Thanks Mike Kobal!
Goodgearguide tested the Olympus E-5: “The Olympus E-5 is definitely a beast of a camera, but its low-light performance isn’t as good as its competitors, and overall its images look a little muddy (although some users may prefer this). It also takes a while to learn how to use it effectively. However, it is fast when it comes to sequential shooting as well as focusing, and it has a useful articulating screen and Live View mode.” Get the E-5 at [shopcountry 17163].
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FT3 Review (Photographyblog).
March 11 Earthquake in Tokyo taken with the GH2 (Vimeo). Get the GH2 at [shopcountry 16254]
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ20 / ZS10 High ISO JPEG Noise preview (CameraLabs).
Panasonic GF2 review (Fotopolis). Get the GF2 at [shopcountry 17361]
3Dkraft tested the audio quality of the GH2 y doing a Bariton- and Sopran-Saxophon Live-cut. The quality is very surprising good and you should hear the video using good headphones!
9 Responses
muddy your bag, roo reviewer…
E-5? Muddy? What?
I have no idea what they are talking about. I have an E-5 and my images are anything but muddy.
May they use a soiled copy of lens LOL
Never associate muddy with olympus cameras or lenses
Same for me…what do they mean with muddy? there is no explanation in the review. the only thinng they write is “image quality could be better”
‘fast’ sequential shooting and ‘muddy’ IQ, well, shant bother reading that then…
May be the meant muddy the same way DPR meant,
“The trouble really starts above ISO 400 though, where the limitations of the E-5’s sensor start to become very clear.”
and
“The drop in critical sharpness and detail resolution from ISO 400-800, for example, is more pronounced than we’ve come to expect, and by the time you get up to ISO 1600 and beyond, noise levels are disappointingly high.”
The hair and facial features in the video, look quite blurry for HD. I wonder why? I think I have seen GH-2 footage much cleaner. Sharper?
Further proof that models shouldn’t be allowed to “dance”!