) Remember TMZ grain?
BTW, I have found that viewing images at 50%, rather than 100%, gives a better sense of how good the color, grain, resolution, dynamic range, etc. really is. Too many distracting trivial defects and compression artifacts at 100%.
Now, if they could get to work on those brighter very-wide-angles and very-long-teles, for those of us who still use them…
“Alex”, whoever he is, doesn’t seem to know what dynamic range is, nor the difference between JPG and RAW, nor the arbitrary trade off between shadow and highlight headroom. Why is this random and obviously clueless person being quoted as a news item?
admin is out of news and rumors and is filling the gap with a new “the daily troll” category 🙂
Today we have to vote for the “oly troll of the day” for tomorrow’s headline 🙂
Well, if Alex is today’s Pany troll, I saw in the comments in his link someone was saying how the OM-D could do better video, or as good as, the GH3. I nominate him/her.
I think we only have to wait for getting better ones 🙂
btw of course the GH3 has better video capabilities, but with the combination of unstabilized primes and unprofessional attitude to work, I would not get better videos by using the GH3 🙂
panny needs IBIS like RED and ARRI cameras right?
No cinema camera, including red and arriflex, have any kind of internal image stabilization.
stfu
And what’s more disturebing is that there were different lenses used as well as different focus point.
This is not newsworthy at all.
I guess “Alex” don’t know the trade he is talking about.