Advertisement
SNAPCLOUDBack up every photoUnlimited RAW storage, 30 days freeTry freeSample ad
Advertisement
Advertisement

Cool test: Olympus AIR with the 300mm Four Thirds lens!

[shoplink 22138 ebay]OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA[/shoplink]

One of the advantages of the new Olympus AIR MFT “lens-camera” is that it allows a new kind of shooting with huge tele lenses! The picture on top shows how you can hold the [shoplink 22138 ebay]300mm f/2.8 Four Thirds lens[/shoplink] without having to use the tripod. Something that would be much harder to do if you would have a “normal” DSLR or Mirrorless camera on it.

DC.watch posted a full set of images to show how it works (Click on it to enlarge):

Image samples shot with tha combo can be seen at DC.watch.

via photorumors.

 

Share this story
Community

Join the discussion

48 Responses

    1. Using the wifi camera apps for a camera can be useful at times on my Panny camera but the lag between the camera and phone would make for a very poor user experience if that was the only way to use the camera.

      1. the lag time on the Olympus AIR is much faster than on the Panasonic and newer Olympus non-AIR cameras. It’ll never be totally lag free, but it’s pretty seamless when you watch the hands-on previews.

        1. Olympus are pretty new to this WiFi lark compared to Panasonic.
          One of the nice touches of both systems is for example mounting the camera close to a bird feeding station and using the touch screen of an iPad to set the focus point and shoot. The lag is insignificant, fast enough to freeze a bird in that instant. The iPad has a nice big screen, pretty sure there’s a way of bluetooth tethering the iPad to iPhone to maintain web connection whilst using wifi to camera. iOS may have better control than other OS
          Olympus still have EyeFi support in the (cof) menu which is a bit old hat now. I don’t know whether it is camera or software but Olympus do have slightly more lag than Panasonic, it’s more touch-think-click than touch-click.
          BTW the AF performance is excellent, even continuous tracking within the frame works well on remote burst shooting at the bird table.

          1. Excellent CAF-tr in burst mode with the 300/2.8+2x TC?…
            … I strongly doubt that!

            If the E-M1 can’t do it – why should the AIR be better?

  1. need oss or ibis and power zoom, the better combo would be a qx1 with sel28135g f 4 or a canon IS telelens

    1. Pics seem quite sharp but this RPG style shooting would not fly very well in US 😉 ( or in France for Arab looking photographers)

    2. Replace air with em10 or any camera with ibs and wifi. It will function the same, don’t look as cool though.

  2. why are you showing us this nonsense when the price has been released for the Voigtlander 10.5mm f/0.95??? 🙂

  3. I like this. I have long thought that Oly or Pany should make a tiny tiny camera with a google glass style EVF. If you think a tilty/flippy screen is good for composing at odd angles, imagine a glasses EVF!!

    1. If it can be made to work with Samsung’s Gear VR headset, then that would be one possibility.

  4. That’s crazy, but actually kind of cool.

    I would imagine that, particularly with some sort of custom shoulder brace (probably that includes a mount for the phone and eyepiece), this would be a heck of a lot more stable than trying to hand-hold, and might even work as a tripod replacement.

    You’d have to worry about somebody shooting the guy with the RPG launcher, of course…

  5. Officer, I swear this round thing at the end is a camera. Yes, I know there’s no screen. I’m actually wirelessly using my cell phone to connect and control the….wait why are you handcuffing me?

  6. Just so you know, shooting hand-held with a 300f2.8 on a dslr is quite easy and can be done by many nature and wild-life photographers. A smaller number – but still a lot – of photographers can even do it with a 500f4. Even a smaller number of them can do it with a 600f4 (fast shutter speeds needed as you can imagine).

    1. We regularly shoot the 100-300/F4-5.6 at f/6.3 to f12 hand held on mft just like any shorter lens, (that’s equivalent to 600mm on a FF), probably as low as 1/150 with its OIS. The wild life may want a faster shutter but holding the lens does not.

  7. Having now seen the actual size of that 300/F2.8 it has put me off it.
    Even the E-M5ii struggles to stabilise the Tokina 400 f/6.3 which is 13-inches long and weighs a bit.

    A lens that size need lens stabilisation tailored to itself.

  8. Sort of a bullpup design, I can see some advantages. But who would use such telezooms in narrow spaces?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search

Search
Advertisement
SNAPCLOUDBack up everyphotoTry freeSample ad

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

*Please also check your spam folder if you don't get the confirmation mail. And mark the mail as "non-spam" to see the future newsletter.

Advertisement
SNAPCLOUDBack up everyphotoTry freeSample ad
Advertisement
GRIPLINEPro camerastraps &bagsDiscoverSample ad
Advertisement
PHOTOGEARUp to30% offcamerasSee dealsSample ad