Advertisement
SNAPCLOUDBack up every photoUnlimited RAW storage, 30 days freeTry freeSample ad
Advertisement
Advertisement

a little bit of everything…(+ new Olympus 14-35mm review -> sensational image quality!)


SONY NEX-VG10 Test vs 5D2 and [shoplink 14826]GH1[/shoplink]

The [shoplink 14834]Panasonic G2[/shoplink] wins the DIWA award (Letsgodigital)

Olympus Zuiko Digital ED 14-35 mm f/2.0 SWD review at Lenstip. Lenstip says that the lens has a “sensational image quality“. The only “problem” is that you have to pay a lof for the lens: $1850 on Amazon (Click here)

PDN Gear Guide Review: Leica Summilux-M 35mm f/1.4 ASPH Lens…only $4995 on Amazon (Click here) 🙂

Field Review: Panasonic GF-1 (Day 1) -> ThPhoBlographer

Which One Should I Get?: Canon S95 vs Panasonic LX-5K (ThePhoBlographer)

Share this story
Community

Join the discussion

11 Responses

  1. “The usage of a sensor which is two times smaller than a 35-mm film frame was not without reasons. Malicious people might say that the first and main reason was the inability to produce a bigger detector by Panasonic”

    LOL!

    1. Well, post your price. If it’s competitive, maybe I’ll buy it from you. I’m not sure why it was good enough to use with an E3 but won’t be with the E5, but your loss will be my gain. 😉

      And I personally am not sure why Lenstip is making an issue of “average performance against bright light”…I’ve never found it to be much of an issue:
      http://www.lemanphoto.com/images/PA035533.jpg (sort of NSFW)

  2. This is an old video,
    but is not fair because of following reasons.

    -Different focal length, especially GH1.
    -Different the size of main object, especially GH1.

    Above reasons also cause different frame and
    different exposure.

    I can’t find the meaning of this video. 🙁

  3. Were you watching the same video? Looks great to me! When I see this, I really want to get back into video… Love the dreamy bokeh!

  4. > The only “problem” is that you have to pay a lof for the lens: $1850 on Amazon

    After forking the $2K, you would find another problem: the lens weighs more than 2lb/close to 1kg!!

  5. Dear Stephen B,

    I mean the fairness, but not video quality.

    Yes, right.
    The video is great and shows dreamy bokeh.

    But as a comparison, it’s not fair.

    Did you see at 2:11?
    Only the video of GH1 shows deep DOF,
    because of the discrimination.
    Others are similar size of the lady.

    Don’t forget focal length and the distance
    with the object decide DOF.

    Even though M43 has disadvantage, it is not
    so much different from NEX-5.
    Above video shows us the shallow of NEX-5 is
    similar with 5D Mark II, but much shallow
    than GH1.
    Of course, it’s not true.

  6. I must confess that the only wish that i have about having a OLY body is to get this lens one day…im serious…its a dream…a goal…..

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search

Search
Advertisement
SNAPCLOUDBack up everyphotoTry freeSample ad

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

*Please also check your spam folder if you don't get the confirmation mail. And mark the mail as "non-spam" to see the future newsletter.

Advertisement
SNAPCLOUDBack up everyphotoTry freeSample ad
Advertisement
GRIPLINEPro camerastraps &bagsDiscoverSample ad
Advertisement
PHOTOGEARUp to30% offcamerasSee dealsSample ad