Advertisement
SNAPCLOUDBack up every photoUnlimited RAW storage, 30 days freeTry freeSample ad
Advertisement
Advertisement

a bit of everything…


Sony A7R II vs Olympus E-M10 II: 5-Axis Stabilization Head-to-head

Today only: Up to 20% off on SD cards at Amazon Germany (Click here to see the list).
A Dynamic Range and Tonality Comparison of V-Log L on the GH4 (Zak Forsman).
The Fastest Memory Cards Money Can Buy (Explora).
Gone fishing: Olympus TG-4 gallery updated (Dpreview).
Sony a7S II vs Panasonic GH4 (Digitalrev).
X-T10 vs E-M5 II vs a6000: Mirrorless Shootout! (Tony Northup).

Share this story
Community

Join the discussion

21 Responses

  1. Both terrific cameras. Each according to his/her needs and budget. IBIS becomes more significant with longer lenses, which is where physical stress becomes a bigger factor due to the weight of FF lenses. If this test had been done with a much longer lens, the results probably would have been different.

    1. True – the E-M10 II uses the old generation IS system. The way they were holding the cameras was also a bit weird, but well .. it was digitalrev. They usually make funny videos and not serious tests so I would take it that way.

  2. What a stupid comparison …whit a pancake lens on the omd he can’t use the finger near the front lens as in the sony….try whit only one hand ….

  3. The E-M10 II has the old stabilizer from the EM-M5(one). Then they are even quoting from the E-M5 II website. That is kinda sad, because everybody knows its improved a lot with first the E-M1 and then it further improved in the E-M5 II.
    It would still be a fair compensation if the prizes were roughly the same, but that isn’t the case also.
    They should have tested it against the E-M5 II.

  4. comparison between GH4 and A7SII?
    if i never forget,GH4 born on Feb 2014 before A7S was released.

    that is compare 4K camera 2nd generation to 1st generate.

  5. 1. if you compare use same lens prime vs prime, zoom vs zoom – there is 25mm f/1.8 if you use 55mm 1.8 Zeiss on A7r mk2

    2. A7rII is flagship and E.m10 is entry OMD, Zeiss 55mm lens cost twice or more than omd with lens, A7rII cost 6x more without lens or 8-9x more than e-m10 with kit lens..

    3. I would like to try A7rII on even this test because i bet even entry E-m10 got better IBIS than Sony..

  6. And why they didnt test Em5II+Panasonic 42 1.2 vs A7tII+zeiss 50 1.8 in video and in hi-res vs 42mp studio photography ??

    IBIS in EM5II is far superior than one in e-m10II

  7. Just to clarify, were they using 50-mm-ish “equivalent” on both, or 50-mm-ish lenses (42 vs 55) on both?

    This video might also settle the age-old debate about whether heavier cameras are better for hand-held stabilization.

  8. Mirrorlessons has a good comparison of the E-M1 va A7 Mk II and the 2nd generation IBIS of the Olympus is comparable to the Sony on stills but clearly superior on video.

    http://www.mirrorlessons.com/2015/04/13/olympus-5-axis-stabilization-sony/

    The Digitalrev video isn’t a very useful comparison as it doesn’t compare the latest IBIS tech from Olympus with the latest from Sony. Hard to take those guys seriously sometimes.

    The top of the line Sony is four times the price of the entry leve OMD.

  9. Kinda silly comparison. And a bit long winded to be fun. But like others it should have been the EM5m11 with the grip and a prime lens especially for the stills.

    The 5 axis in video is slightly more challenging, but again a much cheaper combo was pretty much on par with the sony.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search

Search
Advertisement
SNAPCLOUDBack up everyphotoTry freeSample ad

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

*Please also check your spam folder if you don't get the confirmation mail. And mark the mail as "non-spam" to see the future newsletter.

Advertisement
SNAPCLOUDBack up everyphotoTry freeSample ad
Advertisement
GRIPLINEPro camerastraps &bagsDiscoverSample ad
Advertisement
PHOTOGEARUp to30% offcamerasSee dealsSample ad