Advertisement
SNAPCLOUDBack up every photoUnlimited RAW storage, 30 days freeTry freeSample ad
Advertisement
Advertisement

The Olympus Body Cap Lens video review by Kai (Digitalrev).

It’s a quite Sunday with no big news. But at least you have some fun (if you like Kai’s style) by watching his latest Olympus Body Cap Lens review!

Share this story
Community

Join the discussion

35 Responses

  1. The lens really intrigues me. I haven’t bought one yet, but it’s something I may do eventually. I have used a LOMO LC-A+ with it’s zone focusing and I loved it. I’m guessing this will give the same experience focusing wise. I just wish it was a fixed f/8 aperture with in an f/2.8 construction!

    1. apologise if my way of thinking was wrong. For some reason I was thinking you get more light in the lens at f/8 on a brighter lens than a lens made with an f/8 aperture. Just realised it was a pretty stupid way of thinking! My bad!

    2. cds79m — my take: it’s basically a reasonably-priced toy lens. It doesn’t give you the same weirdnesses that a Holga lens (or similar) will, but if you’re looking for a fun street photography lens, it’s pretty good (and relatively cheap). I keep one on my 2nd body instead of a cap — makes for a very slim package, and in a pinch it means the camera’s ready to go straight out of the pocket.

      As Farrukh points out, the 14mm f/2.5 takes better pictures and isn’t *much* thicker — but costs 5 or 6 times as much. So whether it’s a good deal for you is really a function what you’re looking for.

    1. +1 it works perfectly if coupled with art filters. Many will think that it’s not “pure” photography, but it’s funny anyway.

  2. I have the Panasonic 14-42mm X PZ lens, and the low profile when closed makes for a very portable camera.

  3. Kai should do other lens review instead of this one .
    Where is the 75mm review fr Kai ?
    The latest macro lens fr Oly ?
    Yes , I agree with Kai on his final word in the review ,
    “The performance of the lens doesn’t matter as it just a body cap ” .

      1. Robin Wong and Ming Thein posted two nice reviews of Zuiko17mm f1.8. By “nice” I mean that they showed how the lens performs taking well composed and suggestive photos. That’s what lead me to the decision of getting it and I’m using it a lot lately, since I love the 35mm FOV

        1. Also Steve Huff hadd a posting, he test E-M5 by 17mm F 1.8 and Sony RX1, so i look is FOV close to a 30mm.

          1. I thought you used the wrong word. Of course depth of field is different, but field of view is the same (well, 17.5mm is the same).

  4. Are you sure he knows how to use one. He usually just swings them around and crouches down and points them, then returns to gabfest.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search

Search
Advertisement
SNAPCLOUDBack up everyphotoTry freeSample ad

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

*Please also check your spam folder if you don't get the confirmation mail. And mark the mail as "non-spam" to see the future newsletter.

Advertisement
SNAPCLOUDBack up everyphotoTry freeSample ad
Advertisement
GRIPLINEPro camerastraps &bagsDiscoverSample ad
Advertisement
PHOTOGEARUp to30% offcamerasSee dealsSample ad