Advertisement
SNAPCLOUDBack up every photoUnlimited RAW storage, 30 days freeTry freeSample ad
Advertisement
Advertisement

(FT5) The new Panasonic 8mm fisheye specs

Tomorrow Panasonic will launch the new 8mm f/3.5 fisheye lens. We didn’t receive any price indication yet but at least we have some technical details of the lens:
– 10 elements in 9 groups (1 ED lens)
– 7 diaphragm blades / circular aperture diaphragm
– No optical image stabilizer
– It can’t take filter
– closest focusing distance 0.1m
– maximum magnification 0.20x – 0.40x
– diagonal angle of view 180°
– overall length 51.7mm
– weight 165g

It comes with a lens cap, lens rear cap and a storage bag.

Share this story
Community

Join the discussion

13 Responses

  1. The minimum focus distance looks very promising for creative pics…. I was planing to buy the Oly 9-18 but maybe I wil go for this one instead…. hmmm… It gonna be a tough decision!

  2. This lens would cost anything between $400-$600. The Samyang 8/3.5 fisheye will be very valid, cheaper alternative for adapter owners. Autofocus is a non-issue with this class of lenses.

  3. But will the Samyang be 180 degrees (diagonal) for Fourthirds? How could it, if it’s designed for a larger image circle?

  4. I just find it interesting how many of the most interesting Panasonic lenses don’t have IS. Seems like they are doing a good job of making lenses for the Olympus cameras and giving people a reason to buy their competitors.

    Its valid that many uses of this lens would be tripod, but still, there’ll be exceptions. Just odd that Pany and Olympus differentiate on the in lens vs in body IS.

  5. Image stabilization isn’t really need on fisheye or extra wide angle lenses, I’ve been using the Olympus 8mm on my Panasonic L10 for years without image stabilization as well as using it on my GH1 along with the Olympus 7-14mm, my pictures aren’t any sharper than when I use it on my Olympus e620 camera that has built in on body image stabilization.

  6. Yeah, that the GH1 doesn’t have in-body stabilization, is sooo annoying! btw, does the olympus m43’s in-body stabilization work no matter what lens is on it?

  7. Looks like this will be a great lens but such a shame that the long awaited 100–300mm zoom isn’t be launched at the same time. Panasonic seem to be losing the marketing momentum that is required to get a new system up and running.

  8. Jules: You aren’t going to have as much benefit agreed, I still feel there is some benefit. However, it isn’t just this lens. It is just a peculiar product feature since the lenses, particularly if you carry multiple, are where bulkiness comes in. Anything to make them smaller (and cheaper) seems like a win.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search

Search
Advertisement
SNAPCLOUDBack up everyphotoTry freeSample ad

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

*Please also check your spam folder if you don't get the confirmation mail. And mark the mail as "non-spam" to see the future newsletter.

Advertisement
SNAPCLOUDBack up everyphotoTry freeSample ad
Advertisement
GRIPLINEPro camerastraps &bagsDiscoverSample ad
Advertisement
PHOTOGEARUp to30% offcamerasSee dealsSample ad