Advertisement
SNAPCLOUDBack up every photoUnlimited RAW storage, 30 days freeTry freeSample ad
Advertisement
Advertisement

A bit of everything…


Dusk with the 2x SLR Magic Anamorphot

Olympus 40-150mm f/2.8 Lens Review at Fotozones.
Ikelite housing for the GX7 (Ikelite)
Metabones Speedbooster + Sigma 150-600mm= 850 mm f/4 (CameraStuffReview).
FL-LM3 is compatible with GM5/LX100 (Dpreview forum).
Free promotion for one of our friends who created a new APP: SCNX is the Photography App for the purist who loves to tell Visual Stories (here on iTunes).

Dario Viola: “A 500mm f8 zeiss mirotar on the field, Contax CY mount the lens is a mirror tele photo, so very compact, no iris control so is fix on f8, complicate focusing, but it delivers an interesting image: https://vimeo.com/114368240”

Vassilios Zacharitsev: “In light of the E-M5 mk2 introduction: a discussion of today’s shifting camera sensor technology, and going beyond the obvious image stabilization capabilities in the near future: http://www.eyesuncloudedphoto.com/blog/2015/2/19/the-mighty-ibis”

R.J. DeGuzman‎43rumors: “Got my E-M5mk2 in yesterday and the rear dial didn’t work! D’oh! Oly shooters be sure to check your dials. With all the free time I had, because I didn’t have a fully functioning camera to play around with, I made a quick video clip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XBX2-h62jAM”

Stefano: “If you want new example video with olympus omd em5 II, Full HD 1080 24p All-Intra? Just here http://youtu.be/OMQYD5QCUD0”

Nathan: “I’m Nate Cowlishaw, photographer, with 50,000 followers on Instagram @talking_tree. My Instagram community inspired me start a Kickstarter project and with no marketing budget we reached $8,000+ in just a few days: https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/wowflutes/the-great-southwestern-suzuki-adventure-0
For the last 15 years I’ve been working on a portfolio focused on the Desert Southwest. The Kickstarter project will help me reach a finale. I am doing this 9,500 mile, 65-90 day photography expedition with my Suzuki Vitara in Utah, Nevada, California, Arizona, New Mexico, Texas, Luisiana, Mississippi, Oklahoma, and Colorado. I will be taking unique photos that combine human culture & natural environments because in reality, humanity is truly inseparable from these natural landscapes. I wanted to make this available to a wider audience than just my followers and thought it might fit for your readers. Hope you enjoy it.”

 

Share this story
Community

Join the discussion

4 Responses

  1. “Speedbooster + Sigma 150-600mm = 850mm f/4” is doubly wrong. First, it’s either “425mm” or “850mm equiv.”, but never 850mm. Second, it’s f/4.5, not f/4, because one stop more than f/6.3, which is the original aperture of the lens, is f/4.5. So it’s a real 425mm f/4.5 lens and an 850mm equivalent lens with a real aperture of f/4.5 and an 850mm f/9 equivalent lens, but in no way this is or will ever be an 850mm f/4 lens.

    That said, it’s an interesting approach to use a Speed Booster with a supertele lens, as long as you don’t need every mm focal length of it – which unfortunately is often the case, though, when shooting wildlife, especially birds.

    After all, for whatever can be done with a 150-600mm plus SpeedBooster, the upcoming 300mm f/4 plus MC-14 (resulting in 420mm f/5.6) will very probably be the better choice, except that it doesn’t zoom and isn’t quite as fast. It will definitely be sharper and much smaller and lighter, though.

    1. I’ve used the camera EXIF information for the aperture.
      Metabones claims 1 stop, but both the Olympus OM-D E-M1 and the Panasonic GH4 register the combination as 426 mm f/4. And exposure is correct using f/4.

      f/8 (f/9) equivalent is correct in terms of depth of field, but not for exposure or field of view.
      For a correct exposure it really is f/4:
      f/4 426 mm at micro-43 using the speed booster @ 100 ISO 1/1000 sec yields both in terms of field of view and exposure settings the same result as a 850mm f/4 full frame lens @ 100 ISO 1/1000 sec, but a different depth of field

      Regards,

      Ivo Freriks

      1. When I say equivalence, I mean overall equivalence, like dpreview’s Richard Butler explained it in a rather good article some time ago. Hint: the same exposure at the same ISO is not equivalence, the same exposure at equivalent ISO settings is.

        Regarding f/4, I still doubt your findings. The Speed Booster cannot provide more than one stop of aperture improvement, whatever it electrically reports to the camera, which may likely be a rounding error. I own a Speed Booster myself, although only a fully-manual one for Minolta SR/MC/MD – it’s should be the same glass, though. By the way, if it would offer a greater aperture improvement than one stop, it would have to reduce the focal length further, too, than just to 0.71x. You can’t have one without the other, and while Metabones would probably be glad to be able to make a stronger focal reducer for normal M43 cameras (not just for Blackmagic video cameras, like they already do), we can be pretty sure that any currently available adapter isn’t one.

        1. Hi Hubertus,

          I know Richard’s article and I really liked it, just like Tony Northrup’s video’s about this topic. You’re right about overall equivalence and perhaps I should have used 850mm equiv. in the title.

          Both focal length and aperture seem to me not to be the easiest parameters to use in combination with overall equivalence. There’s a conflict between actual exposures settings, FOV and DOF.

          If a photographer with a 400mm f/4 lens and a camera with a full frame sensor decides to crop his image 2x, he probably will not say that he shot the image at f/8 equivalence (would you?). And he will probably say he shot the image @ 400mm and not 800mm (equivalent).

          On the other hand, I don’t even know one photographer using a compact camera (with crop factors like 6), who says he’s using a 25mm f/3 telelens, or (in overall equivalence) his 150mm wide open at f/18.

          f/4 will be a rounding error. I agree with you.

          It will be very interesting to compare the 425mm f/4.5 Metabooster + Sigma combination with the forthcoming 300mm f/4 plus MC-14 (resulting in 420mm f/5.6). In theory a teleconverter enlarges lens errors and a focal reduces (Metabones) decreases lens errors.
          Both Sigma and Olympus make very good lenses. I don’t know on forehand which combination will win optically.
          The Olympus has AF, where the metabones combination is only MF.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search

Search
Advertisement
SNAPCLOUDBack up everyphotoTry freeSample ad

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

*Please also check your spam folder if you don't get the confirmation mail. And mark the mail as "non-spam" to see the future newsletter.

Advertisement
SNAPCLOUDBack up everyphotoTry freeSample ad
Advertisement
GRIPLINEPro camerastraps &bagsDiscoverSample ad
Advertisement
PHOTOGEARUp to30% offcamerasSee dealsSample ad