Advertisement
SNAPCLOUDBack up every photoUnlimited RAW storage, 30 days freeTry freeSample ad
Advertisement
Advertisement

A bit of everything…


OLYMPUS 7-14 mm f/2.8 PRO shot on GH4 [test footage]

Panasonic G7 Shooter’s Report Part I: High-octane excitement at the Indy 500! (Imaging Resource).
ED 7-14mm f/2.8 PRO Review (Photographyblog).
G7 Review at Photographyblog.
Digital camera 20th birthday

Capio Studio: “https://vimeo.com/128416726. Image & Color:  From land, to air, to sea the Panasonic GH4 takes flight in the bold demo; Image & Color.  A wise man once told me… “If images are the key to our memories… color is the fondness in which they are painted.”

Detour: “I don’t know if you are interested but i’ll post it anyway…Check this c-mount modified lens: COSMICAR 8.5mm f1.5….full cover bmpcc & super16 format….does not cover full micro 4/3 sensor. http://www.ebay.com/itm/181766688206?ssPageName=STRK:MESELX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1555.l2649”

Adam: “Hello, just wanted to share video of a styled shoot I did here in Long Beach, CA. All shot on the GH4 using SLR Magic glass (which I first heard about on this site). Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0NuUzhw05lU Vimeo: https://vimeo.com/129726545“

Share this story
Community

Join the discussion

17 Responses

  1. “The Panasonic Lumix DMC-G7 has an antishake mechanism which allows you to take sharp photos at slower shutter speeds than other digital cameras. To test this (….). As you can see, with image stabilisation turned on, the images are sharper than when it’s turned off.”

    1. Photography blog reviews the kit, not body-only G7. They did the same for literally every other Pana camera review before. I too once was outraged about this “mistake”.

  2. This only shows that while the lens performs just as well optically on a Panasonic camera, the lack of OIS on the lens/lack of IBIS on the camera means Panasonic shooters would be well advised to consider a steady-rig or gimble or similar in order to use this for hand-held filming.

  3. That Photography Blog review was terrible.
    No mention of the DFD system.
    No pictures samples done with any of the 4k modes.
    And he claimed the camera had built in optical image stabilization.
    The whole thing was just a copy & paste mess.

  4. Why would anyone want to spend $999 on a $50 TV c mount lens and why was my last comment deleted, there was NOTHING wrong with it over censorship!!!

    1. It was caught in the filter, probably from your previous name calling. Civil discourse doesn’t usually require ‘moron’, ‘prick’ or ‘tard’.

  5. Any proof of this ‘name calling’? A shame Ape isn’t moderating……a lot of people in these dumb blogs attack without certain words but they conveniently bypass your radar mate!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search

Search
Advertisement
SNAPCLOUDBack up everyphotoTry freeSample ad

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

*Please also check your spam folder if you don't get the confirmation mail. And mark the mail as "non-spam" to see the future newsletter.

Advertisement
SNAPCLOUDBack up everyphotoTry freeSample ad
Advertisement
GRIPLINEPro camerastraps &bagsDiscoverSample ad
Advertisement
PHOTOGEARUp to30% offcamerasSee dealsSample ad