Advertisement
SNAPCLOUDBack up every photoUnlimited RAW storage, 30 days freeTry freeSample ad
Advertisement
Advertisement

New Trimagon 95mm f/2.6 MFT lens will ship in early Summer 2016!

Bildschirmfoto 2015-11-11 um 19.30.46

We just got a new MFT lens! But you will have to wait till Summer 2016 to get it. It’s the Meyer Optik Görlitz  Trimagon 95mm f/2.6 lens. The price is yet unknown but the lens is made to have an extremely nice bokeh and to outresolve 60+ Megapixel sensors.

Technical specifications:
Aperture & Focal Length: f/2,6-22; 95 mm
Lens construction: 3 elements in 3 modules
Picture angle: 25 °
Filter Diameter: 52 mm

Characteristics:
Lens construction in classical triplet | 3 lenses / 3 groups
Iris diaphragm with 15 specially constructed aperture blades and special anti-reflective coating
Mounts: Canon, Nikon, Fuji X, Sony–E, MFT, M42 and Leica M
Available from early summer 2016

Click on the image to see the full size version:

Bildschirmfoto 2015-11-11 um 16.27.24 Bildschirmfoto 2015-11-11 um 16.27.12 Bildschirmfoto 2015-11-11 um 16.27.06

Found via MirrorlessRumors.

Share this story
Community

Join the discussion

32 Responses

    1. As I’ve said elsewhere, you might as well use the Lensbaby Velvet 56, as it seems a better deal, and that is nearly US$500. You’ll just have to go closer.

      1. Thats what I thought and came to write about 😀 Who does that? These should reprisent their creation and yet they decided on these 3 o.O

  1. They really outdid themselves, it’s designed to out resolve 60+ megapixel sensors and yet they managed to do it with only *three* lens elements. That’s a pretty amazing design.

    1. I call BS! 3 elemens can never be that good. Look at the sigma art line-up or Zeiss otus,
      those high sharpness lenses have many lens elements to achive it.

      i am sceptic until someone comes with comparisons with zeiss lenses. 100 macro planar f2 or the canon 100L f2.8 IS. those are known to be great lenses.

  2. Wil have to be very good(or cheap)with lenses as the Olympus 75mm f1.8, Panasonic 35-100 f2.8 or Olympus 40-150mm F2.8.

  3. Hey admin, look on the webpage, the price is “UVP inkl. MwSt. : 1699€”

    id rather buy a leica 90mm f2.8 for that price.

      1. the leica is a little more recent and more in the same pricerange; but any old 90 would give better images than this 3 element ugly monster.

        the Tokina 90mm f2.5 ATX is also a nice choice , has the nickname “Bokina”
        gives lovely bokeh 🙂

        1. Ok for the price.

          Also, the Samyang 85/1.4 that I bought for astrophotography. But, of course, considering the price, Samyang is just a joke :-p

  4. Wow. A company is able to make a 60+ MP lens and ask 1700€ for it but has no resources to design or buy an AF solution. Welcome to the sweet world of snobbery.

    1. It’s always amazing to see how many of the German companies design lenses for Nikon but can’t be bothered with auto focus.

  5. Even the in-focus areas look soft. Bleh. Okay, I guess we wait for real samples, these are useless. I’m not going to judge a lens that claims to be this sharp based on these images. Because if I did… I’d say this is grade-A bulloni

  6. Wow, 60 megapixels of perfectly-resolved fuzz! It won’t be available until summer 2016 because it will take until then for the designers to stop laughing.

    Meanwhile, somebody could start a cottage industry pirating defunct ’50s folding cameras for their mediocre triplet lenses, and remounting them. Meyer Trioplan, anyone?

    1. Yes…. Designed for 35mm sensor and resolve just 60Mpix…. I keep the 75mm f/1.8 as it was designed to outresolve 80Mpix 35mm sensor… Or other words a 20mpix 4/3 sensor!

  7. Pretty meh bokeh for a lens designed to give good bokeh.. I dunno why wouldn’t Sigma give us the art series lenses, I’d buy that in a heart beat.. I guess have to wait for the new lenses from oly/pana

  8. “outresolve 60+ Megapixel sensors.”

    Looks like it isn’t even resolving 4mpix, let alone 60. Very soft, at least these sample images.

  9. I thought the pics were bad image advertising… lol They are indeed terrible. looks like somebody has been shooting at 25.000 ISO. Is it a joke?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search

Search
Advertisement
SNAPCLOUDBack up everyphotoTry freeSample ad

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

*Please also check your spam folder if you don't get the confirmation mail. And mark the mail as "non-spam" to see the future newsletter.

Advertisement
SNAPCLOUDBack up everyphotoTry freeSample ad
Advertisement
GRIPLINEPro camerastraps &bagsDiscoverSample ad
Advertisement
PHOTOGEARUp to30% offcamerasSee dealsSample ad